f41-backgrounds available on both Rawhide and F41 branch
Hello everyone The default wallpaper for Fedora 41 (original for Fedora 40) is now available on both Rawhide and F41 repository. Users running either Rawhide or the branched Fedora 41 will immediately notice the changes after updates. A small but notable change is the disabled supplemental wallpapers sub-packages as the community submission remained inactive for a long time. In consequence, spins maintainers using the default wallpapers can safely remove that sub-package. Download for testers and users is on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=f41-backgrounds Regards, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Rebasing Blender 4.2 for Rawhide and Fedora 40
Hello team, Blender 4.2 currently failed on Rawhide due to Python 3.13 API changes and the issue is already reported[1]. Patch welcome. The plan is to build for Fedora 40 containing no major soversion changes. Users will notice majority of add-ons are now relocated as as extensions similar to GNOME approach [2]. Due to the minimal requirement for OpenImageIO 2.5 series from upstream, Fedora 39 will not receive update. In a future, Fedora n-1 will only receive LTS version. Additionally, the build failed on s390x architecture due endian issue with zstd-read file leading to temporarily exclusion.[3[ [1] https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/123871 [2] https://extensions.blender.org [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299704 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL9] Blender 3.3.3 available
After several attempts, Blender is finally available for EPEL9 as 3.3 LTS series. Major differences compared to its Fedora counterpart is the minimal dependencies based on blender_lite.cmake[2] thus light version. As the result, functions like Cycle Rendering will be unavailable but Eevee, Blender internal rendering, is by default. This release is basically a starting point to gradually implement missing dependencies needed for some other options. EPEL co-maintainers are welcome to further improve the support. References - [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac2da7e3bf [2] https://developer.blender.org/diffusion/B/browse/master/build_files/cmake/config/blender_lite.cmake -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Default wallpaper for Fedora 35 Release avail for testing
Hello everyone, A new version of default time of day wallpaper for Fedora 35 is available for testing and ready for the applications like Software needed to display the availability of Fedora 35. Link: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0d3eae84ae Let know if there are some issues needed to address before the final freeze on October 4. Regards, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora Linux 34 XPS 2-in-1 Tablet Mode
On 2021-03-19 10:51 a.m., Leander Hutton via test wrote: Anyone else with a similar style machine (Lenovo Yoga comes to mind) and 34 having luck with switching to tablet mode? Are there additional packages needed for convertibles now in GNOME 40? It's always worked right out of the box with Fedora since I've had the machine. As far as I can tell iio-sensor-proxy is running and monitor-sensor shows it detecting orientation changes, GNOME 40 just doesn't react to them. It is a regressing upstream bug from Mutter. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1686#note_1052162 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Please test f33-backgrounds-33.0.7
Hello team, Here is a new release of f33-backgrounds addressing a bug of broken symlink due to typo: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-27f80050a2 Thanks in advance for testing and adding karma! -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please test f33-backgrounds
Hello team, Please test f33-backgrounds with the updated default time of day wallpaper on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0c0496fb3e and add karma! Thanks in advance. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blender 2.90 release exclusive to 64 bits arch and Wayland
Blender 2.90 was released few week ago which a noticeable change, it is now exclusively available for 64 bits architecture meaning 32 bit arch support is discontinued by upstream. For that reason, the build will only apply for Rawhide and Fedora 33. Maintainers for armv7 architecture are welcome to bring improvement. Additionally, Blender 2.90 is the first release to include initial support of Wayland (currently disabled by default) meaning Wayland developers can help Blender team to effectively improve the codes. See the changes: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.90/More_Features The source build for the rpm version is on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: f33-backgrounds available in the repository
On 2020-08-20 1:11 a.m., Alessio wrote: On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 21:55 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team and testers, f33-backgrounds is now available for testing in Fedora 33 repository. The image appears cutted up and down. https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/screenshot/f33background.png Ciao, A. The update is available with the fixes. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cdb505f91b -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
f33-backgrounds available in the repository
Hello team and testers,
f33-backgrounds is now available for testing in Fedora 33 repository.
The major change is the time of day enabled by default (default animated
background) on Workstation Edition and Design Suite Labs. As a result,
the animated subpackage is eliminated from this release.
For users running on different desktop environments, both MATE and
Cinnamon inherit that function and their respective spin maintainers can
optionally enable. Selecting a a separate default background with their
time of day version is now possible for KDE and XFCE which lacks support
of time of day features. Developers are free to provide a patch to enable.
