Re: Release validation testers: a question

[Kanika Murarka]

On 15 February 2017 at 14:46, John Dulaney 
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:02:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks! I've got a question for everyone who helps out with release
> > validation testing. It's related to the project to build a new system
> > for submitting those results. We have a ticket for designing that
> > system:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/design/issue/483
> >
> > and as part of the discussion there, we're wondering something. Given
> > that it's part of the new design that there's some kind of step where
> > you specify which particular image you're testing, does it make more
> > sense to you if you choose things in this order:
> >
> > 1. Pick a test to run
> > 2. Pick an image to run the test on
> >
> > Or this order:
> >
> > 1. Pick an image to test
> > 2. Pick a test to run on the image
> >
>
> I will prefer:-

1. Pick an image to test
2. Pick a test to run on the image

Thanks

___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Hey everyone,

The pagure repo[1] has been updated. Its ready for use. If you feel
something weird with issues or face some problem, please reply to this
thread.

[1] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa

Thanks for your patience
Kanika (a2batic)

On 30 January 2017 at 20:53, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 16:52 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adam,
> > Thanks for reaching out to Pingou. So we can continue the Migration.
>
> Yep, for sure.
>
> > > The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source
> > > code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and
> > > change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send
> > > Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update
> > > Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable
> > > submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra
> > > team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on
> > > that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and
> > > introduce you to the right people to talk to.
> >
> > I still need to update tags on some Pagure tickets, and then we can
> > go further. Sumantro said he can help in updating links on wiki. I
> > will surely ping you if I face some trouble.
>
> Absolutely, take it one thing at a time! I assigned the new tickets to
> you just for now, but if you and Sumantro want to split them up, that's
> fine too. And if anyone else from the group wants to help out, just
> speak up - there are some tickets in Pagure for the work described
> above.
>
> Thanks folks!
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

On 30 January 2017 at 15:08, Adam Williamson 
wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:46 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have
> > > fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff
> > > like:
> > >
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora
> > >
> > > but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own
> > > right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we
> > > should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in
> > > Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou?
> >
> > A relevant conversation:
> > https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/1773
>
> So I talked to Pingou this week at DevConf, and he seems fine with this
> setup. He's also generally fine with Kamil's ideas about how to display
> a page for all a namespace's projects even if there's this kind of
> conflict. So I think we're fine with keeping the fedora-qa project
> name. Thanks for working on it, Kanika!
>

Hi Adam,
Thanks for reaching out to Pingou. So we can continue the Migration.

>
> The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source
> code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and
> change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send
> Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update
> Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable
> submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra
> team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on
> that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and
> introduce you to the right people to talk to.
>

I still need to update tags on some Pagure tickets, and then we can go
further. Sumantro said he can help in updating links on wiki. I will surely
ping you if I face some trouble.

Thanks
Kanika(a2batic)

> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

On Jan 21, 2017 4:21 AM, "Adam Williamson" <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 14:36 +, Kanika Murarka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patience and sorry for the noise on mails. Fedora QA on
fedorahosted[1], has been successfully shifted to pagure[2]. Few tickets
are left for tagging, will be completed in this weekend.
> While going through repo, if you find something wrong, please reply to
this thread .
>
> [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
> [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa

Er...sorry, I should've realized we never settled the question of what
the new repository should be called.

What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have
fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff
like:

https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora

but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own
right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we
should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in
Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou?

A good next step for you (Kanika) would be to look for references to
Trac, and update them to point to Pagure instead, but we should
probably decide whether this will be the final location before updating
any links :)

Thanks for the work!


Thanks Adam, will be looking forward for Pingou's reply :)

--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Hi,

Thanks for the patience and sorry for the noise on mails. Fedora QA on 
fedorahosted[1], has been successfully shifted to pagure[2]. Few tickets are 
left for tagging, will be completed in this weekend.
While going through repo, if you find something wrong, please reply to this 
thread .

