Re: Error creating Xfce's Live image - Remmina
Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2014, 23:19 +0200 schrieb Simone Caronni: Hello, I would like to upgrade the current Fedora rawhide packages for FreeRDP and Remmina to the latest git snapshot. I regularly use Remmina and one of my packages require a fairly up to date FreeRDP. Currently, if I've investigated correctly, the only consumers of FreeRDP are the RDP plugin of Remmina, the RDP plugin of Guacamole and RPMFusion's VLC (?). I'm already comaintainer for FreeRDP and maintainer for Guacamole. From what I've read there's not much interest in FreeRDP/Remmina, so I would like to maintain/co-maintain the whole stack along with Guacamole. Would it be acceptable for the people here an update in Rawhide to the current git snapshots? I can ask for Remmina permissions in pkgdb if it's ok for everybody. Please do, I recently orphaned the package. Best regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Error creating Xfce's Live image - Remmina
Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2014, 18:17 +0200 schrieb poma: ... Remmina https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina Update to the latest git commit 26b814a, build with the latest libvncserver git commit 646f844 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092243 ... Guys, would you pick up Remmina. If you would like to help, you are more than welcome. If you are a Fedora packager, you can apply for commit access at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/remmina Please make sure your git config has your correct full name and email address. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 15:07 -0700 schrieb Tim Flink: The testing that we're most interested in is the various desktop environments with an emphasis on the display managers (gdm, kdm, lightdm etc.) because any show-stopping problems are most likely to exist there. The second most likely place is inside any of the livecd desktop environments (kde, gnome, xfce etc.). I have tested Xfce and lightdm and things are fine with both RC4 and RC3. However I'd like to ask you if we can go for RC4, because ... To that end, if you have the time to download RC4 [2] and run through some or all of the desktop test cases [3], please do. The more testing we get on RC4, the easier tomorrow's decision to choose RC3 or RC4 will be. RC3 Xfce x84_64 was slightly oversized with 701 MB. RC2 and RC4 on the other hand only were 691 MB. I've also tested the fprintd update to fix #810040, which AFAIK is the only difference between RC3 and RC4, so I'd opt for RC4. Kind regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R: RC4 is missing Wine and TigerVNC. The Xfce spin never shipped wine or TigerVNC, actually I am not aware of any spin or media that ships them and if, it would have been more than 10 MB difference in size. Kind regrds, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Xfce tracker bug
Hi there, if you find any bugs in Xfce or the Xfce spin, please let them block the 'F18Xfce' tracker bug [1] so we can look into them ASAP. Kind regards, Christoph [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863722 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Xfce tracker bug
Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2012, 02:10 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert: Hi there, if you find any bugs in Xfce or the Xfce spin, please let them block the 'F18Xfce' tracker bug [1] so we can look into them ASAP. Sorry, I forgot to mention that this bug is *only* for Xfce on F18 or F19, maybe even to Xfce 4.10 on F17 (from Kevin's repo), but not for Xfce 4.8 or anything on F16. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: block on name
Am Freitag, den 27.04.2012, 14:55 -0400 schrieb george2: I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name is changed in the released code. I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this name may do considerable harm. There is not formal criterion for a blocker bug. So I appeal to this group, as the last in the community, to present their decision that the release is not yet ready, for humanitarian reasons. Humanitarianism is an universal concept that tries to establish a set of common values not based on grounds of religion, gender or nationality, but if I understand you correctly your concerns are religious. Correct? You would block if there was a flaw in an important technical element, but Fedora is more than technology, it is a community. So far we had two people raising their concerns, but our community is much bigger. We certainly don't want to offend anyone, but when dealing with a world-wide community with many different cultures, it is nearly impossible to it right for everybody. Most who communicated with me believe this is not the place to raise this request. That iis too late in the process. The name process was discussed by the board and they declined to address the concerns raised and defer to address naming and word meaning and connotations at a future release. If this had been flushed-out when the warning was raised, it would not have impacted the placement of the objected-to name in so many places and documentation and release notes. I was not part of those initial dialogs. Then please be so kind as to read what has been discussed before. It was already to late when this topic was brought up on the advisory board weeks ago and bringing it up now is certainly too late. The person who brought the issue to the Board's attention was fine with our approach to address this with a connotation analysis in the future. This requires that people speak up when the naming suggestions are announced. Some have said to me that it cannot be stopped because legal or some other group did not object so it is ok for Testing to assume ok. It's not so much the Red Hat Legal department. They just sort out names that don't work for legal reasons but they don't force us to pick anything. The reason we cannot stop it was because 1) it has already been subject