For installation on GNOME or Cinnamon,
sudo dnf install f33-backgrounds-{base,gnome}
For MATE,
sudo dnf install f33-backgrounds-{base,mate}
For KDE,
sudo dnf install f33-backgrounds-{base,kde}
For XFCE,
sudo dnf install f33-backgrounds-{base,xfce}
Thank you for testing
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test-Announce] RIP: Thomas Gilliard (satellit)
I just checked the e-mail and was saddened to read the new about satellit. He helped me reviewing some of my packages. All condolences to his family. On 2020-08-02 6:40 p.m., Geoffrey Marr wrote: Sad to hear this. You will be missed. Geoff Marr IRC: coremodule On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Dennis Gilmore <mailto:den...@ausil.us>> wrote: This is very sad news, he was a very enthusiastic tester. Dennis On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 5:49 PM Adam Williamson mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > Hi, folks. I'm sad to report that Thomas Gilliard (satellit), who was a > valued member of the QA team for many years, passed away last week. His > wife contacted me with the news. Thomas was a regular and reassuring > presence at QA and blocker review meetings and ran many thousands of > tests since he first joined the team in 2009. He was particularly > dedicated to testing our Sugar builds. We'll miss him. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ > test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:de...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:de...@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Update for f32-backgrounds
An updated f32-backgrounds 32.1.4 will be available after Fedora 32 release for addressing the zoom issue related to the default static backgrounds. With some input from spin maintainers, the symbolic link for the default background is fixed. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-717e28aadb -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
updated f32-backgrounds available
Hello team, An updated f32-backgrounds package is available for testing which includes its time of day version. A dummy supplemental wallpaper is available upon request from maintainers of other desktop environments. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-97bd7c2cd2 Happy testing -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
f32-backgrounds available for testing
Hello team, f32-backgrounds is available for testing on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv, tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day theme) using system settings thus tremendously saving space. Happy testing. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
xournalpp available for testing
Hello team, Xournal++, a spiritual successor of xournal (the original author even recommended it) is now available in the testing repository: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=xournalpp Please give karma to quickly make it available on the stable release. The good part is both xournal and xournalpp can coexist. Thanks in advance -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
[HEADS-UP] f31-backgrounds ready for testing
Hello team, f31-backgrounds package is now available for testing on all supported desktop environments. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8b2cccfabf Both supplemental wallpapers and animated default background (time of day) are included as well. Give positive karma to make it available on stable repository of Fedora 31. Thanks to reviewers and other contributors for the hep. Luya 0x5E528174D8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
f30-backgrounds updated with animated wallpapers
Hello team, New version of f30-backgrounds is available with animated default wallpapers ready for testing. See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/f30-backgrounds-30.1.0-1.fc30 Regards, Luya ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F30 backgrounds
On 2019-03-02 11:54 a.m., pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> I thought I would tryout the F30 backgrounds. I got the
> f30-backgrounds-30.0.0.tar.xz file and extracted the f30-backgrounds-30.0.0
> folder. > > Then I found the /usr/share/backgrounds folder on my F30 test
system. I saw an f29 folder there, but decided not to change that but
instead made a new f30 folder in the /usr/share/backgrounds folder on
the f30 system. The default folder from the down load was copied into
the new f30 folder on the f30 system. > > Then I copied the remaining
items (folders with files and single files as received in the download
to the /usr/share/backgrounds folder on the f30 system. After that I
rebooted the f30 system. When the reboot was complete, I opened g-c-c
and opened the backgrounds tab and clicked the Background thumbnail.
When the selection window popped up I selected Wallpapers and scrolled
through the available images. The new images were not available. > >
Somehow I knew it couldn't be that simple. Is it complicated enough that
the new backgrounds really need to be installed using DNF somehow, or
could I do something to make it work? > > Hello Pat,
Have you copied the xml files in
/usr/share/backgrounds/f30/{default,extras}?
The easier ways is currently available on COPR repository:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/f30-backgrounds/builds/
Luya
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Please test mesa builds powered by meson (Rawhide)
On 2018-12-04 1:12 p.m., Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello, > > it's been a long time when Mesa added meson buildsystem definitions, > but I never got time to switch Fedora's mesa build to use them. > Nowadays, mesa upstream is looking to drop autotools definitions in > 19.0.0 release, so time came up. > > I've prepared 18.0.0~rc5 builds with using meson buildsystem instead > of autotools: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ignatenkobrain/meson-mesa/ > > Please test it and let me know if something doesn't work as expected. > > P.S. Builds are available just for rawhide. > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Running this meson built mesa 18.0.0~rc5 on an updated Fedora 29. Everything is working without noticeable issue. Luya 0x5E528174D8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Touchscreen support for HP Envy x360 AMD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello team, Few months ago I brought a HP Envy x360 to try the touchscreen function and also the stylus. Unfortunately, an outstanding bug has a misconfigured ACPI table in all kernel versions starting with that message: [ 2.850139] amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to get gpio IRQ: -22 [ 2.850190] amd_gpio: probe of AMDI0030:00 failed with error -22 in combination of [ 5.013840] ACPI Error: Field [D128] at bit offset/length 128/1024 exceeds size of target Buffer (160 bits) (20180810/dsopcode-201) [ 5.013845] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \HWMC, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013852] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.WMID.WMAA, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013890] ACPI