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa

Thanks
Kanika(a2batic)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

On 19 January 2017 at 17:15, Kamil Paral  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
> The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
> The repo includes following:-
> 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
> 2. There are 5 levels of priority:
>
>1. Blocker
>2. Critical
>3. Major
>4. Minor
>5. Trivial
>
>
> I'd personally simply use:
> 1. critical
> 2. normal
> 3. wishlist
>
> Thoughts? Or do we need the full set of priorities to convert existing
> tickets properly? (If we can influence it, blocker+critical would go to
> critical, major+minor+trivial would go to normal).
>
> We will go for this then. Starting with Migration :)

>
>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Hi,

The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC
The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
The repo includes following:-
1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
2. There are 5 levels of priority:

   1. Blocker
   2. Critical
   3. Major
   4. Minor
   5. Trivial

3. The keywords, component and type are mentioned as TAGS.

4. I have updated few tickets (#471, #472, #489, #491, #493, #494, #495,
#496) for demo.
[1]https://stg.pagure.io/test-fedoraqa-2

Feel free to suggest or report if anything seems wrong.

Regards
Kanika (a2batic)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Hi,

Sorry, It took a bit longer time.
The demo repository has been setted up here[1].
The repo includes following:-
1. Roadmap contains all the milestone.
2. There are 5 levels of priority:

   1. Blocker
   2. Critical
   3. Major
   4. Minor
   5. Trivial

3. The keywords, component and type are mentioned as TAGS.

4. I have updated few tickets (#471, #472, #489, #491, #493, #494, #495,
#496) for demo.

Please review the same and suggest changes.

[1]https://stg.pagure.io/test-fedoraqa-2

Regards
Kanika (a2batic)

On 11 December 2016 at 20:49, Kanika Murarka <murarkakan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Adam,
>
> +1 for that, it will give us more confidence to go ahead with pagure :). I
> will look into the available tools and start with it asap.
>
> Regards
> Kanika (a2batic)
>
>
>
> On 7 December 2016 at 02:35, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:13 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote:
>> > Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA
>> > tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for
>> > guiding .
>> > Following are the points:-
>> > 1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient.
>> > 2. Wiki -> overview
>> > 2. In the Pagure repo, priorities can be set for tickets based on
>> > ranking, e.g. 10=urgent,20=high,30=normal, etc.(we can have custom
>> > priorities)
>> > 3. Milestones> Pagure milestones(has been improved)
>> > 4. Roadmap
>> > *All the ticket with the tag roadmap will show up on the roadmap page.
>> > *For each milestones defined in the settings of the project, the
>> > roadmap will group tickets with the corresponding tag.
>> > *Tickets with the tag roadmap that are not associated with any of the
>> > milestones defined in the settings are group in an unplanned section.
>> >
>> > 5. All of the fields in both ticket type and ticket component are
>> > likely best implemented in tags for tickets. That would allow for the
>> > categorization and grouping of the tickets based on their keywords.
>> > 6. The blocked by and blocking feature is available in Pagure as
>> metadata.
>> > 7. All other things can be easily implemented using tags.
>> > 8. As discussed in the last meeting, https://pagure.io/pagure-importer
>> > can be used to import tickets.
>> >
>> > I am putting this as a mail because, I wont be able to attend the
>> meeting today.
>>
>> This all seems fine to me, and now F25 is past would be a great time to
>> do it. I've seen some other projects are able to do a 'test' import
>> into a disposable or playground Pagure instance, like
>> https://stg.pagure.io/ ; could we set up a test migration of fedora-qa
>> trac to see how it would look? Thanks!
>> --
>> Adam Williamson
>> Fedora QA Community Monkey
>> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>> http://www.happyassassin.net
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Hi Adam,

+1 for that, it will give us more confidence to go ahead with pagure :). I
will look into the available tools and start with it asap.