to a vote of the community and b) several groups such as the design-team, marketing or the ambassadors already prepared for this name. But also note that few women are involved in the approval processes. The banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing something wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to act. I am sorry, I don't understand what this has to do with gender or financial crisis. When speaking of woman, please note the the FPL is one and did not have any objections. Consider please: if one headmaster says the release is inappropriate to use in the teaching or desktop situation; if one religious leader objects to its use in that the supporting material for the name says this is your new god AFAIK none of our marketing materials says this. if one advocate of equality for women speaks up Would you mind explaining what this has to do with equality of woman? if one government department says its use violates discrimination in the workplace laws Again I wonder what this has has to do with discrimination. Would you mind to elaborate this one, too? if one parent objects and it is picked up by the press I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors to Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build. I agree we should be more careful in the future, but this requires that our community speaks up as problems occur and not 6 months later. Kind regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 23:03 -0700 schrieb Adam Williamson: As mentioned before, we don't really need to re-do the whole set of tests, but it'd be good to get a few done just to make sure the RC3 image hasn't gone horribly wrong somehow. The only things that should have changed are KDE and Xfce bug fixes. LXDE changed as well, and this affects also the Security Lab, since it is based on LXDE. For LXDE, please test: * that power management (suspend and hibernate) works (#749985) * that you have notifications For Security Spin, please test * the 2 LXDE test cases above * that you have sound (#749985) For Xfce please test that metacity is not installed and firstboot is run under xfwm4 (#750397) Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
Am Dienstag, den 01.11.2011, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert: For Xfce please test that metacity is not installed and firstboot is run under xfwm4 (#750397) Test succeeded, but now we are running into #746693. Looks like we need to bring metacity back. Grumbl, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Power button in f16?
Am Montag, den 24.10.2011, 17:41 -0700 schrieb Adam Williamson: On my laptop, pressing the 'power' button in current f16 causes the system to shut down, not suspend - even though the dconf preference says suspend. Anyone else noticed this lately? Yes, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746982 Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Feedback for two updates required
Hi, we ened feedback for two Xfce updates: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674321 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694900 Once these updates are approved, we have made it for F15. All Xfce blockers [1] are fixed already and for the targets [2] we only have the two listed above and the ones that are outside our scope, e.g. where we depend on GNOME. Regards, Christoph [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678917 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678916 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fallback mode further hosed?
Am Freitag, den 22.04.2011, 13:05 -0500 schrieb Jason D. Clinton: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:52, Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote: One wonders...what is rawhide for if we're not supposed to run it? I'm not a Fedora packager but I do read these mailing lists consistently and it's pretty clear from discussion in the past few weeks that the situation is--essentially--the following: In an ideal world, rawhide would be updated at the same time that F15 is. However, because some packagers and, indeed, entire teams are focused exclusively on the F15 branch, large sections of rawhide are months behind the packaged versions in F15 branch. How would that happen if F15 builds are inherited in rawhide? $ koji list-tag-inheritance dist-rawhide dist-rawhide (17) └─dist-f16 (169) └─dist-f15-updates (153) └─dist-f15 (152) └─dist-f14-updates (119) └─dist-f14 (117) └─dist-f13-updates (115) └─dist-f13 (108) └─dist-f12-updates (105) └─dist-f12 (85) └─dist-f11-updates (87) └─dist-f11 (62) └─dist-f10-updates (64) └─dist-f10 (45) └─f9-cutoff (110) Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f14 and xfce 4.8
Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists: On 03/21/2011 01:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/21/2011 10:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: Is there a chance 4.8 could be packaged for f14 ? thanks! http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/ Rahul Great - thank you ... Please keep in mind that these are not official Fedora packages, i. e.they are not signed. If you spot any bugs, please report them on the Fedora Xfce mailing list [1] or to me directly rather than in bugzilla. Bugzilla should only be used for Xfce of F15 or rawhide. Regards, Christoph [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f14 and xfce 4.8
