Re: ✏ Justice Ginsburg Petition Attached: Sign to Save Ruth

[Jonathan Calloway]

Oh come on!! Do we have to politicize everything?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 8, 2019, at 10:32 PM, George R Goffe via test 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: "SUPREME COURT in JEOPARDY >> | John Lewis HQ" 
> 
> To: George Goffe  
> Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 5:03 PM
> Subject: ✏ Justice Ginsburg Petition Attached: Sign to Save Ruth
> 
>  
> Sick Breaking News: “WHITE HOUSE REPORTEDLY ON RBG DEATHWATCH”
> The President is desperate to force Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg OFF the 
> Supreme Court. He’s already chosen her replacement!
> 
> AND Senator Mitch McConnell announced he’s ready to fill her spot.
> So John Lewis is taking a stand. He’s leading a petition to PROTECT Justice 
> Ginsburg from this President’s despicable plan, but he still needs 8,045 
> signatures to hit his 1O,OOO signature goal. Will you add your name right 
> now? →
> 
> PROTECT JUSTICE GINSBURG:
> SIGN NOW ➞
> Justice Ginsburg is the only thing stopping this President from demolishing 
> the rights of minorities, women, and LGBTQ Americans.
> 
> And the President’s pick to replace her is a devout conservative who would 
> join Brett Kavanaugh in ferociously attacking our rights and forcing a 
> far-right agenda on the nation.
> 
> We can’t let this happen, George -- we MUST fight back against injustice, 
> protect our rights, and save our futures!
> 
> Justice Ginsburg is our best defense against this President’s blatantly 
> dangerous agenda, so we REALLY need your signature to help John Lewis PROTECT 
> her seat at all costs. →
> PROTECT JUSTICE GINSBURG:
> SIGN NOW ➞
> Thanks for standing with John Lewis and Justice Ginsburg, George!
> 
> John Lewis HQ
> This message was sent to: grgo...@yahoo.com
> Click here to receive fewer emails. | Click here to unsubscribe.
> PAID FOR BY JOHN LEWIS FOR CONGRESS
> The following message is from Congressman John Lewis himself:
> 
> I can’t thank you enough for supporting my fight to restore justice in our 
> communities. 
> 
> 
> 
> Donate to John Lewis >>
> 
> I shed blood on the bridge in Selma, was beaten by angry mobs, and watched my 
> dear friends die in protest of injustice, our right to vote, and inequality. 
> Now I’m getting into Good Trouble each day in Congress fighting for our civil 
> liberties, affordable health care, and equal voting rights.
> 
> I know that when we celebrate our diversities, we can grow a stronger, more 
> accepting America. But this campaign is powered by supporters like you. And 
> your grassroots support is critical to helping me continue fighting for 
> justice and progress.
> 
> We believe that emails are a crucial way for our campaign to stay in touch 
> with dedicated supporters like you. If you'd like to receive fewer emails, 
> you can click here. If you'd like to help fund my efforts to restore justice 
> in our communities, please click below to donate: 
> 
> Donate to John Lewis >>
> 
> This message was sent to: grgo...@yahoo.com | Change or update your email 
> address by clicking here. I’d hate to lose your support, but if you’d still 
> like to unsubscribe from our emails, click here.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

FEK Captcha issue

[Jonathan Calloway]

Hello!

Does anyone have an idea when the captcha issue in FEK will be fixed?

. . Just course. . .


___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FEK requiring Captcha?

[Jonathan Calloway]

Good to know.  I guess I'll resort to doing the same.  Hope it is fixed soon!

Thank you!





Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 4, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Jonathan Calloway 
>> <jonathancallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> I was trying to do some update testing this morning.  However, I am getting 
>> a message in Fedora Easy Karma (FEK) that says it requires a Captcha key:
>> 
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
>> fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
>>   File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
>> karma)
>>   File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
>> res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 118, 
>> in wrapper
>> raise BodhiClientException(problems)
>> fedora.client.bodhi.BodhiClientException: You must provide a captcha_key.
> 
> That's this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445703
> 
> Unfortunately even if you delete all cache and authenticate again, it still 
> occurs after some time (at least for me). I had to resort to running 
> fedora-easy-karma just to detect which builds I want to provide karma on, but 
> use the web browser to actually give karma.
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FEK requiring Captcha?

