Re: Koji downtime?
Koji is up, but f25 tags are not ready yet. Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Wordpress and security updates
Hi, Various upstream updates have been published recently (since March 23th) to fix at least 3 critical security issues. My first idea was to keep 4.1.2 to get a fast fix, and then push 4.2 and have a more longer testing phase... But 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.1.5, 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.2.2... in a few days. So all branches now have 4.2.2 in testing. Some builds got karma, but because of new builds and push to stable delay, we still need more. So all branches still have old unsecure 4.1.1, for 2 weeks. Please test and give Karma so we can have a secure version in stable repo. Thanks, Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Does anyone reuse /boot or /var partitions ?
Le 22/01/2015 22:36, Adam Williamson a écrit : There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an existing partition with those mountpoints. I reuse tons of sub-directory of /var /var/lib/mysql /var/lib/libvirt/images /var/cache/mock /var/lib/mock Ok, I don't really need them on install (I usually re-enable them after install) I'm curious to know if anyone / many people do this, and if so, if there's a particularly good use case for it; if so, we might want to provide that feedback to the anaconda folks. There are a few references to using shared /boot on Google, but not that many, and mostly for crazy multiboot configurations that we really don't want to be stuck dealing with. Does anyone know of a really sensible use case for this? Yes, I use shared /boot for multi-boot (multiple fedora version). I don't think disallowint mounting an existing partition without reformatting it is a good idea. Remi. For the record, this is actually re-hooking up code that was used in oldUI - that is, F17 and earlier - but in oldUI it just produced a warning you had to click through; the current patch flat disallows it. The main driving force for this is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1074358 , as it keeps turning out to be annoyingly tricky to make sure that only newly- installed kernels have their initramfs regenerated when installing to a shared /boot partition. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
php-fpm and IPv6 support - call for tests
Hi, I just push PHP 5.6.3-4 in f21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15053 This minor release introduce quite an important feature: php-fpm is now aware of Ipv6. In upstream release this feature is mostly broken, but our build include various upstream patches (all up to now) Default configuration listen to 127.0.0.1:9000, so is not directly affected by this change. listen = 9000 (all IPv4) should be (also) unchanged Now you can also use listen = [IPv6 address]:port listen = [::]:port (all addresses, IPv6 + IPv4-Mapped) listen.allowed_clients also accepts both IPv4 IPv6 addr. Test / feedback for this feature is very welcome Thanks Remi. P.S.1 this feature is also part of 5.5.19, our build also includes most of the upstream patches, but I'm thinking to revert this IPv6 feature or to add the other upstream patches, so tests really needed. P.S.2 from RPM changelog - FPM: add upstream patch for https://bugs.php.net/68428 listen.allowed_clients is IPv4 only - FPM: add upstream patch for https://bugs.php.net/68421 access.format=R doesn't log ipv6 address - FPM: add upstream patch for https://bugs.php.net/68420 listen=9000 listens to ipv6 localhost instead of all addresses - FPM: add upstream patch for https://bugs.php.net/68423 will no longer load all pools - sync php-fpm configuration with upstream -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
PHP SIG (revival) probably more a webapp or LAMP SIG.
Hi, People interested in the PHP stack, or more generally the web applications stuff, should probably join the php-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list. For example the is some change proposal under discussion there - php 5.6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/php-devel/2014-March/000240.html - httpd-filesystem proposal https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/php-devel/2014-March/000241.html - numeric prefix for php configuration files: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/php-devel/2014-April/000242.html - apache configuration change for php-fpm https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/php-devel/2014-April/000243.html Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker - Please add symfony packages.
Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit : Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting, and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go meeting Please consider for F20Final: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22356 Having a broken PHPUnit in F20 will make most of the PHP packages FTBFS. Note: retiring a package before the new one is pushed is just a VERY bad idea (despite comment#34 on bz) Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 04/07/2013 17:09, Ankur Sinha a écrit : On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 14:51 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: How does a reporter supposed to know which bugs are fixed if there is no update description? One can specify what bugs an update fixes in Bodhi. These bugs are closed when the update goes stable, and these bugs are listed both in bodhi and in fedora-easy-karma. All the updates I've seen today that received negative karma for their descriptions had these bugs specified. I think an update with some bug link(s) really have a description. And I also think that an update without description (really no description, or only a short silly message) could receive negative karma. But probably because I always try to give as much as possible information in my updates. Remi. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHVlOUACgkQYUppBSnxahgYWgCdGgrzupwG/pVI2rPHNLKrzLmw iRAAnRzEbQfKGfjOauV3f37vL/IOhqm6 =jxqw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: yum question Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Le 15/06/2013 10:43, Joachim Backes a écrit : Hi all, can anybody explain the meaning of d in the yum prompt Is this ok [y/d/N]:? Googling this, I found this question too, but no answer. download Kind regards Joachim Backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: yum question Is this ok [y/d/N]:
Le 15/06/2013 10:52, Someone Somewhere a écrit : I think it should stand for yes/default/no. Default action may be different depending on the scrnario. Eg while installing it may be yes but qhile erasing it may be a no. Can someone confirm if my interpretation is correct? Default action is the one in uppercase Remi. -Kunal On Jun 15, 2013 2:17 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com mailto:fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 15/06/2013 10:43, Joachim Backes a écrit : Hi all, can anybody explain the meaning of d in the yum prompt Is this ok [y/d/N]:? Googling this, I found this question too, but no answer. download Kind regards Joachim Backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: thunderbird 14 from rawhide won't install because thunderbird-enigmail needs tbird 14
Le 20/07/2012 17:59, Kevin Martin a écrit : I didn't see a thunderbird-enigmail package in koji...is anybody working on getting a thunderbird-enigmail package for tbird 14? Enigmail 1.4.3 for Thunderbird 14.0 is now available in rpmfusion updates. Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: thunderbird 14 from rawhide won't install because thunderbird-enigmail needs tbird 14
Le 21/07/2012 04:17, Andre Robatino a écrit : Kevin Martin ktmdms at gmail.com writes: I didn't see a thunderbird-enigmail package in koji...is anybody working on getting a thunderbird-enigmail package for tbird 14? Thunderbird-enigmail is from rpmfusion-free. The same problem exists in F17. Normally a new package appears in rpmfusion-free-updates-testing fairly quickly, but not this time. I'm currently AFK, so haven't be able to push enigmail update to rpmfusion. FYI: enigmail is currently waiting for a reviewer to move to fedora repository, the only good solution to have update push in the right time... Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Authentification forwarding with ssh on f15
I have a strange issue with Authentification forwarding. It works for me for years... (and I've just test it on my old fedora 14) And stop working in fedora 15 (beta, full updates) Using the same account name on all hosts: $ ssh serveur1 hostname ok $ ssh serveur2 hostname ok $ ssh -A serveur1 ssh serveur2 hostname Permission denied, please try again. Permission denied, please try again. Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password). Any idea where to search ? Remi P.S. serveur1 runs RHEL5.6, serveur2, various OS (debian, CentOS, ...) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Authentification forwarding with ssh on f15
Le 04/05/2011 17:39, James Laska a écrit : doesn't like the permissions of a file in $HOME/.ssh/ or something else? Permissions seems ok as direct ssh works... (.ssh is 700, id_dsa is 600) Maybe add a few verbose options (-v) to the ssh command. See what if it Here is (one with -v on first server, one with -v on second server) --- $ ssh -A box ssh -v lind hostname OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Applying options for lind debug1: Connecting to lind [195.83.130.94] port 110. