Re: rc.local fails

2023-04-13 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 4/13/23 16:53, George R Goffe via test wrote:

To get rc.local running you used to be able to put the file in /etc/rc.d and 
then reboot.

This has worked for quite some time but does not any more. This situation has 
been happening now for several months. Am I missing something?


Is the file executable?
man systemd-rc-local-generator

But why are you using it anyway?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


rc.local fails

2023-04-13 Thread George R Goffe via test
Howdy,

To get rc.local running you used to be able to put the file in /etc/rc.d and 
then reboot. 

This has worked for quite some time but does not any more. This situation has 
been happening now for several months. Am I missing something?

Any/all help/hints/tips/suggestions would be appreciated.

Best regards,

George...
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Error in Fedora 38 with texlive amb memoir class

2023-04-13 Thread Rafel Amer
Hi!
I have applied the patch

--- latex.ltx   2023-04-13 18:00:51.004455802 +0200
+++ /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx  2023-04-13 
18:07:50.797322996 +0200
@@ -15798,6 +15798,8 @@
 \@maxdepth = \maxdepth
 \newdimen\paperheight
 \newdimen\paperwidth
+\newdimen\stockheight
+\newdimen\stockwidth
 \newif \if@insert
 \newif \if@fcolmade
 \newif \if@specialpage \@specialpagefalse
and generated again the formats pdflatex and lualatex and now it works fine.

The patch is to add two lines to the file 
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx

Best regards,
Rafel Amer
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 38 Final Go/No-Go meeting next week

2023-04-13 Thread Luna Jernberg
*attending*

On 4/6/23, Ben Cotton  wrote:
> The Fedora Linux 38 Final Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for
> Thursday 13 April at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we
> will determine the status of the F38 Final for the 18 April early
> target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see
> the wiki[3].
>
> [1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/meeting/10487/
> [2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html
> [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
> ___
> test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now!

2023-04-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 09:41 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> 
> FWIW from the alt-arch point of view the RC 1.5 is better (aka more
> complete) than RC 1.4, which is mainly lacking the s390x cloud images.

Well, I'm not really sure. We track missing images. This is RC-1.4:

https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4851

This is RC-1.5:

https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4855

1.5 is definitely missing a *lot* more stuff.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Error in Fedora 38 with texlive amb memoir class

2023-04-13 Thread Rafel Amer
I think the problem is in the file (I don't know where)
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
because if I replace this file with the same file distributed with TeXLive 2023 
and regenerate the formats pdflatex and lualatex, then the commands
~$ pdflatex test.tex
and 
~$ lualatex test.tex
work. The give some warnings, but the output PDF files are OK
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Error in Fedora 38 with texlive amb memoir class

2023-04-13 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:25 AM Rafel Amer  wrote:

> I have a simple TeX document test.tex
>
> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{memoir}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> This is a test
>
> \end{document}
>
>
> But, if I run the same command if Fedora 38-beta, I get the following error
>
>
I am experiencing the same issue on my Fedora 38, but I was not able to
find out why. I tried to downgrade the memoir package and
the result was the same.



-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat



Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Error in Fedora 38 with texlive amb memoir class

2023-04-13 Thread Rafel Amer
I have a simple TeX document test.tex

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{memoir}

\begin{document}

This is a test

\end{document}

If I run pdflatex test.tex in Fedora 37, it works fine:

This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.22 (TeX Live 2021) (preloaded 
format=pdflatex)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./test.tex
LaTeX2e <2020-10-01> patch level 4
L3 programming layer <2021-05-07>
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/memoir/memoir.cls
Document Class: memoir 2021/03/23 v3.7o configurable book, report, article docu
ment class
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/iftex/iftex.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/memoir/mem12.clo)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/array.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/dcolumn.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/delarray.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/tabularx.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/textcase/textcase.sty))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3backend/l3backend-pdftex.def)
(./test.aux) [1{/usr/share/texlive/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map
}] (./test.aux) )
Output written on test.pdf (1 page, 9544 bytes).
Transcript written on test.log.

But, if I run the same command if Fedora 38-beta, I get the following error

This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded 
format=pdflatex)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./test.tex
LaTeX2e <2022-06-01> patch level 5
L3 programming layer <2022-12-17>
! Use of @tempa doesn’t match its definition.
u
ndefined
l.2

?

Any help is appreciated. Thank you very much
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now!

2023-04-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:53:41 -0700
Adam Williamson  wrote:

> On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 11:48 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hey All,
> > 
> > We are closing in on the Go/NoGo tonight and We would like to have as much
> > feedback as possible on this new 1.5 RC.
> > Also, there is a potential nvme bug
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358, people with nvme
> > storage devices with
> > free cycles, we do appreciate you testing this out!
> > 
> > Also, Fedora Media Writer hasn't been tested on Mac and Windows 11, so if
> > you have any of those, it would be great to have some
> > testing on those as well!
> 
> So, for a bit more back story: the only difference between 1.4 and 1.5
> is (should be, anyway) that the lives and Server DVD of 1.5 include
> nvme-cli. Otherwise there shouldn't be any difference.
> 
> We did 1.5 to give us another option to deal with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358 at the go/no-go in
> the morning. Unfortunately it seems a lot of images failed in the 1.5
> build because of some kind of network issue - we're missing several
> lives, and the x86_64 Silverblue installer image. We probably can't
> really ship 1.5.
> 
> So, our options will be to ship 1.4 (i.e. reject or waive the nvme bug
> as a blocker), ship some kind of hybrid of 1.4 and 1.5 (i.e. most of
> 1.4, but the Server DVD from 1.5, probably), or slip. We'll figure this
> out at the meeting tomorrow.

FWIW from the alt-arch point of view the RC 1.5 is better (aka more
complete) than RC 1.4, which is mainly lacking the s390x cloud images.


Dan

> 
> All testing of 1.4 and 1.5 is useful; for 1.5 probably focus on smoke
> tests of the Server images, and also confirming that it actually fixes
> 2186358 . For 1.4, if folks can fill out any remaining gaps in the
> matrices that'd be great.
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> -- 
> Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
> Fedora QA
> Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
> https://www.happyassassin.net
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue