Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too. (Samuel Sieb)
Sergio, Thanks for responding to my plea... It's definitely appreciated. Part of the install of VirtualBox is the compilation of LKMs which use the kernel headers. Since 5-19 lacks support in VB (as far as I know at this point), if I run vboxconfig to recompile the LKMs, that compilation would fail and VB would stop working (I think). Parts of me thinks that if the compile fails, the targets of the compile process would remain unchanged but I'm not willing to take the chance. Sigh... Am I missing something here? Best regards, George... On Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 02:50:17 PM PDT, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sun, 2022-07-10 at 15:34 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Sam, > > Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. > > As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT > for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh. > yes , you should keep kernel-headers , you may do dnf distro-sync kernel-headers > What are your thoughts? > > Best regards, > > George... > > Sam wrote, "Try uninstalling each one separately to see which one is > causing the > problem." > > -- > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too.
On 2022-07-10 08:34, George R Goffe via test wrote: Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh. What are your thoughts? Delete them all except the headers package. You can leave that in, it's fine. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too. (Samuel Sieb)
On Sun, 2022-07-10 at 15:34 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Sam, > > Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. > > As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT > for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh. > yes , you should keep kernel-headers , you may do dnf distro-sync kernel-headers > What are your thoughts? > > Best regards, > > George... > > Sam wrote, "Try uninstalling each one separately to see which one is > causing the > problem." > > -- > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20220710.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/236 (x86_64), 17/165 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0): ID: 1320430 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320430 ID: 1320455 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320455 ID: 1320498 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320498 ID: 1320513 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320513 ID: 1320519 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320519 ID: 1320547 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320547 ID: 1320550 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320550 ID: 1320551 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320551 ID: 1320634 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320634 ID: 1320638 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320638 ID: 1320688 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320688 ID: 1320729 Test: aarch64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320729 ID: 1320755 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320755 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0): ID: 1320437 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320437 ID: 1320460 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320460 ID: 1320466 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320466 ID: 1320479 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320479 ID: 1320485 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320485 ID: 1320487 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320487 ID: 1320524 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320524 ID: 1320585 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320585 ID: 1320597 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320597 ID: 1320606 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320606 ID: 1320611 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320611 ID: 1320624 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320624 ID: 1320625 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320625 ID: 1320636 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade help_viewer@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320636 ID: 1320637 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320637 ID: 1320671 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320671 ID: 1320716 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320716 ID: 1320735 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320735 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/236 (x86_64), 5/165 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0): ID: 1320448 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320448 ID: 1320486 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso clocks URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320486 ID: 1320489 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320489 ID: 1320500 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320500 ID: 1320579 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320579 ID: 1320595 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too. (Samuel Sieb)
Sam, Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh. What are your thoughts? Best regards, George... Sam wrote, "Try uninstalling each one separately to see which one is causing the problem." -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too.