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: loaded 3 keys debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.3 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.3 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.3 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server-client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client-server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(102410248192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'lind' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/remi/.ssh/known_hosts:2 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information Unknown code krb5 195 debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information Unknown code krb5 195 debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information Unknown code krb5 195 debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/remi/.ssh/identity debug1: Trying private key: /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Next authentication method: password debug1: read_passphrase: can't open /dev/tty: No such device or address debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password Permission denied, please try again. debug1: read_passphrase: can't open /dev/tty: No such device or address debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password Permission denied, please try again. debug1: read_passphrase: can't open /dev/tty: No such device or address debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password). --- $ ssh -A -v box ssh lind hostname OpenSSH_5.6p1, OpenSSL 1.0.0d-fips 8 Feb 2011 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to box [88.191.74.232] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.3 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.3 pat OpenSSH_4* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server-client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client-server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(102410248192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'box' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/remi/.ssh/known_hosts:7 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: Roaming not allowed by server debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information Credentials cache file '/tmp/krb5cc_500' not found debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information Credentials cache file '/tmp/krb5cc_500' not found debug1: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more
Re: Authentification forwarding with ssh on f15 [solved]
Forward don't work for my old id_dsa private key. Diffing verbose output from f14 and f15 --- fedora14.log 2011-05-04 18:28:10.0 +0200 +++ fedora15.log 2011-05-04 18:30:44.0 +0200 @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ -OpenSSH_5.5p1, OpenSSL 1.0.0d-fips 8 Feb 2011 +OpenSSH_5.6p1, OpenSSL 1.0.0d-fips 8 Feb 2011 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to box [88.191.74.232] port 22. debug1: Connection established. -debug1: identity file /home/remif9/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 -debug1: identity file /home/remif9/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 -debug1: identity file /home/remif9/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 = !! -debug1: identity file /home/remif9/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 +debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 +debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 +debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 == !! +debug1: identity file /home/remi/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.3 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.3 pat OpenSSH_4* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 -debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.5 +debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server-client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none Don't know if this is a bug Bug switching to a new id_rsa private key solves the issue. Remi. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: certain php-pear and php-channel-doctrine installs or updates run php forever
Le 08/10/2010 16:40, stan a écrit : Hi, I installed F14 x86_64 from the Beta DVD this week. When I updated the huge number of packages I normally install, I found that whenever certain php-pear packages or the php-channel-doctrine package are installed or updated, yum fires off php and it runs using over 90% of CPU, and seemingly doing nothing. I let it run for a while to see if it was doing something useful, and it ran for over 40 minutes without ending, using most of the cpu during that time. When I cancel the transaction, yum in the future informs me that there is a transaction awaiting completion and I should run yum-complete-transaction. When I do the same behavior ensues. Could you provides the installed php extension list ? rpm -qa php\* | sort 1/ yum update --exclude php\* (to avoid long list in next) 2/ yum update And a full yum transaction output + I assume this is an error, and so I wonder where to file it. Is this an error in yum? In php? In the configuration of the package being installed? What should the bugzilla be opened against? I would rather not open a bugzilla for each component that does this, so how would I generalize it? Thanks. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: certain php-pear and php-channel-doctrine installs or updates run php forever
Le 08/10/2010 21:18, stan a écrit : PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib64/php/modules/gv.so' - /usr/lib64/php/modules/gv.so: undefined symbol: zend_error_noreturn in Unknown on line 0 At least this should be reported against graphviz (graphviz-php) You should also try to disable as much as possible extension (put in comment the extension directive in /etc/php.d/*.ini) to find the guilty one. + (process:9630): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2710: You forgot to call g_type_init() (process:9630): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (process:9630): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed error: %post(php-pear-CAS-1.1.3-1.fc14.noarch) scriptlet failed, signal 2 PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ PPID COMMAND 9630 root 20 0 736m 31m 23m R 93.0 1.6 1:13.51 9627 php 30234 root 20 0 15296 1300 836 R 2.5 0.1 3:21.17 5631 top PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ PPID COMMAND 9630 root 20 0 736m 31m 23m R 91.8 1.6 2:25.79 9627 php 30234 root 20 0 15296 1300 836 R 2.5 0.1 3:22.84 5631 top -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
