Re: nfs mounts in fstab are not mounted at boot
On 05/12/2011 11:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 20:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> In Fedora 14 I had my NFS mounts nicely mounted at boot time. In Fedora >> 15 I have to manually mount them. >> >> I think I saw some discussion about this issue in the past but I cannot >> find it. Is this a known issue? >> >> /etc/fstab: >> intranet:/home/xandell/Music /media/music nfs4 >> defaults,nodev,noexec,nosuid0 0 > I would expect systemd to try and mount it, but I guess the nfs4 > defaults may be different from nfs. try adding 'auto' as an option. > > for extra bonus points, try adding comment=systemd.automount as an > option, then boot up and do 'ls /media/music' . it should get mounted > _at the point you do the ls_. What happens if you add the _netdev option to the nfs mounts in /etc/fstab? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f14 and xfce 4.8
On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: Following Alan's suggestion to consider xfce as an alternative to gnome shell - I see the f14 version is 4.6.2 and the current (as of january 2011) is 4.8 Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ? thanks! http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/ Rahul This is good info. Can someone explain how to switch to/from XFCE? I remember this used to be done via GDM, but I can't find a tool to configure it, and don't remember the config files for it. -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: CR-48
On 01/02/2011 03:21 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:58, Timothy Davis wrote: I don't mean to brag (but I will) but has anyone gotten Fedora on a Google Chrome Notebook. I know Ubuntu has been installed on it and there are plenty of howtos on the "that" particular subject but can those instructions be modified to fit Fedora? or rather can someone modify them. I haven't had the time to work on it and would appreciate anyone who does have the time. It is pretty much standard hardware so all you'd have to do is to get it start anaconda (i.e boot the install media) I applied to get one, but I'm not one of the anointed. I think you get one if you are a popular blogger or tech-related website operator. IE: the press. I read an article that it is not really standard hardware, although there is a "developer mode" switch on it to allow running code not signed by Google that should make it easier to hack. I thought however that it still wants to wipe the disk if you mess with that switch. Something like putting it back in "normal" mode will re-install ChromeOS. At least I hope it would since it would be real hard to get back to using stock ChromeOS without a CD. -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: big f14 iso ?
Did anyone actually try that link? Transmission says the torrent contains a "download.txt" file and the entire iso directory from a mirror. That's the CHECKSUM file, the DVD image, 5 CD images, and the netinst.iso. It's a waste of time to download it. On 12/30/2010 04:54 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 23:43 +0200, cornel panceac wrote: 2010/12/30 Robert G. (Doc) Savage On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 22:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote: > anybody knows what is this 6.9 GB f14 (?) iso? > > > http://torrent.cs.pub.ro/download/fedora14-iso-i386.torrent Cornel, Can you provide any additional context info about it? I'd rather not have to download that much only to find it's a modified copy of, say, the Fedora-14-Live-multi.iso. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL i find it here: http://www.fedoraproject.ro/download i have no idea what it is or if it's an official fedora spin. as i see here, http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mega-dvd-test/Fedora-14-Live-multi/ this iso is 5.2 GB, so i'd say it's not it. Cornel, Since the official F14 i386 iso is only 3.4GB, I'll guess that the 6.9GB iso on the Romanian site may be a local build of some sort. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 64bit Flash player
On 07/07/2010 07:01 PM, birger wrote: There is no 64 bit build for windows? Wow. I didn't expect that. Perhaps i am getting too distant from that other os. Microsoft ships the 32-bit IE as the default browser even on 64 bit builds just so the plugins work (AFAICT). No matter why they removed the 64 bit build (being as closed as it is we can only guess anyway) it ought to generate more interest in getting gnash fixed up. It seems to have improved a lot. Can it get as compatible as evince has gotten for pdf? Probably not (or at least not soon) thanks to DRM. -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 64bit Flash player
On 07/07/2010 04:28 AM, Rob Healey wrote: Dear poc, Ankue, and Chris: Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being able to use and benefit from the web content that should be available to all! If anyone who reads this that knows someone at Adobe, I would like to get a repsonse from Adobe!!! I want to know why thay should to screw us out of the internet Sincerely yours, Rob G. Healey Perhaps even Adobe secretly wants HTML5 to replace Flash? -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: flash player 64bit?
On 07/06/2010 11:16 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: hey, There's an alpha release of 64bit flash that works well enough(like poc said, this one has as many problems as usual flash) you can look at the fedoraproject.org wiki page on flash. It has the required info. regards, Ankur Not anymore. Adobe yanked it. -- Chris Kloiber smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