[Jonathan Calloway]

Hello!

I was trying to do some update testing this morning.  However, I am 
getting a message in Fedora Easy Karma (FEK) that says it requires a 
Captcha key:


Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
   fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
   karma)
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
   res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
118, in wrapper

   raise BodhiClientException(problems)
fedora.client.bodhi.BodhiClientException: You must provide a 
captcha_key.


This happens when entering a comment while attempting to give positive 
Karma.


I noticed this in Fedora 24.  However, I had to re-build my Fedora 25 
Workstation VM, so it is a fresh install of Fedora 25 and it is doign 
the same thing.


Thanks!

Jonathan
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running karma on Fedora 24 Server

[Jonathan Calloway]

For the record:

epel  Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 
- x86_64 






> On Jun 24, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Calloway <jonathancallo...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Remove it from the repo list, so that f-e-k doesn’t look at it any more.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 24, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 12:52 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>>> I guess my question is, if I build a Fedora24 server and install a
>>> LAMP stack (Maria DB, PHP etc) so I can play with web-y stuff, and
>>> also use it to for QA testing, will the regular f-e-k process allow
>>> me to provide karma for those packages, assuming, of course, they are
>>> in bhodi?
>> 
>> It *should* do, yes. If it doesn't, that's a bug.
>> 
>>> If this is the case, I will remove REPL, as this is really what I’m after.
>> 
>> I'm not entirely clear what you mean by saying you will "remove REPL".
>> What did you install, exactly?
>> -- 
>> Adam Williamson
>> Fedora QA Community Monkey
>> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>> http://www.happyassassin.net
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running karma on Fedora 24 Server

[Jonathan Calloway]

Remove it from the repo list, so that f-e-k doesn’t look at it any more.




> On Jun 24, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 12:52 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> I guess my question is, if I build a Fedora24 server and install a
>> LAMP stack (Maria DB, PHP etc) so I can play with web-y stuff, and
>> also use it to for QA testing, will the regular f-e-k process allow
>> me to provide karma for those packages, assuming, of course, they are
>> in bhodi?
> 
> It *should* do, yes. If it doesn't, that's a bug.
> 
>> If this is the case, I will remove REPL, as this is really what I’m after.
> 
> I'm not entirely clear what you mean by saying you will "remove REPL".
> What did you install, exactly?
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running karma on Fedora 24 Server

[Jonathan Calloway]

I guess my question is, if I build a Fedora24 server and install a LAMP stack 
(Maria DB, PHP etc) so I can play with web-y stuff, and also use it to for QA 
testing, will the regular f-e-k process allow me to provide karma for those 
packages, assuming, of course, they are in bhodi?

If this is the case, I will remove REPL, as this is really what I’m after.





> On Jun 24, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 12:31 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> I am trying to run Fedora Easy Karma on a Fedora 24 server and I am
>> getting the following error:
>> 
>> Error while querying Bodhi: Invalid releases specified: EPEL-24
>> 
>> I did install EPEL 24, but I don’t understand why it would be
>> “invalid”.  I’ve tried “googling” this and cannot really find
>> anything for this error.
> 
> It thinks you're running RHEL or CentOS or another clone, not Fedora.
> EPEL is a set of repositories containing additional packages for RHEL
> (and clones) maintained by Fedora; basically if you maintain a package
> for Fedora, you can quite easily also build it for EPEL, if it would be
> useful to RHEL / CentOS users. So for some reason f-e-k thinks you're
> running RHEL and is looking for EPEL packages for RHEL 24 in
> Bodhi...which of course isn't going to work, since we're only actually
> up to RHEL 7 :)
> 
> The question would be why it's making this error, but I don't know why
> that might be off the top of my head...we'd have to look at the code it
> uses to detect your OS.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net <http://www.happyassassin.net/>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running karma on Fedora 24 Server

[Jonathan Calloway]

Yes.  I installed it because it contains server related packages that I want to 
be able to test.  Fedora Easy Karma  is an automation tool that lets you submit 
Karma from the command line. 