Error: Field [D128] at bit offset/length 128/1024 exceeds size of target Buffer (160 bits) (20180810/dsopcode-201) [ 5.013893] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \HWMC, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013897] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.WMID.WMAA, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013933] ACPI Error: Field [D128] at bit offset/length 128/1024 exceeds size of target Buffer (160 bits) (20180810/dsopcode-201) [ 5.013936] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \HWMC, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013940] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.WMID.WMAA, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.013999] input: HP WMI hotkeys as /devices/virtual/input/input11 [ 5.014014] r8822be: rtlwifi: wireless switch is on [ 5.014235] ACPI Error: Field [D128] at bit offset/length 128/1024 exceeds size of target Buffer (160 bits) (20180810/dsopcode-201) [ 5.014240] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \HWMC, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.014247] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.WMID.WMAA, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.014299] ACPI Error: Field [D128] at bit offset/length 128/1024 exceeds size of target Buffer (160 bits) (20180810/dsopcode-201) [ 5.014303] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \HWMC, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) [ 5.014309] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \_SB.WMID.WMAA, AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20180810/psparse-516) The bug is filed to upstream where one of users managed to create a workaround on that comment: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198715#c14 I vainly attempted to build using the kernel as the suggestion understandably needs refinement. Will someone take a look to build a test kernel and possibly refine a patch ready to submit for upstream? Thanks, Luya -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWyB+BQtYiFz4GUNDXlKBdNiiYJoFAlvuRrQACgkQXlKBdNii YJq85wf+NBFwK2HR72Y+tGplW5BF6aMswo6uJTosMUTKYIBEE1qAaddphmEjFYmw v1oE4TZz9zk2xtPCnLNo1Fng8+Dz+fJfgEnhDIlyuuBD1yyaMq626ZJw2nMI2y0C JVxQIsubtDr9nnB3l7U4e4izcFs6usrw/GWpKy8Nei49KHOe5MdqN+SyOG0u8gYn o5sF7AmA50vgrj1Wekb6wFfDqAgjAaqA3OYV1OvyHolE96sXJHOlSrPMBvP4KeE4 H7Z2YUwPkieLEVMGMDN/2LTVTXhRQizfaAj+IabC1YXYt6x5E/6hZJx9/l5Dhpt6 2w/Ep6bvbPtyrpOX+PZAeDb7/wj+Zw== =sjgA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
fPlease test updated f29-backgrounds
Hello team, f29-backgrounds is updated to 29.1.0 with enabled animated default wallpaper allowing time of day function. Please test on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/f29-backgrounds-29.1.0-1.fc29 install animated wallpaper with the command: 'sudo dnf install f29-backgrounds-animated' and add/substract karma. Thank you -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Important] Need testers for updated Blender
Hello AMD hardware testers, Please test this updated Blender using upstream patch that resolved the flickering issues on user interface happening on both Wayland and Xserver affecting AMD users. F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4ee520d53 F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e827f09c86 Make sure to set File → User Preferences → Window Draw Method: Automatic See https://developer.blender.org/T49945 for more details. Thank you in advance -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please test f25-backgrounds
Hello team, f25-backgrounds is now submitted in update-testing [1] as beta freeze schedule is set for tomorrow (Tuesday). Please give a karma to make available on stable repository. Thank you Reference - [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01b667a139 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue
On 18/08/16 02:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 21:37 +0000, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> Test done on a >> AMD powered laptop: ASUS X550ZE, AMD A10 7400P with Dual Radeon. >> The system successfully booted to GNOME Wayland Session >> >> Desktop system >> Identical motherboard from the bug reporter with AMD Phenom II X4 940 and >> Nvidia GTX460 v2 Fermi, >> Fedora successfully booted to GNOME Wayland Session. >> >> Common occurrence is SELinux permission related to some systemd components >> during the boot. > Thanks a lot for testing! Please report the selinux alerts if they're > not already reported :) > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Done =) Some of them are already reported. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue
Test done on a AMD powered laptop: ASUS X550ZE, AMD A10 7400P with Dual Radeon. The system successfully booted to GNOME Wayland Session Desktop system Identical motherboard from the bug reporter with AMD Phenom II X4 940 and Nvidia GTX460 v2 Fermi, Fedora successfully booted to GNOME Wayland Session. Common occurrence is SELinux permission related to some systemd components during the boot. Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 25 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting, Thursday, August 18 @ 19:00 UTC
On 15/08/16 06:32 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for the Fedora 25 Alpha > Release Readiness Meeting meeting. > > The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, August 18, 2016 19:00 > UTC. Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone. > > We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Alpha > release of Fedora 25 on Tuesday, August 23nd, 2016. Please note that > this meeting is going to be held even if the release is delayed at the > Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours earlier. > > You may received this message several times, but it is by purpose to > open this meeting to the teams and to raise awareness, so hopefully > more team representatives will come to this meeting. This meeting > works best when we have representatives from all of the teams. > > [FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4486/ > > More information available at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness_Meetings > > Thank you for your support and Regards, Jan I will try to make it. It will be noon PDT here. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F24 Beta status