Am Montag, den 21.03.2011, 15:10 -0400 schrieb Genes MailLists: On 03/21/2011 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Please keep in mind that these are not official Fedora packages, i. e.they are not signed. [...] Yes thank you - i understood them as your private builds (not being in koji) ... I could actually use scratch-builds in koji but these are indeed built in mock on my laptop. are there any thoughts to push to updates testing at some point ? Nope. The update is not trivial and will confuse users of stable releases. It doesn't mix with our updates policy [1]. I think this is a good candidate for the updates-features repo I want to establish. Regards, Christoph [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Montag, den 24.01.2011, 09:13 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 17:17 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: Glad to hear that, but it's not really a solution. In the past we had to reduce the number of applications with every release because the dependency footprint became worse and worse. Now we cannot even ship gnumeric in the Xfce spin any longer. I am pretty sure our users don't want us to spend the new space with an additional desktop they cannot / don't want use. The only way to avoid this continuing slide is to find somebody who is willing to work on language packs. What language packs? AFAICS it's mostly input methods and I'm afraid we cannot exclude people here. Therefor cutting the dependency bload becomes more important. If you look at the depchain tracker you will see that some of the deps are not serving any purpose and are just wrong. I'd appreciate if people looked at the bugs we file. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Samstag, den 22.01.2011, 14:05 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:51:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote: oh, but should it start panels? or at least the gnomeshell? Yes, it starts gnome-shell, unless your system is not capable of running it, in which case it starts gnome-panel+metacity. I did a yum upgrade from F14 to rawhide a month or so ago and have been doing contunuous updates since then. Nothing seems to have dragged in gnome-shell. It's probably worth thinking about a way to it installed for people doing yum upgrades from F13 or F14. I am not sure if using preupgrade has the same issue or not. That is a good point. We should perhaps add a gnome-session - gnome-shell dependency. Please don't. GDM already requires gnome-session and with gnome-shell and it's deps the Xfce spin would be way over CD size. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 00:07 +0100 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: what about users choice? Isn't that what free software is about? You have the freedom to modify the packages to remove any dependencies you want to. You don't have the freedom to insist that packagers support that use case. So what are all the people that don't have video cards suppose to do that don't support 3D. Use KDE? I thought gnome was continuing to support that use case? And it still does ... in that case it will start metacity and gnome-panel even without user interaction. (which has nothing to do with package dependencies other than a few megabytes of disk space that aren't worth worrying about imo). It's not (only) about a few megabytes on installed system but about space on the install media and especially on the spins. With this change, we would get gnome-shell on almost any spin and they all would be larger than CD size then. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 20:40 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 01/23/2011 08:33 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Please don't. GDM already requires gnome-session and with gnome-shell and it's deps the Xfce spin would be way over CD size. Any particular reason, Xfce spin is not using a different DM? Because there is no good alternative: * SLIM has problems with ConsoleKit and is dead upstream * LXDM is does not offer a keyboard selection and is broken in many ways, too. * Light-DM is not yet packaged but also kind of broken Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 09:53 -0600 schrieb Bruno Wolff III: On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:03:13 +0100, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Please don't. GDM already requires gnome-session and with gnome-shell and it's deps the Xfce spin would be way over CD size. Note that live spins should be getting back some space (probably about 50 MB for CD size images) this release as the xz stuff is coming together. I have already had a successful test fo a spin using xz and have asked nirik to start using xz for the nightly composes. So hopefully they'll be a noticeable drop in spin sizes in the next couple of days. Glad to hear that, but it's not really a solution. In the past we had to reduce the number of applications with every release because the dependency footprint became worse and worse. Now we cannot even ship gnumeric in the Xfce spin any longer. I am pretty sure our users don't want us to spend the new space with an additional desktop they cannot / don't want use. BTW: FESCo started an effort to cut excessive dependencies. Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=661442 you will see that our GNOME maintainers are very unresponsive to the bugs we file. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 22:42 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 01/23/2011 09:58 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Also keep in mind that there are other first-class desktop environment. Moblin is just as much a GNOME based first-class desktop environment as gnome-shell, just for a different use-case (Netbooks). I don't think that's the case. GNOME Shell is a integral part of GNOME 3. Moblin upstream seems only interested in being a complete OS and haven't cooperated well with other projects which want to include Moblin as a alternative UI in their distributions. Conman, trademark shenanigans etc. I understand the point you are trying to make but Moblin is really a poor example to pick. I agree it's a poor example and Ubuntu's Unity is yet another one because they don't cooperate well ether. Nevertheless all these are user interfaces based on GNOME technology. They are not default and seriously shouldn't be but it is a fact that there is more than just one desktop, more than just gnome-shell. Thus we should not force our users to install things they cannot use or don't want to. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: What has happened to desktop icons in rawhide?