> On Jun 24, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Jos Vos <j...@xos.nl> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:31:28PM -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> 
>> I am trying to run Fedora Easy Karma on a Fedora 24 server and I am getting 
>> the following error:
> 
>> Error while querying Bodhi: Invalid releases specified: EPEL-24
>> 
>> I did install EPEL 24, but I don’t understand why it would be “invalid”.  
>> I’ve tried “googling” this and cannot really find anything for this error.
> 
> I've no idea what Fedora Easy Karma is, but EPEL is a repository
> of additional RHEL/CentOS packages and it has only releases up to 7.
> 
> -- 
> --Jos Vos <j...@xos.nl>
> --X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Office: +31 20 6938364
> --Amsterdam, The Netherlands|   Mobile: +31 6 26216181
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Running karma on Fedora 24 Server

[Jonathan Calloway]

Hello!

I am trying to run Fedora Easy Karma on a Fedora 24 server and I am getting the 
following error:

Error while querying Bodhi: Invalid releases specified: EPEL-24

I did install EPEL 24, but I don’t understand why it would be “invalid”.  I’ve 
tried “googling” this and cannot really find anything for this error.

Thanks!





___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: **URGENT** karma request (Wordpress)

[Jonathan Calloway]

Question - is there a place you can point me for adding the necessary repos for 
EPEL?

C


> On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Adam Williamson  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks! A critical security issue in Wordpress was just made public,
> and the Fedora and EPEL updates to fix it are not yet stable:
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0be7ce9e72
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-338a3f27e5
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-cc2d96d683
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-52eae70b76
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-0b96f86793
> 
> note, the issue in question is worse than any of those described in the
> update (it was not disclosed at time of release). Can people please
> karma these updates as fast as possible so they can go out? Given the
> severity of the issue I'd frankly suggest we just karma them all even
> if we have not tested each one separately. I have tested the F25
> package on my server and it works.
> 
> Thanks!
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

[Jonathan Calloway]

Adam,

You know what. . . I figured out what the problem was.  I ws using my email 
address instead of my FAS username.  I should have read the output a little 
closer. . . . self.login(self.username, self.password. . . . . that should have 
been a clue!

Jonathan




> On Jan 19, 2017, at 9:49 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 19:50 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to mark an update to 
>> Geary as failed, as the database is not pre-loading emails older than 2 
>> months:
> 
> Hum, that looks like it's failing to authenticate properly, I think. It
> may be that something's changed in the authentication path and easy-
> karma can no longer auth properly.
> 
> I can try and take a look into this in a bit, or there are other folks
> reading who could also do so, I'm sure.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

[Jonathan Calloway]

This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to "Pass" an update to 
Network Manager:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
karma)
  File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

result = method(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
270, in comment

'csrf_token': self.csrf()})
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

result = method(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
315, in csrf

self.login(self.username, self.password)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", 
line 289, in login

openid_insecure=self.openid_insecure)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidproxyclient.py", 
line 141, in openid_login

data=output['response'])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
518, in post

return self.request('POST', url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
475, in request

resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
585, in send

r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 
462, in send

raise RetryError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.RetryError: 
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='bodhi.fedoraproject.org', port=443): Max 
retries exceeded with url: 
/dologin.html?janrain_nonce=2017-01-20T00%3A32%3A57ZAcrbg7 (Caused by 
ResponseError('too many 500 error responses',))



Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway


On 01/19/2017 06:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:06 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:

Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?

Oh! Yes, sure, please do. Sorry, I completely missed the thing about
'strange Python errors'. I haven't had time to run easy-karma in a
while...

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

[Jonathan Calloway]

This example is from Fedora 25.  I was trying to mark an update to 
Geary as failed, as the database is not pre-loading emails older than 2 
months:


Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 831, in 
   fek = FedoraEasyKarma()
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 690, in __init__
   karma)
 File "/bin/fedora-easy-karma", line 815, in send_comment
   res = bc.comment(update["title"], comment, karma=karma)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

   result = method(*args, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
270, in comment

   'csrf_token': self.csrf()})
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
82, in wrapper

   result = method(*args, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line 
315, in csrf

   self.login(self.username, self.password)
 File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", 
line 289, in login

   openid_insecure=self.openid_insecure)
 File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/openidproxyclient.py", 
line 141, in openid_login

   data=output['response'])
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
518, in post

   return self.request('POST', url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
475, in request

   resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 
585, in send

   r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 
462, in send

   raise RetryError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.RetryError: 
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='bodhi.fedoraproject.org', port=443): Max 
retries exceeded with url: 
/dologin.html?janrain_nonce=2017-01-18T02%3A43%3A07ZcRMbTF (Caused by 
ResponseError('too many 500 error responses',))



I will send another example from F24 shortly.