Dan, Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. I had "frozen" this system at the "release" of the 5.18 kernel... but goofed and let the 5.19 kernel get installed. So, by letting the 5.19 kernel get installed, EVERYTHING that uses the kernel headers was upgraded. Yes? In the past I have tried to downgrade from an installed package but got messages about the previous version(s) were not available in the repositories. I suspect that this is also the case with this current situation. Yes? There's no way to go except forward. Am I right? On the 5.19 problems and booting: The boot gets as far as the dracut-pre-mount hook which appears to succeed but then something starts looking at devices(?) vi UUID. In my previous experiences with the 5.19 kernel, this NEVER succeeds. Some kind of bug? Worth reporting? My current grub command line is 3 screen lines long. I had "quiet" added to this line but tried to edit this out temporarily from the command line by typing "e" at the grub menu. I get the requested grub entry but when I try to move the cursor (either forward or backward from the command line, the cursor moves a bit but then the system just freezes. Another bug? Worth reporting? As if this situation isn't bad enough, there are over 4000 upgrades that are broken and/or have dependencies unavailable. This situation began with the perl fiasco. I haven't had the time to figure out just what the problem is now. Otherwise, the system is at the current bleeding edge as far as upgrades are concerned. It really looks like I've stepped in it this time. Any suggestions, help, hints, tips would be greatly appreciated. At least the 5.18 kernel runs... Sigh. Best regards, George... On Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 02:59:54 AM PDT, Dan Horák wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 00:28:07 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble with dnf and the 5.19 kernel. > > I have tried to exclude the 5.19 kernel on this system (FC37) because 1) > Virtual box doesn't seem to support it yet, 2) the system gets stuck during > boot and the boot will NOT succeed (It seems to be running a list of UUIDs). > > The problem: somehow I managed to upgrade to the 5.19 kernel and am now > stuck. dnf seems to want to remove EVERYTHING that it thinks is dependent on > this kernel.I have used this command "dnf --noautoremove erase > kernel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-core-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-devel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-headers-5.19.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-modules-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-modules-extra-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64' > > > which is where the 501 dependencies comes from. > > I am a loss as to just what to do to get 5.19 out of my system. Is this > happenstance a bug? Do all these packages REALLY depend on the kernel version? > > "Normally" I would do something like "rpm --nodeps -e kernel*5.19*". Could > the solution be that simple? > > Any thoughts/hints/tips/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. do you have a different kernel (eg. 5.18) installed? kernel-headers is Required by glibc-devel, thus if you have any "devel" package installed, then they will be removed when kernel-headers will be removed. There is only one instance of kernel-headers installed at any time. Dan ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220710.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220710.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 5.21 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of upgraded packages: 632.33 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B
= ADDED IMAGES =
= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Comp_Neuro live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Comp_Neuro-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20220709.n.0.iso
= ADDED PACKAGES =
= DROPPED PACKAGES =
= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package: ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.58-1.fc37
Old package: ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.52-1.fc37
Summary: An X application for displaying and manipulating images
RPMs: ImageMagick ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-c++-devel
ImageMagick-devel ImageMagick-djvu ImageMagick-doc ImageMagick-libs
ImageMagick-perl
Size: 33.06 MiB
Size change: -5.03 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 S??rgio Basto - 1:6.9.12.56-1
- Update ImageMagick to 6.9.12.56 (#2105662)
* Sat Jul 09 2022 S??rgio Basto - 1:6.9.12.58-1
- Update ImageMagick to 6.9.12.58 (#2105662)
Package: arc-kde-20220706-1.fc37
Old package: arc-kde-20220612-1.fc37
Summary: Port of the popular GTK theme Arc for the Plasma 5 desktop
RPMs: arc-kde arc-kde-decorations arc-kde-konsole arc-kde-konversation
arc-kde-kvantum arc-kde-wallpapers arc-kde-yakuake
Size: 31.65 MiB
Size change: 1.95 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin 20220706-1
- Update to 20220706 - Close: rhbz#2104742
Package: barman-3.0.1-1.fc37
Old package: barman-2.17-3.fc37
Summary: Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL
RPMs: barman barman-cli python3-barman
Size: 597.07 KiB
Size change: 52.77 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Simone Caronni - 3.0.0-1
- Update to 3.0.0.
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Simone Caronni - 3.0.1-1
- Update to 3.0.1.