On 27/04/16 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > with F24 Beta: > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > can spin a 'release candidate': > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > > a kernel is building that is expected to fix the first, and hughsie is > testing a fix for the second as we speak. Once we have both fixes in > bodhi I'll request a release candidate compose and we'll hopefully have > time to blow through testing ahead of go/no-go. > > Note the list of 'proposed blockers' at > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/beta/buglist is > not entirely accurate; it includes bugs that are Accepted0Day or > AcceptedPreviousRelease. Real proposed blockers are > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330941 , which is not a > big problem we just need to fix the Workstation spec, and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329342 , which could do > with votes (but has a fix, so if we accept it we're not blocked from > spinning the RC). > > So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all > goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the > current nightly, but we'll at least need to do sanity testing and make > sure we cover the few Beta tests which have not been run recently. Also make sure to use the latest version of f24-backgrounds (24.1.1-1) which includes changes from default wallpapers and its supplements. Do I need to add it as Beta Blocker? -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please test f24-backgrounds-24.1.1
Hello testers and team, f24-backgrounds is updated with new version of default wallpapers in addition of its supplements. 24.1.1-1 is now pushed rather than 24.1.0-1 because of the recent changes based on feedback from Gnome Software maintainer. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b5b1c46d5f Please test it out from your favourite desktop environment for possible bugs. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net 0xD8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please test f24-backgrounds
Hello team, f24-backgrounds now includes supplemental wallpapers in time for the beta release of Fedora 24. Look at the update, test it out and report possible bugs: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5879f6ba68 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: f24-backgrounds ready for testing
On 22/03/16 04:14 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > On 03/11/2016 01:44 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> Hello teams, >> >> f24-backgrounds package is submitted for testing on F24 repository. At >> this time of writing the status is on pending. > Any idea when the supplemental wallpapers submissions will be reviewed? > > Mukundan. > > > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Looking at Fedora Magazine article, voting will start on April 11 until April 22, 2016. See https://fedoramagazine.org/get-wallpaper-in-fedora-24/ -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net 0xD8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: f24-backgrounds ready for testing
According to the Nuancier schedule, the review will start after April 11. The Design team schedule is not up to date at the moment. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
f24-backgrounds ready for testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello teams, f24-backgrounds package is submitted for testing on F24 repository. At this time of writing the status is on pending. Please let know if there is any bug to address. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9506354e5b P.S.: It looks like Softpedia already posted an article related on wallpaper: http://news.softpedia.com/news/fedora-24-linux-default-wallpaper-revealed-to-be-included-in-fedora-24-alpha-501608.shtml - -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW4xITAAoJEF5SgXTYomCaZXwH/RsocnjdA10acJNDOdACZANO rvWHtJaS6ZnqP2cfBf5QsESZ2xpaS+c+0PGkbNXqsymJzGitULtC0TXTteVD0mFs swJu8dYupPpMXkjHv8lLkgxwELrctfxgpYvkPHVX5hss0w4C/pnUL3FyiUtEbqX0 XF2MXpenaL/JZ0RIGN+UwIid5DAdN3/CmmHD/RxLO6mNdz1SokN1Zs737B6jQ0er PmA1ICbyeGp72Tp38pZgTtxe6J2hLmJqdjA4mzUESg/RlmJ1BjI6FEjB/C26Ezn3 Yz6RA0D9i5jHVBtd977C+bit5OREexN1RShcJe0fhrdbj18o8uOESwFYJPEJWD4= =QDCD -END PGP SIGNATURE- 0xD8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing request: gdm-on-Wayland on hybrid graphics laptops (esp. Macbooks)
On 14/05/15 01:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > We have a somewhat-worrying proposed blocker for F22: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218787 > > it appears that after a successful installation of Workstation on the > affected system, GDM-on-Wayland fails to start correctly but also does > not fall through (as it should) to GDM-on-X, leaving the user with a > black screen and no obvious way to proceed. This is obviously a bad > bug, but so far it has only been observed on one test system (a Macbook > Pro 8,2) by one tester. A few other testers have tried to reproduce on > other hybrid graphics systems, but have not been able to. > > It would be very helpful to get some more data here. If anyone has a > hybrid graphics laptop and can spare some space (or perhaps attach an > external drive) for a test F22 install, can you please try installing > F22 Workstation TC3 and creating a user: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_TC3/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora- > Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-TC3.iso > > then boot the installed system, and see if GDM appears correctly? > Thanks. > > Note there is a different bug which causes GDM-on-Wayland to flicker on > some hardware: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218688 > > that's something different, and is a bit further along in the > diagnosis/fix process, so we probably don't need further reports of > that one (though once a fix arrives, it'd be good to have folks test > it). > > If you find you seem to be affected by the bug, please add your details > to the report. If you test and find you're *not* affected by the bug - > you see GDM properly - please reply to one of the mailing lists, so we > can get some idea of the proportions of affected vs. non-affected > testers. Thanks a lot for your help, folks! I have a hybrid laptop AMD-Quad Core A10 Kaveri and Dual Radeon GPU. GDM on Wayland runs smoothly other than know issues like Drag and Drop. I think the issue is possibly on Intel based hybrid laptop. Prior to beta and thanks to the team work notably halfline, GDM on X bug was fixed. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [ASUS] Laptop issue with hotkeys
On 10/05/15 01:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 05/10/2015 03:27 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> The problem is mostly related to ASUS laptop. i would like if any user >> have their hotkeys work out of box. >> Mine somehow refuses to work even though the drivers correctly detected >> it as asus-nb-wmi. See >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206862 > > Try adding "acpi_osi=" to your kernel boot command arguments. > > Example: >linuxefi /vmlinuz-foo ... acpi_osi= Unfortunately, adding that command argument led to a blank screen. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[ASUS] Laptop issue with hotkeys
The problem is mostly related to ASUS laptop. i would like if any user have their hotkeys work out of box. Mine somehow refuses to work even though the drivers correctly detected it as asus-nb-wmi. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206862 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net 0xD8A2609A.asc Description: application/pgp-keys -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Belated notifications?