Jonathan Calloway

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Adam Williamson 
<adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:06 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:

 Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?


Oh! Yes, sure, please do. Sorry, I completely missed the thing about
'strange Python errors'. I haven't had time to run easy-karma in a
while...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . 
net

http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Easy Karma

[Jonathan Calloway]

Thanks.  Can I send my output in this thread so you can look at it?

Thanks!

Jonathan 

> On Jan 19, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 17:22 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> Is anyone using Fedora Easy Karma?  I realize that Bhodi is the
>> preferred method of testing updates, but I really like the CLI
>> interface and the factt that it just ‘finds’ updates that have been
>> installed and presents them for testing. 
>> 
>> I have been wanting to start doing update testing again, and have an
>> F24 and an F25 VM devoted to this, but I keep getting strange Python
>> related errors on both. 
>> 
>> If I need to start using Bhodi I will, just wanted to ping the list
>> first!
> 
> Easy karma sends the feedback you enter to Bodhi, so you're really
> using both :) Many of us use easy-karma, it is absolutely an 'approved'
> way of doing update feedback, and much easier than the web interface
> for quickly providing feedback on multiple updates.
> 
> The only problem I have with it is we've never gotten around to
> updating it for Bodhi 2.x multiple feedback items, we really ought to
> do that...
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net <http://www.happyassassin.net/>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Easy Karma

[Jonathan Calloway]

Hello!

Is anyone using Fedora Easy Karma?  I realize that Bhodi is the preferred 
method of testing updates, but I really like the CLI interface and the factt 
that it just ‘finds’ updates that have been installed and presents them for 
testing. 

I have been wanting to start doing update testing again, and have an F24 and an 
F25 VM devoted to this, but I keep getting strange Python related errors on 
both. 

If I need to start using Bhodi I will, just wanted to ping the list first!

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

glibc in tet repos

[Jonathan Calloway]

Hello!

Has the glibc patch been placed in the test repos?

Thanks!

Jonathan

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 22 Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

That’s perfect!  I rebuild my vm’s for every new release, so I end up having to 
reference it a lot.

JC



 On Aug 8, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org 
 wrote:
 
 On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 18:06 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Adam,
 
 Could you, or whoever is responsible, update the main Fedora QA 
 updates page with this info?  It’s showing F22 Atomic.  I was 
 thinking when i was referencing it that the information listed there 
 was dated, so please correct me if I’m wrong!
 
 Um - if you mean https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing , I
 did it yesterday, when this thread happened. The Atomic section was
 added by someone else, I don't know what the correct commands for 23
 Atomic would be, but I updated the regular section (above it).
 
 Thanks!
 
 JC
 
 
 
 On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Adam Williamson 
 adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
 On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 05:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 08/08/15 05:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 17:45 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 I am having a difficult time configuring the testing 
 repositories 
 in 
 Fedora 22.  Would someone be willing to outline the proper 
 way to 
 do 
 this?
 dnf config-manger --enablerepo updates-testing
 
 should do it, I think.
 
 dnf config-manager --help-cmd suggests it would be
 
 dnf config-manager --set-enabled updates-testing
 
 Grrr. 'dnf config-manager --help' does not, of course, show that
 output. Thanks for the reminder!
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . 
 net
 http://www.happyassassin.net http://www.happyassassin.net/ 
 http://www.happyassassin.net/ http://www.happyassassin.net/
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net http://www.happyassassin.net/
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 22 Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Greetings!

I am having a difficult time configuring the testing repositories in Fedora 22. 
 Would someone be willing to outline the proper way to do this?

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 22 Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

That’s what I *thought* I was doing, but I kept getting sync errors.

In any case, thanks!!


JC



 On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org 
 wrote:
 
 On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 17:45 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 I am having a difficult time configuring the testing repositories in 
 Fedora 22.  Would someone be willing to outline the proper way to do 
 this?
 
 dnf config-manger --enablerepo updates-testing
 
 should do it, I think.
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 22 Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

This seems to have worked.  I’m not getting the caching errors anyway!

