Re: GNOME 43.alpha builds in rawhide
Hey! tried to test this now in a Virtualbox VM on an Arch Linux host with latest Rawhide 20220803.5 and did not get GNOME 43 Alpha to work at all same with just on the host directly (maybe it does not work with my old NVIDIA GTX 760 card as GNOME 43 wants Wayland instead of Xorg and my GPU is to old for that?) it did however work on an older HP 655 laptop with an AMD GPU that works with Wayland On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:22 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 12:09:08 AM +0200, Kalev Lember > wrote: > > Various bits have switched over to libsoup 3 which also can cause > > breakage in consumers: it's not supported to link to both libsoup 2 > > and libsoup 3 in the same process, so care needs to be taken to only > > link to one of them. > > Some packages are expected to be broken for now, notably GNOME Maps and > GNOME Photos. If you know of other core applications that are broken, > please let us know. > > Michael > > ___ > desktop mailing list -- desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Call for testing: UEFI boot of current Rawhide images written to USB with dd
Spits outs dracut related errors on my older HP 655 laptop On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 3:04 PM Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hey! > > Seems the mediatest is broken for me (with this afternoon for me) image of > 20220803.5 > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20220803.n.0.iso > when i wrote the image with gnome-disks however and not dd also the regular > boot option spots out some problems but boots after a while > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:44 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> Hey folks! >> >> As part of testing the switch to using grub2 for BIOS boot of live and >> installer images, I tried writing a recent image to USB with dd and >> booting it in native UEFI mode on my test box. It didn't work. >> >> However, Brian Lane says it's fine for him, and I haven't seen anyone >> else mention this issue. So maybe it's something odd with my test stick >> or system. >> >> Can anyone else try writing a recent Rawhide image - I used Fedora- >> Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20220704.n.0.iso at the time, so a >> current equivalent would be >> >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20220802.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20220802.n.0.iso >> - to USB with dd then booting it in native UEFI mode on some system, >> and see if it works? It'd be good to know if there's a general issue or >> I just have some cranky hardware. Thanks! >> -- >> Adam Williamson >> Fedora QA >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha >> https://www.happyassassin.net >> >> ___ >> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220803.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220803.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: anaconda - 20220728.n.0: anaconda-37.11-2.fc37.src, 20220803.n.0: anaconda-37.12-1.fc37.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/37 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_37_Rawhide_20220803.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rpm -ivh kernel installation put no vmlinuz* in /boot/
Felix Miata composed on 2022-08-02 18:35 (UTC-0400): > Adam Williamson composed on 2022-08-02 14:10 (UTC-0700): >> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 15:20 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >>> Adam Williamson composed on 2022-08-02 11:23 (UTC-0700): On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 11:02 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Is this normal procedure now in rawhide? > I copied vmlinuz directly from the rpm to /boot/ and renamed it > vmlinuz-5.19.0-0.rc8.20220729git6e2c0490769e.62.fc37.x86_64, > though I could have symlinked its location in the /lib/modules tree. It > works. kernel is a metapackage that doesn't contain any files, the actual main parts of the kernel are in kernel-core. Is that what you meant? >>> I haven't installed "kernel" in over a year. I haven't been able to >>> determine any purpose it serves that is actually needed. What I ran was: >>> time rpm -ivh >>> kernel-core-5.19.0-0.rc8.20220729git6e2c0490769e.62.fc37.x86_64 >>> kernel-modules-5.19.0-0.rc8.20220729git6e2c0490769e.62.fc37.x86_64 >> OK. Well, it should have wound up putting the file in place, I think. I >> think it's not directly installed, but put in place by the %posttrans >> script, which does this (from the current package): >> rm -f /var/lib/rpm-state/kernel/installing_core_5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64 >> /bin/kernel-install add 5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64 >> /lib/modules/5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64/vmlinuz || exit $? >> did you get any scriptlet failures or anything? > I don't remember seeing anything to indicate failure at the time. String > vmlinuz > does not appear in /var/log/messages from yesterday, or in last 6 iterations > of > journal. :p Looks like my internal RAM failed. Different MBR host (fi965), newer kernel, same errant behavior, but error messages did result: # time rpm -ivh kernel-core-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64.rpm kernel-modules-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64.rpm Verifying... # [100%] Preparing... # [100%] Updating / installing... 1:kernel-core-5.19.0-65.fc37 # [ 50%] 2:kernel-modules-5.19.0-65.fc37# [100%] cp: cannot stat '/lib/modules/5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64/bls.conf': No such file or directory sed: can't read /boot/loader/entries/11352b14084942c18a21a5586db0b5b3-0-rescue.conf: No such file or directory warning: %posttrans(kernel-core-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 real2m45.397s user2m25.506s sys 0m26.617s # ls -Gg /boot/*5.19* -rw--- 1 15292124 Aug 3 03:57 /boot/initramfs-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64.img # ls -Gg /boot/*5.1* -rw--- 1 6256078 Jul 22 10:21 /boot/System.map-5.18.13-200.fc36.x86_64 -rw-r--r-- 1 247453 Jul 22 10:21 /boot/config-5.18.13-200.fc36.x86_64 -rw--- 1 17206976 Aug 3 02:51 /boot/initramfs-5.18.13-200.fc36.x86_64.img -rw--- 1 15292124 Aug 3 03:57 /boot/initramfs-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64.img -rwxr-xr-x 1 12187888 Jul 22 10:21 /boot/vmlinuz-5.18.13-200.fc36.x86_64 -rwxr-xr-x 1 12261008 Aug 1 09:52 /boot/vmlinuz-5.19.0-65.fc37.x86_64 # efibootmgr -bash: efibootmgr: command not found # So $SUMMARY isn't quite on target. Kernel installation with rpm only puts an initrd in /boot/. As before, with my manual adjusting done, 5.19 is working as expected. -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Call for testing: UEFI boot of current Rawhide images written to USB with dd
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:45 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Can anyone else try writing a recent Rawhide image - I used Fedora- > Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20220704.n.0.iso at the time, so a > current equivalent would be > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20220802.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20220802.n.0.iso > - to USB with dd then booting it in native UEFI mode on some system, > and see if it works? It'd be good to know if there's a general issue or > I just have some cranky hardware. Thanks! > Wrote the linked ISO to a thumb drive using Fedora Media Writer. Tested UEFI-only boot on three different computers, works fine. Tested BIOS-only boot on two different computers, and IT'S BROKEN. Well, it actually works fine on my Intel 4th gen-based desktop PC, but it doesn't boot on my Thinkpad T480s (in "Legacy only, CSM enabled" mode). When I select the flash drive in the one-time boot menu, it just immediately returns back to the menu. On the same T480s, Fedora 36 images boot just fine in BIOS-only mode. Not good. Worth reporting it somewhere? (I'm not sure if I can add any more valuable data, though). ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