On 28/04/15 02:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:06:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Software and dnf use separate metadata caches and refresh schedules, >> so this kind of mismatch is not unusual (though it does seem to always >> surprise people). > How would that explain it? I did enter a notification about updates > being available, didn't it? Even if the metadata were old, they would > need to contain upgrades compared with the local RPM database, or else > an update-check would fail and there would _not_ be a notification about > updates. > > Last DNF based update has been _four_ (!) days ago, so why did I > receive a notification about software updates being available when > gnome-software thinks everything is up-to-date? I wonder if there is a mechanism that notify Gnome Software via pkcon to refresh the status after dnf did the update. I would think such mechanism would be in place already and such task done automatically. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [f22] Latest libwbclient update broke gnome-control-center
On 24/04/15 02:20 AM, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> Version 4.2.1-2 of libwbclient on Fedora 22 beta broke >> gnome-control-center meaning unable to access other options. I am >> unable >> to revert to change and stuck with that version. Is there a >> workaround >> for that issue? > > You can: > # update-alternatives --install /usr/lib64/libwbclient.so.0.12 libwbclient.so.0.12-64 /usr/lib64/samba/wbclient/libwbclient.so.0.12 10 > > This is the second time this happens to this fragile custom > alternatives setup in the samba rpms. The last time it was in a stable > f21 update. > > Regards > Yanko First time I heard about update-alternatives. Anyway, I managed to downgrade libwbclient after finding out the missing needed package. Thanks for the suggestion. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net Using metadata from Fri Apr 24 02:38:33 2015 (6:50:17 hours old) Transaction ID : 12 Begin time : Fri Apr 24 09:17:41 2015 Begin rpmdb: 2034:e3ce6a98762ae86073de9d4434ca38f0516dfdf5 End time :09:17:55 2015 (14 seconds) End rpmdb : 2034:01282ff9eea42d2911241147c340c21d4c4e6bc4 User : Luya Tshimbalanga Return-Code: Success Command Line : downgrade samba-client-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-client-libs-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-common-4.2.0-3.fc22.noarch.rpm samba-common-libs-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-libs-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-winbind-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-winbind-clients-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm samba-winbind-modules-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm libwbclient-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm libsmbclient-4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm Transaction performed with: Installed dnf-0.6.5-1.fc22.noarch(unknown) Installed rpm-4.12.0.1-9.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Packages Altered: Downgrade libsmbclient-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade libwbclient-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 (unknown) Downgrade samba-client-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade samba-client-libs-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade samba-common-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.noarch @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.noarch @updates-testing Downgrade samba-common-libs-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade samba-libs-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64@@commandline Downgraded2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64@updates-testing Downgrade samba-winbind-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade samba-winbind-clients-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing Downgrade samba-winbind-modules-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 @@commandline Downgraded 2:4.2.1-2.fc22.x86_64 @updates-testing -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[f22] Latest libwbclient update broke gnome-control-center
Version 4.2.1-2 of libwbclient on Fedora 22 beta broke gnome-control-center meaning unable to access other options. I am unable to revert to change and stuck with that version. Is there a workaround for that issue? -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 22 Workstation Beta RC2 report
The following test is done on ASUS X550ZE laptop Booting: -- This version fixes a issue related to hybrid graphics hardware (Dual Radeon that equips ASUS X550ZE). The boot went to the Gnome Session. Devices: --- All devices are correctly detected and working except: - Touchpad (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208625) - currently investigating with Hans - Hotkeys (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206862) - Power Management seems unoptimized on Radeon driver as the laptop lasts at most two hours. Applications --- - Starting any Libre Office applications will cause a crash on X session, bug report has already been submitted (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210931) - Cheese runs fine but traceback after closing it (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208535) - Gnome on Wayland runs fine with known issues such as copy and paste between Wayland apps and its XWayland counterpart, Cheese and Totem unable to start. -- *Luya Tshimbalanga* Fedora Design Team Design Suite spin maintainer -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 22 Workstation Beta Release Candidate 1
On 09/04/15 07:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We don't think it's 'AMD users', because we've tested other systems > with AMD graphics adapters and they work fine. But it *may* be 'hybrid > graphics laptops', which would be something of a problem because > there's a lot of those. > After reading the comments on bug report about similar issues with both Intel and Nvidia, I understand it is hybrid graphics laptop issue. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 22 Design Suite Beta TC7