JC




 On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org 
 wrote:
 
 On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 05:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 08/08/15 05:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 17:45 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 I am having a difficult time configuring the testing repositories 
 in 
 Fedora 22.  Would someone be willing to outline the proper way to 
 do 
 this?
 dnf config-manger --enablerepo updates-testing
 
 should do it, I think.
 
 dnf config-manager --help-cmd suggests it would be
 
 dnf config-manager --set-enabled updates-testing
 
 Grrr. 'dnf config-manager --help' does not, of course, show that
 output. Thanks for the reminder!
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 22 Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Adam,

Could you, or whoever is responsible, update the main Fedora QA updates page 
with this info?  It’s showing F22 Atomic.  I was thinking when i was 
referencing it that the information listed there was dated, so please correct 
me if I’m wrong!

Thanks!

JC



 On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org 
 wrote:
 
 On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 05:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 08/08/15 05:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 17:45 -0400, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 I am having a difficult time configuring the testing repositories 
 in 
 Fedora 22.  Would someone be willing to outline the proper way to 
 do 
 this?
 dnf config-manger --enablerepo updates-testing
 
 should do it, I think.
 
 dnf config-manager --help-cmd suggests it would be
 
 dnf config-manager --set-enabled updates-testing
 
 Grrr. 'dnf config-manager --help' does not, of course, show that
 output. Thanks for the reminder!
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net http://www.happyassassin.net/
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

RE: Silly bodhi karma games

[Jonathan Calloway]

+1

I suggest giving us karma testers more in the way of test cases.  If it is 
possible to automate tests by scripting them, perhaps you could even add some 
elements of integration testing here.  I generally skip past updates that there 
is either not a test case for, something I've never heard of, or something I 
have no idea how to test.  I don’t' think it's fair to anyone to give positive 
karma for some library I can't even run a script or something against.

JC



-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Kamil Paral
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:56 AM
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
Subject: Re: Silly bodhi karma games

 I think it can be a judgement call on certain packages. For example, I 
 maintain the Review Board packages which almost never get karma from 
 more than one person (and that usually only for whichiver Fedora or 
 EPEL branch that person is currently deploying to). Even at karma 1, 
 most Review Board packages sit in updates-testing until the timeout 
 passes.

Just one note - the number of people giving karma is not the same as the number 
of people actually using that proposed package build. For example, some of 
system-critical libraries don't usually receive too much karma, because people 
are not sure how to test them, and whether running app X or Y is sufficient to 
test them. So they don't report any feedback for them. But if they have 
updates-testing enabled, they still test them at least unknowingly. If those 
libraries got broken, they would know it very fast, and bugs would get 
discovered. So, in this case, we have almost no positive feedback things 
work, but the important thing here is the absence of the negative feedback. 
And that's the purpose of the timeout.

This also applies to many leaf packages. We have many more people running with 
updates-testing than people regularly giving feedback to everything they have 
installed (my personal guess would be by several orders of magnitude). Even if 
the leaf package doesn't receive any karma, that timeout interval is very 
useful, because it gives people time to report issues, if they spot any. From 
my QA point of view, that timeout might be even more important than the 
feedback provided. And I have been very angry about some critical path packages 
pushing to stable with just 10 karma in _one or two days_. There are millions 
of Fedora users, with various hardware and software combinations - we can't 
afford to push something like kernel, mesa or X to stable if only 10 users give 
it a thumbs up. We need to let those hundreds or thousands of people running 
with updates-testing to install it as well, and give it the invisible thumbs 
up, which is not present in bodhi, but which is expressed by the lack of 
critical issues reported in bodhi, bugzilla or on mailing lists. And the best 
way to achieve that at the moment is to make the updates sit it updates-testing 
for at least a certain time.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 19 update testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Greetings!

Are we to continue doing update testing on F19?  I have been having a lot of 
problems with my F19 image(s) recently, and I’m really wanting to focus on F20, 
F21 Desktop, and F21 Server.  Besides, I can’t find a recent F19 report. 
Besides, I attempted to run updates against my newest F19 image yesterday, and 
there were none to install.  

I’m sure the Fedora Project officially still supports F19, but I’m not sure if 
we are still testing updates on it.

Thanks!

JC


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 19 update testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Thanks!  Now I can finally delete that pesky image!

