Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
Alright, I believe this was very useful as we fixed countless issues today. Thank you all who participated. Here is latest scratch build for the weekend testers: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86732788 And other builds can be found here: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases I will take a break now as today was quite exhausting :). ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
New scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403 Flatpak/Windows/MacOS builds here: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases This should fix small dialogs with bigger fonts, broken Fedora Server downloads, uses exFAT for Windows drive restoration and fixes MacOS build on M1 Macs. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
I have a fix already for the "Fedora Server" showing "version 0". No need to open a bug for that. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
> I tested the RPM and Flatpak version on Fedora 36 Workstation, using > Thinkpad P1 gen3 with an Intel graphics, and so far I found these issues: > > "Intel 64bit" as a hardware architecture is confusing > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/451 Fixed. > Beta versions shouldn't be offered by default > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/452 Fixed. > "Delete after writing" is always on after first use > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/453 Fixed. > "Delete download after writing" doesn't make sense when selecting a custom > ISO > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/455 Fixed. > A failure in writing is reported as success (!!) > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/456 > > Flatpak version doesn't show notifications > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/457 Fixed. > FMW allows to write a corrupted image (somehow) > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/458 > > Unable to download an image from a custom URL > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/460 > > Renewing a download makes the Writing dialog stuck > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/461 Fixed. > Can't handle a corrupted downloaded, Retry does nothing useful > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/462 > > While that's a lot of issues, many of them are already present in current > stable FMW 4.2, or they're not critical for FMW 5.0 release once F36 is > out. So, so far, I haven't found a show-stopper for FMW 5.0. A new scratch build with above mentioned fixes is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86719554 And updated Flatpak build on the usual place: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
Update: Here is a new scratch build adding qt6-qtsvg as a dependency: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86712414 And updated Flatpak build with updated AppStream metadata to show correct version is on the same place: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
Hi, > Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after > testing X86_64 > RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin: > - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't > have any > graphics > - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partition is > destroyed, but new > one fails to be created (screenshot in a folder) Can you try to restore it with some partition manager and try again (to write and restore)? And if it fails again, can you try in the old FMW. after restoring in some other partition manager and making a new write? We didn't really touch the code responsible for restoration so I would expect it to behave the same as with old FMW. > - Upon re-plug restore option does not appear > - Note: Downloading beta, downloads 1.4 image, not 1.5 (as of 9:15 > 06.05.2022) > > Downloaded and locally stored images written correctly, so no issues there. > > Some screenshots here: > https://drive.protonmail.com/urls/HW3YC020A0#GSjTU0JxWz7k Thank you for testing. Regards, Jan ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral > I tested the RPM and the Flatpak on Fedora Workstation 36 on an Intel > GPU. I flashed Fedora Kinoite 36 Beta to a USB stick using it > successfully. > > With both the RPM and the Flatpak, I noticed that it doesn't follow > the light/dark preference from GNOME, but that's probably > QGnomePlatform there. > > With the RPM, the panels don't seem to have any imagery? The picture > of the main window in the readme has a graphic that doesn't show up on > my installed version. No graphic on the downloading and writing panels > either. At the end when it's finished, the main window still says writing to > disk, even though the notification was pushed that it finished, so it > didn't switch to the "finished" window pane. Closing it in this > scenario seems harmless, but confusing. Otherwise, it seems to work fine. > Missing runtime dependency on qt6-qtsvg. I will fix that. Not sure about the wrong state, I will try to reproduce. > When testing the Flatpak, it seems to work the same, except the > imagery shows up and the finished writing panel shows up. The Flatpak > downloads ISOs much more slowly than the RPM (like several orders > slower!). > This is weird, I'm now testing both and have same results. As the code for download hasn't change since the old FMW version I don't think this is a new issue in FMW 5.0.0. > Are the RPM and the Flatpak built from the same commit? If so, there > might be a packaging bug in the RPM one. > > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0
Hi, can you upload images somewhere else? They cannot be opened. > Tested on Fedora 36 Kinoite - Flatpak downloaded from > (https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/latest-flatpak/...). > System Info (https://paste.centos.org/view/2ecf0d35) > > * After installation of the flatpak, doing a `flatpak list` shows that the > app is version > 4.2.0. But I'm assuming that it's the 5.0 version since the UI is different > than > what I'm used to. > Good catch. We forgot to update AppStream metadata. > * The Write Options Screen has the UI overflow below the bottom of the window > and the > window cannot be scrolled or resized to view it. > (https://pasteboard.co/qBWgpml9QpJf.png) > > * The Downloads Screen has an icon mid/center, but it is very small and can't > see what > it is. (https://pasteboard.co/eAOAcGJsOmKm.png) > > * Canceling a download. Dialog box is cut off, and cannot scroll down/resize > window to > confirm cancel. (https://pasteboard.co/uGXAtOM7dhsZ.png) > > * Restore Screen. Same window size issue. > (https://pasteboard.co/xMGItvM5ci04.png) > > * Deleting media after write. I couldn't see whether the option for Delete > download > after writing was checked due to window layout > (https://pasteboard.co/cYDUEmEr89ED.png). > Nevertheless, on the Writing media screen, the text "This will delete > installation > media from your drive" appears (https://pasteboard.co/ZJnHjfBj1Yvj.png). If > the > Delete Download button was not active, this message shouldn't appear. If the > Delete > Download was active, and I couldn't see it, the actual behavior is wrong > because the > media was *not* deleted from my drive after the write completed. > This all will be most likely a common issue, but I'm unable to see the screenshots and reproduce. > > * Confirmed working: Write USB using Download Automatically method (Fedora > Silverblue > 36). > > * Confirmed working: Restored USB drive to full size in FAT32 format. > > * Confirmed working: Write USB using Select .iso file method > (Fedora-LXQt-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso). > > * Confirmed working: Booted from USB drive (LXQt Spin) attached to KVM > virtual machine in > BIOS mode and second install in UEFI mode. Installation completed > successfully and booted. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