Running the live media Fedora 22 Design Suite Beta TC7 which is based from Workstation version. Booting process led to an abrupt stop of slice user 1000. It appears a permission issue from X session found on this report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206733 It seems the fix from Hans (http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/15767.html) did not make into that version. Note that some applications like Video and LibreOffice will crash after applying update. The ASUS X550Z still has issue with non working hot-keys (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206862) and broken Touch pad(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208625) meaning a kernel issue in some sort. -- *Luya Tshimbalanga* Fedora Design Team Design Suite spin maintainer -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 22 Beta TC6 Live Media on ASUS X550ZE
On 02/04/15 11:00 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > It turned out a regression from xserver 1.17 on Fedora 22. Fedora 21 > Live Media successfully booted into Gnome Session with xserver 1.16. I > updated the bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206733 > Following the http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/15767.html, the laptop can now run Gnome Session. One bug down, more to go from touchpad to hotkeys -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 22 Beta TC6 Live Media on ASUS X550ZE
It turned out a regression from xserver 1.17 on Fedora 22. Fedora 21 Live Media successfully booted into Gnome Session with xserver 1.16. I updated the bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206733 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On 28/03/15 01:40 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi drago01, > > If I login on my F22 box to a gnome on wayland session, no nautilus is > running (maybe it crashed when loggin in), so no menu appears (for > example for "Open terminal") if clicking the right mouse button. So I > can't confirm that nautilus is running well :-( > > If the trying to start nemo, then nemo dumps core: > Glib: ERROR:ghash.c:373:g_hash_table_lookup_node: assertion failed: > (hash_table->ref_count >0) > Aborted (core dumped) > > Kind regards > > Joachim Backes Running Nautilus well on Gnome on Wayland. Test done of ASUS X550ZE laptop. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora Workstation 21 Alpha TC5 Live media crash on Intel 945GM
Attempting to run Fedora workstation 21 Alpha TC5 led to a crash at the login screen with "Oh no! Something went wrong!". Test is done on a powered Intel 945GM laptop. The same system runs on the latest update of Fedora 20 featuring Gnome Shell 3.10.2. Bugzilla report below: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136703 Posted following Ankur Sinha aka FranscisoD's suggestion. -- *Luya Tshimbalanga* Fedora Design Team Design Suite spin maintainer -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Installation Question
On Sun 20 Jan 2013 05:37:57 AM PST, Lawrence Graves wrote: > Why is it that the new installation system will not load the current > kernel out? It always loads the 3.6.10-4 kernel. > -- > All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6 How did you install the system? DVD or network through closest mirror? -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[follow-up] Setting wireless network HP printer issue
On 07/01/13 10:07 AM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: firewall-config needs to have: ipp, ipp-client, smb-client, mdns holes for network discovery to work. Note, ipp based discovery may be turned off at the server level and may need to be manually changed via CUPs server setting changes. http://localhost:631/admin/ An update of wireless network issue on HP Photosmart eStation C510a. The cause of issue was the router itself. After restarting it, Gnome printer setting was able to detect my printer on the network. The ip address of that printer display its web interface. Another problem was the network scanner. I had to check the printer configuration using system-config-printer and run the setting to make sure everything went smoothly. This time the Device URI is "hp:/net/Photosmart_eStn_C510_series?zc=HPFFBBC9" instead of "socket://192.168.1.67:9100" as read by printer setting from gnome-control-center. Network scan can be now read by simple-scan. Interesting enough, hp-probe is broken because it cannot detect eStation C510a on the network. Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On Fri 04 Jan 2013 05:32:16 PM PST, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, you really should telnet to port 9100 which is the jetdirect port. But, if the connection were reaching the printer and the printer port isn't being used you'd get telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.195: Connection refused telnet: connect to address 192.168.1.67: No route to host indicates a network issue of some sort. It could be a firewall issue on the fedora side. However, outbound connections aren't normally blocked. Definitely a firewall issue on Fedora 18 side because telnet displayed above result. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On 04/01/13 05:08 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 04/01/13 04:35, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: No luck. On my network, HP eStation ip address is 192.168.1.67 with network name HPFFBBC9. Somehow, hp-setup does not detect the printer presence in wireless netowrk (it did on F17). I am puzzled why hp-setup failed on F18. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer I find that CUPS works simplest for me. In browser localhost:631 login as root at the CUPS prompt or else it wont let you do anything. Add Printer > AppSocket/HP JetDirect In my system the address for an HP C-6800 is socket://192.168.1.11:9100 Then follow menu items for manufacturer and model. I used the same procedure for the two Brother laser printers also. Just added the HP printer in F-18 and printed test page without a problem. Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box7 No luck so far. Possibly a firewall issue then. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On 04/01/13 05:08 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 04/01/13 04:35, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: No luck. On my network, HP eStation ip address is 192.168.1.67 with network name HPFFBBC9. Somehow, hp-setup does not detect the printer presence in wireless netowrk (it did on F17). I am puzzled why hp-setup failed on F18. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer I find that CUPS works simplest for me. In browser localhost:631 login as root at the CUPS prompt or else it wont let you do anything. Add Printer > AppSocket/HP JetDirect In my system the address for an HP C-6800 is socket://192.168.1.11:9100 Then follow menu items for manufacturer and model. I used the same procedure for the two Brother laser printers also. Just added the HP printer in F-18 and printed test page without a problem. Bob Althought printer works, scanner does not :( -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On Fri 04 Jan 2013 05:13:23 AM PST, Ed Greshko wrote: I would be puzzled too. I suppose I wasn't clearbut I set up my HP printer using hp-setup and I am on F18 as well Can you telnet to the printer as shown above? If not, then the problem is a network issue. $ telnet 192.168.1.67 Trying 192.168.1.67... telnet: connect to address 192.168.1.67: No route to host Doing similar setting on Windows 7 works though. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 11:51:33 PM PST, Ed Greshko wrote: FirewallD is enabled, network is on. Not familiar with that printer. Running "hp-setup" After selecting "Network/Ethernet/Wireless network" did you "Show Advanced Options" and then check "Manual Discovery" and enter the IP address? You can ping the printer? Also, you should be able to. telnet printer.ip 9100with 9100 being the first jetdirect port. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ telnet hp 9100 Trying 192.168.0.195... Connected to hp. Escape character is '^]'. ^] telnet> close Connection closed. No luck. On my network, HP eStation ip address is 192.168.1.67 with network name HPFFBBC9. Somehow, hp-setup does not detect the printer presence in wireless netowrk (it did on F17). I am puzzled why hp-setup failed on F18. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Setting wireless network printer issue
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 07:07:00 PM PST, Ed Greshko wrote: What make/model of printer? It may not be apples/oranges, but I have an HP 6500 connected via wireless. I used hplip and had to enter the IP address since discovery failed to find it. Working fine for both printing and scanning. HP Photosmart eStation C150. I attempt to use hplip to connect wireless using ip address with no success. Probing network for printers. Please wait, this will take approx. 10 seconds... warning: No devices found on the 'net' bus. If this isn't the result you are expecting, warning: check your network connections and make sure your internet warning: firewall software is disabled. FirewallD is enabled, network is on. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Setting wireless network printer issue
Hello, I recently installed F18 TC4 and notice that printer setting from Control Setting failed to recognize wireless printer even with entered ip address. Previous release F17 has no such issue. Is there a workaround or solution? Thanks, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: php failed to run
On Tue 04 Dec 2012 09:17:03 PM PST, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 19:20 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: [Mon Dec 03 17:16:52.319181 2012] [autoindex:error] [pid 5233] [client 127.0.0.1:38664] AH01276: Cannot serve directory /var/www/html/: No matching DirectoryIndex (index.html,index.php) found, and server-generated directory index forbidden by Options directive I'm guessing that's the problem? IIRunning index.php inside /var/www./html works fine, still does not resolve ~/public_html I am investigating. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: php failed to run
On Tue 04 Dec 2012 11:45:39 AM PST, Adam Williamson wrote: What error message do you get? Did you check if it's SELinux? (Easy way to check - 'setenforce Permissive', try again, see if it works. If it does, the correct conclusion is not 'oh well, I'll just run in permissive mode forever' but 'ah, I need to fix up the SELinux contexts'.) One of errors was apparently related to SELinux which I sent a report : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883200 After creating a policy, testing a simple phpinfo() from a local server still display blank. Setting selinux to permissive has no effect on php behaviour, I always leave Enforcing on by default. All setting are done from /etc/httpd/conf.d/ with only edited userdir. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
php failed to run
Hello all, After installing both httpd and php and setting a UserDir to enable public_html, I encountered an issue with php which failed to run despite its presence. Here is the conf userdir.conf # # Control access to UserDir directories. The following is an example # for a site where these directories are restricted to read-only. # AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Indexes Options MultiViews Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch IncludesNoExec Require method GET POST OPTIONS php.conf # # Cause the PHP interpreter to handle files with a .php extension. # SetHandler application/x-httpd-php # # Add index.php to the list of files that will be served as directory # indexes. # DirectoryIndex index.php # # Uncomment the following lines to allow PHP to pretty-print .phps # files as PHP source code: # # #SetHandler application/x-httpd-php-source # # # Apache specific PHP configuration options # those can be override in each configured vhost # php_value session.save_handler "files" php_value session.save_path"/var/lib/php/session" -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Network issue on F15 RC3
Following reported bug[1], I installed F15 RC3 from Live Media on my laptop. Wireless connection is still an issue on post-installation. However, wired connect issue seemed resolved meaning I will install FC5 RC3 on my desktop. I posted messages files for comparison and will submit wireshark file shortly. Something happened during the installation that cause wireless issue because Live Media version did not have that problem. [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691663 Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: gimp-2.7.2...