JC



 On Mar 11, 2015, at 10:31 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
 
 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Calloway
 jonathancallo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 Are we to continue doing update testing on F19?  I have been having a lot of 
 problems with my F19 image(s) recently, and I’m really wanting to focus on 
 F20, F21 Desktop, and F21 Server.  Besides, I can’t find a recent F19 
 report. Besides, I attempted to run updates against my newest F19 image 
 yesterday, and there were none to install.
 
 I’m sure the Fedora Project officially still supports F19, but I’m not sure 
 if we are still testing updates on it.
 
 Nope, it's EOL.
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life
 
 Definitely proceed focusing on F20+.
 
 -- 
 Chris Murphy
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora Server Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Perfect!

I’m building the new images now!

JC



 On Mar 8, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
 
 On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Jonathan Calloway
 jonathancallo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 I’m thinking about moving two of my web servers from CentOS to Fedora 
 Server.  Do we “do” update testing for Fedora Server in the same way we do 
 it for F19-21, or is that a different list?
 
 Same test method, same test channel. All testing, all the time, right here.  
 :-D
 
 -- 
 Chris Murphy
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora Server Update Testing

[Jonathan Calloway]

Greetings!

I’m thinking about moving two of my web servers from CentOS to Fedora Server.  
Do we “do” update testing for Fedora Server in the same way we do it for 
F19-21, or is that a different list?

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

RE: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit

[Jonathan Calloway]

Adam,

The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found

JC



-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Adam Williamson
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 3:20 PM
To: test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit

Hi, folks!

We recently found out that there were some significant problems with PackageKit 
and things that use it (GNOME Software, Apper, gnome-
packagekit...) in Fedora 21, since the release of libhif-0.1.7 as an update 
shortly after F21 came out. The initial bug people noticed was offline updates 
failing to work, but in subsequent testing we found that regular package 
install and remove operations could cause crashes in PackageKit-based apps and 
it was possible for the PackageKit database to be corrupted.

It would be great if folks could, as a matter of urgency, test this
update:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif-
0.1.8-1.fc21

Please install the updated packages, reboot (or at least restart the packagekit 
service), run 'pkcon repair' as root, reboot again, and then test regular use 
of GNOME Software and pkcon as much as possible - try installing and removing 
packages, running offline updates, and so on. If your package set is up to date 
you can try downgrading a package in order to test offline updates - try 'yum 
downgrade devassistant', for instance, if you have it installed, then check for 
updates in GNOME Software.

As the bugs were pretty serious we'd like to release the fix as soon as 
possible, but at the same time we want to make sure we tested it thoroughly.

Thanks folks! And thanks a lot to Richard Hughes for working to fix this 
quickly, and Kamil for doing a lot of testing on it.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net 
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

RE: Karma in F20

[Jonathan Calloway]

Would you be willing to point me to the web interface?  Are you referring to 
the web interface for Bodhi?

Thanks!

JC



-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Andre Robatino
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:48 AM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Karma in F20

Jonathan Calloway jonathancalloway at gmail.com writes:

 I was trying to contribute some karma for F20.  However, it cannot 
 seem to
contact Bodhi.  Is it just me?
 
 [callowayj at localhost ~]$ fedora-easy-karma Getting list of 
 installed packages...
 Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F20)...
 [callowayj at localhost ~]$

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144587

f-e-k is useless most of the time, due to this. The web interface continues to 
work fine.




--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

RE: Karma in F20

[Jonathan Calloway]

Perfect!

Thank you very much!

JC



-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Andre Robatino
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 4:26 PM
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Karma in F20

Jonathan Calloway jonathancalloway at gmail.com writes:

 Would you be willing to point me to the web interface?  Are you 
 referring
to the web interface for Bodhi?

Yes, I was just referring to logging into bodhi.fedoraproject.org with your FAS 
account and giving karma one package at a time.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Karma in F20

[Jonathan Calloway]

Greetings!

I was trying to contribute some karma for F20.  However, it cannot seem to 
contact Bodhi.  Is it just me?

[callowayj@localhost ~]$ fedora-easy-karma
Getting list of installed packages...
Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F20)...
[callowayj@localhost ~]$ 


Thanks!

JC
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Test Case Response

[Jonathan Calloway]

Greetings!

I am working through update testing on F20.  I would like to know if
there is a way to respond specific test cases.  Specifically, I would
like to be able to add screen shots and steps for reproduction.  As it
is, I feel like I have to fail an entire update in Karma over one minor
issue with a test case.