Regards
Kanika (a2batic)



On 7 December 2016 at 02:35, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:13 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote:
> > Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA
> > tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for
> > guiding .
> > Following are the points:-
> > 1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient.
> > 2. Wiki -> overview
> > 2. In the Pagure repo, priorities can be set for tickets based on
> > ranking, e.g. 10=urgent,20=high,30=normal, etc.(we can have custom
> > priorities)
> > 3. Milestones> Pagure milestones(has been improved)
> > 4. Roadmap
> > *All the ticket with the tag roadmap will show up on the roadmap page.
> > *For each milestones defined in the settings of the project, the
> > roadmap will group tickets with the corresponding tag.
> > *Tickets with the tag roadmap that are not associated with any of the
> > milestones defined in the settings are group in an unplanned section.
> >
> > 5. All of the fields in both ticket type and ticket component are
> > likely best implemented in tags for tickets. That would allow for the
> > categorization and grouping of the tickets based on their keywords.
> > 6. The blocked by and blocking feature is available in Pagure as
> metadata.
> > 7. All other things can be easily implemented using tags.
> > 8. As discussed in the last meeting, https://pagure.io/pagure-importer
> > can be used to import tickets.
> >
> > I am putting this as a mail because, I wont be able to attend the
> meeting today.
>
> This all seems fine to me, and now F25 is past would be a great time to
> do it. I've seen some other projects are able to do a 'test' import
> into a disposable or playground Pagure instance, like
> https://stg.pagure.io/ ; could we set up a test migration of fedora-qa
> trac to see how it would look? Thanks!
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Shifting fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure

[Kanika Murarka]

Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA
tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for
guiding .
Following are the points:-
1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient.
2. Wiki -> overview
2. In the Pagure repo, priorities can be set for tickets based on
ranking, e.g. 10=urgent,20=high,30=normal, etc.(we can have custom
priorities)
3. Milestones> Pagure milestones(has been improved)
4. Roadmap
*All the ticket with the tag roadmap will show up on the roadmap page.
*For each milestones defined in the settings of the project, the
roadmap will group tickets with the corresponding tag.
*Tickets with the tag roadmap that are not associated with any of the
milestones defined in the settings are group in an unplanned section.

5. All of the fields in both ticket type and ticket component are
likely best implemented in tags for tickets. That would allow for the
categorization and grouping of the tickets based on their keywords.
6. The blocked by and blocking feature is available in Pagure as metadata.
7. All other things can be easily implemented using tags.
8. As discussed in the last meeting, https://pagure.io/pagure-importer
can be used to import tickets.

I am putting this as a mail because, I wont be able to attend the meeting today.

Thanks and Regards
Kanika (a2batic)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

[Kanika Murarka]

+1 for the idea

On 20 June 2016 at 09:17, moon  wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-06-20 18:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 09:15 -0400, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> As I see so many new people coming in who wants to contribute and
>>> hence I propose to start with Hangouts where I will help new people
>>> get started with Fedora QA. So, this is open question to all new
>>> people , who wants me to go ahead with a hangout session.
>>
>> Just as a note, Fedora is usually uncomfortable with using proprietary
>> services for official purposes, but I think for an informal meeting
>> like this it should be no problem.
>>
>> We could use something like http://whenisgood.net/ to figure out a time
>> that works for everyone who's interested.
>>
>> The only other problem with a video/voice service is that some people
>> may not have the ability to use it, or if English is not their first
>> language, may be more comfortable with text. If anyone is in that
>> position, we can arrange an alternative session via IRC or something
>> similar, so please do speak up if you'd like this :)
>>
>> Thanks for this idea Sumantro!
>>
>
> https://openmeetings.apache.org/ I never used it so I don't know how it
> is, but it can hardly be any worse than hangouts
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Introduction mail: New Contibutor

[Kanika Murarka]

Hello,

I am Kanika Murarka. I am pursuing B.tech in Computer Science from IP
University, Delhi. Presently I am in final year. I have contributed in
Mozilla Delhi, pydsa and qutebrowser.

I had a conversation with Sumantro. He introduced me with contribution
to fedora and its different projects. I am looking forward to
contribute in Fedora.

I am interested to contribute in Graphic and back-end technologies. I
am good with HTML, CSS, JS, AngularJS, Photoshop, Illustrator.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org