Quoting Rob Healey : > Dear Richard: > > I am willing to install and do some testing if you are willing to share the > newly updated source rpm? Sure. Source rpm is located at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3063546 Sincerely, Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Assistace to build gimp-2.7.2
Quoting Richard Shaw : > The packages successfully built with the above changes but I have not > installed them for testing. > > Richard > -- I implement the changes you suggested. Built was successful and Gimp 2.7.2 is running fine. Thank you for your help. Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Assistace to build gimp-2.7.2
Can anyone check the spec file of gimp? I intend to package Gimp 2.7.2 from my fedorapeople repo which is used by some fedora based distributions. For some reason, it will not properly build with koji. http://thefinalzone.net/devel/gimp-2.7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Thanks in advance, Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Busted networking on F15
Same issue from both upgrade and netinstall from scratch. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691663 Luya > -- Original Message -- > From: Orion Poplawski > Date: Sat, Apr 2, 2011 / 3:49am GMT > > I seem to have ended up with busted networking on my F15 machine after > updating to latest development/15 (no updates-testing). dig and host > can resolve IPs, but nothing else seems to be able to . Anyone else > seen this?-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Update from 20110424 caused bad udp cksum
I upgrade my desktop (Acer ASE380) from Fedora 14 to F15. Unfortunately, the network has issue with "bad udp cksum" using tcpdump. -vv command. How to resolve that problem?NetworkManager caused a lot of trouble since I moved to F15 on Toshiba Satelitte C650D (Fusion version).Thanks for help.Luya-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Beta RC2 Available Now!
Quoting Andre Robatino : > As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC2 is now available > for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and > testing instructions. Installed Fedora 15 Beta RC2 x86_64 from netinstall, NetworkManager keeps screwing up DHCP from both wired and wireless connection on post installation. Worse, using ifup em2 will not get online access. That behaviour did not happen on Alpha version and i686 Fedora 15 Beta based Gnome 3 Live . Details is available on bug #691663 [*] including the Reatket wireless hardware. Adam did his best to figure out the issue but that strange problem left more puzzles than solution. I don't know if other people have similar issue. Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: NetworkManager 0.8.997-6 will not connect to network
Quoting Michael Knepher : > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Running updated Fedora 15 on Toshiba Satellite C650 D powered by AMD 350, > > NetworkManager will not be able to connect to either wired or wireless > > network. I submitted report for investigation: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691663 > > This may go without saying, but did you restart your system after the > update? I had a similar issue last night when I updated. I logged out > and back in, and nothing was working, but after a full restart, wifi > was working properly. > > Michael > I did. Same result. =( Luya -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
NetworkManager 0.8.997-6 will not connect to network
Running updated Fedora 15 on Toshiba Satellite C650 D powered by AMD 350, NetworkManager will not be able to connect to either wired or wireless network. I submitted report for investigation:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691663Luya-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/11 09:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > As noted on the Wiki page, uninstall ibus-* and at-spi2-atk (or you can > just downgrade that one to .5 and it should work). Thanks Adam. Test completed on my laptop (LG LT20) - -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNTz/YAAoJEGZ+gIukWeEemOQH/2HMIJmPLjBFCNzIZQT/Fphq hWFR0Ts5tUD3Atv+zqkKOjaxu3RwXUQxkCDsDj38Bp3/eNjD6yb8Plz5x7P0QcGL jg4VUDPr3XbiISxTgeWQcyYC9stcFjcM1D+K/l+AW72ndclhf30NcuZ8IleMGtds OPrxP773cbZBk24NpCDW9boqE6W6kFwDJDepyvqYU/sDhI6BfpNemKuTFzI9nRSk vX6c7/2dDTfuZycuTv+gd0KUgAj7q1lA8Oj44os1pesm/jiTTnlvQ32us0dnFTXs jasZriqBBRILeOBML18YVDZEMBYq14vurLYnOdPCddqBxQZj/t4omt6NWgFeSV0= =7r1E -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day
After updating Rawhide, I notice Gnome 3 (mutter) constantly crash when pressing Alt+Tab or entering an input on search on computer field. Affected applications are GTK based. Does anyone have similar problem? -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