Package: blender-1:3.2.1-1.fc37
Old package: blender-1:3.2.0-7.fc37
Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 158.90 MiB
Size change: 11.16 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:3.2.1-1
- local build
Package: fonttools-4.34.4-1.fc37
Old package: fonttools-4.33.3-2.fc37
Summary: Tools to manipulate font files
RPMs: fonttools python3-fonttools python3-fonttools+graphite
python3-fonttools+interpolatable python3-fonttools+lxml python3-fonttools+plot
python3-fonttools+symfont python3-fonttools+type1 python3-fonttools+ufo
python3-fonttools+unicode python3-fonttools+woff
Size: 2.10 MiB
Size change: 23.84 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Parag Nemade - 4.34.4-1
- Update to 4.34.4 version (#2104988)
Package:
golang-github-facebookincubator-contest-0-0.4.20210706gitceebc35.fc37
Old package:
golang-github-facebookincubator-contest-0-0.3.20210706gitceebc35.fc36
Summary: Run continuous and on-demand system testing for real and virtual
hardware
RPMs: contest golang-github-facebookincubator-contest-devel
Size: 28.62 MiB
Size change: 226.40 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Maxwell G - 0-0.4
- Rebuild for CVE-2022-{24675,28327,29526 in golang}
Package:
golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb-0-0.4.20210706git2e66b27.fc37
Old package:
golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb-0-0.3.20210706git2e66b27.fc36
Summary: Facebook's implementation of a load balancer for DHCP
RPMs: dhcplb golang-github-facebookincubator-dhcplb-devel
Size: 8.35 MiB
Size change: 33.70 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Maxwell G - 0-0.4
- Rebuild for CVE-2022-{24675,28327,29526 in golang}
Package: golang-github-facebookincubator-go2chef-1.0-2.fc37
Old package: golang-github-facebookincubator-go2chef-1.0-1.fc37
Summary: Tool to bootstrap a system from zero so that it's able to run Chef
RPMs: go2chef golang-github-facebookincubator-go2chef-devel
Size: 16.21 MiB
Size change: 12.37 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Maxwell G 1.0-2
- Rebuild for CVE-2022-{24675,28327,29526 in golang}
Package: golang-github-facebookincubator-nvdtools-0.1.4-5.fc37
Old package: golang-github-facebookincubator-nvdtools-0.1.4-4.fc36
Summary: A collection of tools for working with National Vulnerability
Database feeds
RPMs: golang-github-facebookincubator-nvdtools-devel nvdtools
Size: 45.08 MiB
Size change: 276.60 KiB
Changelog:
* Sat Jul 09 2022 Maxwell G - 0.1.4-5
- Rebuild for CVE-2022-{24675,28327,29526 in golang}
Package: golang-github-gojuno-minimock-3.0.10-3.fc37
Old package: golang-github-gojuno-minimock-3.0.10-2.fc36
Summary: Powerful mock generation tool for Go programming language
RPMs: golang-github-gojuno-minimock-devel
Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 00:28:07 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble with dnf and the 5.19 kernel. > > I have tried to exclude the 5.19 kernel on this system (FC37) because 1) > Virtual box doesn't seem to support it yet, 2) the system gets stuck during > boot and the boot will NOT succeed (It seems to be running a list of UUIDs). > > The problem: somehow I managed to upgrade to the 5.19 kernel and am now > stuck. dnf seems to want to remove EVERYTHING that it thinks is dependent on > this kernel.I have used this command "dnf --noautoremove erase > kernel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-core-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-devel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-headers-5.19.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-modules-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 > kernel-modules-extra-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64' > > > which is where the 501 dependencies comes from. > > I am a loss as to just what to do to get 5.19 out of my system. Is this > happenstance a bug? Do all these packages REALLY depend on the kernel version? > > "Normally" I would do something like "rpm --nodeps -e kernel*5.19*". Could > the solution be that simple? > > Any thoughts/hints/tips/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. do you have a different kernel (eg. 5.18) installed? kernel-headers is Required by glibc-devel, thus if you have any "devel" package installed, then they will be removed when kernel-headers will be removed. There is only one instance of kernel-headers installed at any time. Dan ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-35-20220710.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220709.0): ID: 1320355 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320355 ID: 1320363 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320363 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-36-20220710.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220709.0): ID: 1320339 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320339 ID: 1320347 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1320347 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too.
On 2022-07-09 17:28, George R Goffe via test wrote: I'm having trouble with dnf and the 5.19 kernel. I have tried to exclude the 5.19 kernel on this system (FC37) because 1) Virtual box doesn't seem to support it yet, 2) the system gets stuck during boot and the boot will NOT succeed (It seems to be running a list of UUIDs). The problem: somehow I managed to upgrade to the 5.19 kernel and am now stuck. dnf seems to want to remove EVERYTHING that it thinks is dependent on this kernel.I have used this command "dnf --noautoremove erase kernel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 kernel-core-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 kernel-devel-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 kernel-headers-5.19.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc37.x86_64 kernel-modules-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64 kernel-modules-extra-5.19.0-0.rc5.20220707git9f09069cde34.43.fc37.x86_64' which is where the 501 dependencies comes from. Try uninstalling each one separately to see which one is causing the problem. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