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 20:01 +0100 schrieb drago01: On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 22:42 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 01/23/2011 09:58 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Also keep in mind that there are other first-class desktop environment. Moblin is just as much a GNOME based first-class desktop environment as gnome-shell, just for a different use-case (Netbooks). I don't think that's the case. GNOME Shell is a integral part of GNOME 3. Moblin upstream seems only interested in being a complete OS and haven't cooperated well with other projects which want to include Moblin as a alternative UI in their distributions. Conman, trademark shenanigans etc. I understand the point you are trying to make but Moblin is really a poor example to pick. I agree it's a poor example and Ubuntu's Unity is yet another one because they don't cooperate well ether. Nevertheless all these are user interfaces based on GNOME technology. They are not default and seriously shouldn't be gnome-shell *is* the default gnome user interface starting with gnome3. I didn't claim something different. I said that *Unity and Moblin* are not default, but regardless of what is default, we shouldn't force users to install something they ether don't want to use or cannot even use. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Not Authorized (can't mount USB flash drive as normal user)
Hi Steven, first of all a big thanks for testing the LXDE spin so carefully. Am Freitag, den 13.08.2010, 12:38 -0700 schrieb Steven I Usdansky: LXDE spin alpha RC4 x86_64. When referring to LXDE, please mention LXDE in the subject so I don't miss your mail in all the traffic on this list. You could also write to the LXDE mailing list[1]. The list is very low traffic and I can take care of all requests there. Boot into runlevel 3 as normal user Run startx to start an LXDE session Plug in USB flash drive - file manager appears Click on flash drive's entry to mount Error dialog appears with msg: Not Authorized How to fix? You need to open a console-kit session for your user. You can do this by calling ck-launch-session. Please try changing /etc/sysconfig/desktop from PREFERRED=/usr/bin/startlxde to PREFERRED=ck-launch-session /usr/bin/startlxde and tell me if it works. Unfortunately there is no documentation on ConsoleKit available ATM, so I have to admit that this case was not tested and I'm afraid other desktops might have the same problem. Regards, Christoph [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/lxde -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC2 LXDE spin two polkit invocations
Am Dienstag, den 10.08.2010, 22:16 + schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: Any particular reason there does not exist polkit-lxde and polkit-xfce? The reason is that it's called lxpolkit. Regards, Christoph JBG -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC2 LXDE spin two polkit invocations
Am Dienstag, den 10.08.2010, 12:04 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: IMO, you can just use your provenpackager rights for making such changes yourself. It doesn't affect anything except LXDE and you are the LXDE maintainer in Fedora. In the past I've had some troubles with the maintainer of the package in question and don't want to have more, so I stick with the normal procedure for now. Rahul Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC2 LXDE spin two polkit invocations
Am Dienstag, den 10.08.2010, 16:40 + schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: On 08/10/2010 02:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Dienstag, den 10.08.2010, 12:04 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: IMO, you can just use your provenpackager rights for making such changes yourself. It doesn't affect anything except LXDE and you are the LXDE maintainer in Fedora. In the past I've had some troubles with the maintainer of the package in question and don't want to have more, so I stick with the normal procedure for now. FYI the package is assigned to Orphan Owner which indicates it's dead hence it should be removed from the distro. Huh? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/polkit-gnome Not that the owner of the package is not the person I was referring to. I was talking about the person that did the latest builds. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC2 LXDE spin two polkit invocations
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 11:26 -0700 schrieb Adam Williamson: On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 04:22 -0700, Steven I Usdansky wrote: Installed lxde-x86_64-20100806.15.iso, and everything seems to work. However, upon starting X (from runlevel 3) I get the following error: Remote Exception invoking org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Authority.RegisterAuthenticationAgent () on /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/Authority at name org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1: org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Error.Failed: An authentication agent already exists for session Cannot register authentication agent Looking in /etc/xdg/autostart, I see two invocations of polkit: lxpolkit.desktop polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1.desktop which come from lxpolkit-0.1.0-0.1.20100402git5087383.fc14.x86_64 polkit-gnome-0.96-2.fc14.x86_64 respectively. Eliminating the latter seems to be the fix polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1.desktop has NotShowIn=KDE; but lacks LXDE. I requested this on the desktop list more than half a year ago, but so far nothing has happened. Therefor I opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622580 now. Thanks for testing. Looks like something LXDE team would like to know about. I guess the LXDE spin kickstart should be adjusted to not include polkit-gnome, if that's practical? Thanks for the heads-up. I have fixed this in http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spin-kickstarts.git;a=commit;h=5170738dfcececf3843ab0fb139375c0ef56830b Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