For example, I was working through this test case for Gnome 3
Accessability:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Gnome_Accessibility

I came across what I percieve as a potential UI issue in the zoom
function.  It's minor, but I want to provide the feedback anyway.  Is
there a way that I can do this?

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19

[Jonathan Calloway]

Thank you!

Jonathan Calloway

Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
 
 On 03/05/14 15:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this 
 bug?
 
 Jonathan Calloway
 Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I
 don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has been
 correctly fixed, but as long as the update doesn't actually make
 anything *worse*, we can't hurt anything by getting it to stable ASAP,
 and I'm kinda figuring the RH security folks have verified the
 vulnerability fix already.
 
 Besides, maybe telling folks who don't know how to exploit the vulnerability 
 isn't such a good idea?  :-) :-)
 
 -- 
 Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19

[Jonathan Calloway]

Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this bug?

Jonathan Calloway

Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 
 Can folks with F19 boxes available please test and karma the F19
 incarnation of the gnutls security fix?
 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19
 
 As I'm sure most of you have seen by now, this is the fix for a
 significant and very high-profile security vuln, so if we can get it to
 stable ASAP that'd be great. thanks!
 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F20 and Rawhide: Headless install and enabling VNC

[Jonathan Calloway]

I’m wondering about this myself.  I use an F19 and F20 image, but I can’t get 
VNC to work on either.  

If anyone knows the trick, it would help me out as well.

JC


On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'*m working on some PXE and kickstart stuff to install headless servers for 
 F20 and Rawhide; did work so far.
 
 But is there any official way to enable VNC on a headless server ?
 
 I can ssh to this machines, but how do I access this machine via VNC ?
 
 I can enable VNC in the Gnome Control Center if I connect a monitor, but how 
 do I enable this via ssh ?
 
 /etc/sysconfig/vncserver seems to be gone since F19 ?
 
 cu romal
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Vmware won't compile

[Jonathan Calloway]

Lawrence,

Can you post the log there so we can see it?

JC


On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:06 PM, Lawrence E Graves lgrave...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am having trouble with my Vmware Workstation 10.0.1 module compiling on my 
 Dell Inspiron 9400 running 64 bit Fedora 20. I don't understand this read 
 out. Will someone please help?
 
 
 [lawrence67@jesuschrist ~]$ su -
 Password:
 Last login: Fri Feb 14 16:59:28 MST 2014 on pts/0
 [root@jesuschrist ~]# vmware-modconfig
 Logging to /tmp/vmware-root/vmware-modconfig-8267.log
 Icon name must be set.
 [
 
 -- 
 All things are workable but don't all things work.
 Prov. 3:5  6
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Vmware Workstation 10.0.1 will not compile with kernel 3.13.2-200.fc

[Jonathan Calloway]

My guess is something didn’t get built right. . . you’re getting folder not 
found errors. . 
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 [msg.dictionary.load.openFailed] Cannot open file 
 /home/lawrence67/.vmware/config: No such file or directory.


On Feb 14, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Lawrence E Graves lgrave...@gmail.com wrote:

 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Log for VMware Workstation 
 pid=3421 version=10.0.1 build=build-1379776 option=Release
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: The process is 64-bit.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Host codepage=UTF-8 
 encoding=UTF-8
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Host is Linux 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Msg_Reset:
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 [msg.dictionary.load.openFailed] Cannot open file /usr/lib/vmware/settings: 
 No such file or directory.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: PREF Optional preferences 
 file not found at /usr/lib/vmware/settings. Using default values.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Msg_Reset:
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 [msg.dictionary.load.openFailed] Cannot open file 
 /home/lawrence67/.vmware/config: No such file or directory.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: PREF Optional preferences 
 file not found at /home/lawrence67/.vmware/config. Using default values.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| W110: Logging to 
 /tmp/vmware-root/vmware-modconfig-3421.log
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Obtaining info using the 
 running kernel.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Created new pathsHash.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting header path for 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 to /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Validating path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for kernel release 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: using /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc 
 for preprocess check
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.573-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Preprocessed UTS_RELEASE, got 
 value 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.573-07:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for the kernel 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 is valid.  Whoohoo!
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmmon 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmnet 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the 
 vmblock module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmci 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vsock 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting vsock to depend on 
 vmci.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmmon.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.800-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 0.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.800-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmnet.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.804-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.804-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmblock.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.808-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.808-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmci.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.812-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.812-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vsock.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.816-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 0.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.829-07:00| vthread-3| I120: to be installed: vmnet 
 status: 0
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Obtaining info using the 
 running kernel.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting header path for 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 to /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Validating path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for kernel release 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: using /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc 
 for preprocess check
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.859-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Preprocessed UTS_RELEASE, got 
 value 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.859-07:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for the kernel 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 is valid.  Whoohoo!
 2014-02-14T18:30:08.084-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Kernel header path retrieved 
 from FileEntry: 

