Re: Development repos accumulating prior daily builds [FIXED]
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:16 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via > test wrote: > > > > Kevin, > > > > Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the > > scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed? > > The scripts are updated now, but rawhide compose failed today > (due to xorg-x11-server-utils being retired and lorax still trying to > install it). > > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/issues/1117 > > as soon as that gets fixed and we get a compose the old duplicates > should go away. Kevin, My local rsync just finished up. It's a couple hundred gigs lighter. :- ) Thanks. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Development repos accumulating prior daily builds
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:16 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:53:34PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via > test wrote: > > > > Kevin, > > > > Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the > > scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed? > > The scripts are updated now, but rawhide compose failed today > (due to xorg-x11-server-utils being retired and lorax still trying to > install it). > > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/issues/1117 > > as soon as that gets fixed and we get a compose the old duplicates > should go away. Kevin, Thanks for the update. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Development repos accumulating prior daily builds
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:50 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 08:53:10PM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via > test wrote: > > Not sure if anyone here can address this minor problem, but here > > goes. > > For more than a week The top-level Fedora development repository at > > //dl.fedoraproject.org/fedora-linux-development/34 and /rawhide > > haven't > > been deleting the previous datetime versions of isos and other > > large > > files. Example: > > > > $ cd .../rawhide/Spins/x86_64/iso/ > > $ ls -al > ...snip... > > > > That's consuming a lot of unnecessary filespace. > > Good eye. :) > > It's a bug that was introduced in a recent change in the scripts that > sync rawhide and branched. ;( > > I just made some PR's to fix it: > > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1014 > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1015 > > as soon as those get reviewed this should get fixed. > > Thanks for noting it! Kevin, Thanks for submitting those PRs. Do you have a sense of when the scripts will actually be updated and the older files flushed? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Development repos accumulating prior daily builds
Not sure if anyone here can address this minor problem, but here goes. For more than a week The top-level Fedora development repository at //dl.fedoraproject.org/fedora-linux-development/34 and /rawhide haven't been deleting the previous datetime versions of isos and other large files. Example: $ cd .../rawhide/Spins/x86_64/iso/ $ ls -al total 67072371 -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2164260864 Feb 23 18:31 Fedora-Cinnamon- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2164260864 Feb 25 02:47 Fedora-Cinnamon- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2164260864 Feb 26 02:32 Fedora-Cinnamon- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2162147328 Feb 27 02:35 Fedora-Cinnamon- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2164260864 Feb 28 02:26 Fedora-Cinnamon- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2118221824 Feb 22 02:01 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210222.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2126544896 Feb 23 18:47 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2126544896 Feb 25 02:47 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2126544896 Feb 26 02:37 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2126544896 Feb 27 02:35 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2126544896 Feb 28 02:36 Fedora-KDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1366327296 Feb 22 01:59 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210222.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1377550336 Feb 23 18:33 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1377550336 Feb 25 02:30 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1376190464 Feb 26 02:36 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1375731712 Feb 27 02:34 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1377550336 Feb 28 02:22 Fedora-LXDE-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1455341568 Feb 23 18:42 Fedora-LXQt-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1455341568 Feb 25 02:33 Fedora-LXQt-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1453916160 Feb 26 02:34 Fedora-LXQt-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1453916160 Feb 27 02:33 Fedora-LXQt-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1453916160 Feb 28 02:32 Fedora-LXQt-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2172518400 Feb 23 18:47 Fedora-MATE_Compiz- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2172518400 Feb 25 02:39 Fedora-MATE_Compiz- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2172518400 Feb 26 02:32 Fedora-MATE_Compiz- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2172518400 Feb 27 02:41 Fedora-MATE_Compiz- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 2172518400 Feb 28 02:26 Fedora-MATE_Compiz- Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1093238784 Feb 22 01:57 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210222.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1099726848 Feb 23 18:29 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1099726848 Feb 25 02:28 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1098645504 Feb 26 02:29 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1098645504 Feb 27 02:22 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1098645504 Feb 28 02:27 Fedora-SoaS-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 774 Feb 22 03:48 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210222.n.0-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1378 Feb 23 23:17 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210223.n.1-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1378 Feb 25 07:01 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210225.n.0-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1378 Feb 26 07:11 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210226.n.0-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1568 Feb 27 06:08 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210227.n.0-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1568 Mar 2 11:10 Fedora-Spins-Rawhide- x86_64-20210228.n.0-CHECKSUM -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1666252800 Feb 22 02:00 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210222.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1672806400 Feb 23 18:37 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210223.n.1.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1672806400 Feb 25 02:32 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210225.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1672806400 Feb 26 02:35 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210226.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1671168000 Feb 27 02:26 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210227.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 1671168000 Feb 28 02:34 Fedora-Xfce-Live- x86_64-Rawhide-20210228.n.0.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 nobody nobody 10622074
Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B
Sam, Thanks for your response. Note, however, that this info is "as of" almost a year ago. Has any progress been made since then? The only remotely possible way I know of to install Fedora on a P4B is to follow the complex instructions at https://medium.com/ironhaul/installing-64-bit-fedora-on-the-raspberry-pi-4-d4a665ea65d3. Unfortunately it requires a very heavy prerequisite: learning Ansible. --Doc SavageFairview Heights, IL On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 00:00 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/8/20 10:05 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via test wrote: > > This is a fairly harsh response. If you really meant to say > > "Never", please elaborate. What is the issue? The P4B is an > > important product, potentially one that will establish ARM as a > > valid desktop and small server option. For Fedora to support P3B+ > > and then reject its successor without explanation is curious. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi#Raspberry_Pi_4 > ___test mailing list -- > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B
This is a fairly harsh response. If you really meant to say "Never", please elaborate. What is the issue? The P4B is an important product, potentially one that will establish ARM as a valid desktop and small server option. For Fedora to support P3B+ and then reject its successor without explanation is curious. --Doc SavageFairview Heights, IL On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 07:08 -0500, Klein Kravis wrote: > For the foreseeable future Fedora wi not run on Raspberry Pi 4. > Please try a 3B+ > > > On Sep 30, 2020, 7:07 AM -0500, Ashish Kumar > , wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to boot Fedora IoT aarch64 images on my Raspberry Pi 4B > > but failing to do so as I see an error that EFI was unable to load > > the image. I have tried using the raw images of the current 32 IoT > > and 33 Pre-release IoT. Please tell me where I am going wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > ___test mailing list -- > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Exciting news
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 22:23 -0500, David wrote: > I am not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I resolved my Rawhide > update problem > all on my own. > > The trick was to first run "dnf install redhat-rpm-config" > > I think that is all there was too it. > > I installed a lot of packages manually, but I do not think that was > necessary. > > My Rawhide install now has about seventy fc33 packages. And > lots of the > anaconda packages seemed to clear out. > > Everything installed !! > > I am too scared to reboot.But probably will anyways. > > I am curious now whether my system will say I am on Fedora 33, if > it reboots successfully ?? > > David Locklear > Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.2 > Arcola, Texas USA > David, If you want a simple way to see exactly what kernel you're running, type: uname -a If you want to know the familiar name of the OS you are running, type: cat /etc/fedora-release If you REALLY want to get fancy, edit your /etc/bashrc file using vim or equivalent editor. Look for the following three lines about 52 lines into the file: # Turn on checkwinsizeshopt -s checkwinsize[ "$PS1" = "\\s- \\v\\\$ " ] && PS1="[\u@\h \W]\\$ " Replace the third line with this: [ "$PS1" = "\\s-\\v\\\$ " ] && PS1="\n\\033[1;31m`cat /etc/redhat- release`\n\\033[1;34m`date +%A` - `date +%B` `date +%d`, `date +%Y` \\033[0;32m\t `date +%Z`\n\033[0;36m[\u@\h:\l] \\033[1;33m\w\\033[0;37m\n\\$ " (Make sure you use back ticks rather than single quotes.) This will give you a complex colorful multi-line xterm prompt that will dress up your terminal sessions. If you like running Rawhide simply because it has a cool name, you should probably have heeded your mother's warning not to run with scissors. I've been using Fedora since its initial release, and Red Hat Linux before that. I remember the wreckage in the early days when I (ignorantly) tried installing every (!) package in what was then Rawhide. Talk about your major train wreck. I eventually learned to install development versions of Fedora (starting with the Beta release) only in a VM so any serious oops wouldn't destroy my day-to-day working files in /home. It's up to you, of course. Just a bit of no-cost advise from a long- time user to a new guy. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