Re: Vmware Workstation 10.0.1 will not compile with kernel 3.13.2-200.fc

[Jonathan Calloway]

Lawrence,

You know, now that I think about it, I used to run VMWare Player in Fedora.  I 
always had trouble getting it to compile.  I found a thread somewhere that 
provided a way of modifying a config file so that it thought the version of 
Fedora it was running on was an older version, or something along those lines.  
I got it to work for a little while, but updating always seemed to break it.  
It has to do with the the kernel updates, which tend to cause VMWare Player and 
Workstation not to be able to compile on launch.

Honestly (and this is probably not the place to say this!) I would suggest not 
running VMWare Workstaiton inside Fedora.  Peronally, I’m running Fedora VM’s 
in ESXi.  It’s free, but a separate piece of hardware will require an 
investment.

Hope this helps!

JC




On Feb 14, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Lawrence E Graves lgrave...@gmail.com wrote:

 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Log for VMware Workstation 
 pid=3421 version=10.0.1 build=build-1379776 option=Release
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: The process is 64-bit.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Host codepage=UTF-8 
 encoding=UTF-8
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Host is Linux 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Msg_Reset:
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 [msg.dictionary.load.openFailed] Cannot open file /usr/lib/vmware/settings: 
 No such file or directory.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: PREF Optional preferences 
 file not found at /usr/lib/vmware/settings. Using default values.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Msg_Reset:
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 [msg.dictionary.load.openFailed] Cannot open file 
 /home/lawrence67/.vmware/config: No such file or directory.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: 
 
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.184-07:00| vthread-3| I120: PREF Optional preferences 
 file not found at /home/lawrence67/.vmware/config. Using default values.
 2014-02-14T18:30:06.188-07:00| vthread-3| W110: Logging to 
 /tmp/vmware-root/vmware-modconfig-3421.log
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Obtaining info using the 
 running kernel.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Created new pathsHash.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting header path for 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 to /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Validating path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for kernel release 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.558-07:00| vthread-3| I120: using /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc 
 for preprocess check
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.573-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Preprocessed UTS_RELEASE, got 
 value 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.573-07:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for the kernel 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 is valid.  Whoohoo!
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmmon 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmnet 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the 
 vmblock module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vmci 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Reading in info for the vsock 
 module.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting vsock to depend on 
 vmci.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.796-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmmon.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.800-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 0.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.800-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmnet.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.804-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.804-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmblock.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.808-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.808-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vmci.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.812-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 256.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.812-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Invoking modinfo on vsock.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.816-07:00| vthread-3| I120: /sbin/modinfo exited with 
 status 0.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.829-07:00| vthread-3| I120: to be installed: vmnet 
 status: 0
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Obtaining info using the 
 running kernel.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Setting header path for 
 3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 to /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include.
 2014-02-14T18:30:07.847-07:00| vthread-3| I120: Validating path 
 /lib/modules/3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64/build/include for kernel release 
 

Introduction

[Jonathan Calloway]

I am new to testing and QA, but not new to Linux.  I first began to work on 
UNIX/Linux in 2002, when I did some web server administration on a Solaris 
system.  I have used UNIX/LInux in several capacities ever since, including 
system administration.  

I taught Fedora and CentOS on the vocational/college level for 5 years.  Now I 
am ready to contribute to an open source project.

So, let me introduce myself.

My name is Jonathan Calloway.  I am 37 years old, and live near Chattanooga, 
Tennessee.  I have a wide range of experiences, including first and second 
level end user support so graphic and web design to system administration, 
technical writing, and process improvement.

Thanks!

Jonathan Calloway
calloway
jonathancallo...@gmail.com
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test