Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  closed  
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:  fixed|Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Changes (by rhe):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

Comment:

 Btrfs and xfs tests have been added to the install matrix.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 Add the following btrfs and xfs partitioning tests to
 
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_16_Install_Results_Template#General_Tests
 install test template]:
  -
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_btrfs_rootfs_on_disk_partition
  -
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_xfs_rootfs_on_disk_partition

 These tests are set to the ‘Final’ priority according to the final release
 criteria:

 "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable
 partition layout using any file system offered in a default installer
 configuration, LVM, software, hardware or BIOS RAID, or combination of the
 above"

 If any other partitioning tests need be added to the template, feel free
 to discuss.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 Replying to [comment:13 jdulaney]:
 > I've sent off some emails to see what is going on in that regard with
 btrfs (and Grub2, necessary for booting it).
 >
 > If it is accepted (and I don't see how it would be without functional
 Grub2) as standard and Grub2 is not finished, then would Anaconda be able
 to do an Ext4 /boot partition automagically?

 I know your concerning, but Looking up the
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F16BtrfsDefaultFs
 F16BtrfsDefaultFs page], it still shows that the percentage of completion
 is 0%. The latest rawhide isos are uploaded at:
 http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20110721-3/, and the
 default partitioning is still lvm. So I guess this feature will be
 finished on next version? Correct me if you got any surprise.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jdulaney):

 I've sent off some emails to see what is going on in that regard with
 btrfs (and Grub2, necessary for booting it).

 If it is accepted (and I don't see how it would be without functional
 Grub2) as standard and Grub2 is not finished, then would Anaconda be able
 to do an Ext4 /boot partition automagically?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 I updated the btrfs case as it's not yet set as default on Fedora 16:

  *
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_btrfs_rootfs_on_disk_partition

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jdulaney):

 > Are these tests you'd envision someone running whenever btrfs-related
 packages are updated in bodhi?  If so, in accordance with
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation
 QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation], perhaps it would make sense to use
 Category:Package_btrfs-progs_test_cases instead?
 >
 >

 Indeed, I reckon I should do it that way.  I'll fix it right fast.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jlaska):

 Replying to [comment:9 jdulaney]:
 > I've also moved the test cases out of my user space, and catagorized
 them all together (2), including the Anaconda case.
 > (2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Btrfs_test_cases

 Are these tests you'd envision someone running whenever btrfs-related
 packages are updated in bodhi?  If so, in accordance with
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation
 QA:SOP_package_test_plan_creation], perhaps it would make sense to use
 Category:Package_btrfs-progs_test_cases instead?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jdulaney):

 I've added a generic subvolume creation test (1).  Next up is figuring out
 if Anaconda is going to support subvolume creation during install.  If so,
 I'll creat a test case for that, as well.

 I've also moved the test cases out of my user space, and catagorized them
 all together (2), including the Anaconda case.

 (1) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs_Subvolume_Creation
 (2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Btrfs_test_cases

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 Created another xfs test:

  *
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_xfs_rootfs_on_disk_partition

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Changes (by rhe):

 * cc: jo...@redhat.com (added)

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:6 jdulaney]:
 > Replying to [comment:5 rhe]:
 > > Hi jdulaney,
 > >
 > > I remembered you created a btrfs test for installer:
 > >
 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs
 > >
 > > Do you have any plan to update it? To make it mimic the non-lvm
 primary partitions(e.g.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_ext4_rootfs_on_disk_partition)
 or similar to the default partitioning install test(e.g.
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install) ?
 > >
 >
 > Actually, I have that written up in my notebook; just have to transfer
 it online.  I plan to do so tomorrow.  Today has been recover-from-
 yesterday-day.
 >
 > I figure I'll get the Anaconda installation stuff done with, and I think
 that should cover a lot of the basic usage.  Then I'll get into things
 such as subvolume creation/use, the LVM replacement stuff, etc.

 Thanks, I created a new anaconda btrfs test based on your test case:
  *
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_btrfs_rootfs_on_disk_partition

 where I assumed that only / was formatted as btrfs by anaconda defaults,
 but it surely need be confirmed by the developers. Adding Josef to the cc
 list. Josef, can you please clarify what's the default filesystem for
 /boot on Fedora 16? Also are there any other changes on anaconda when
 making btrfs as the default comparing with previous lvm defaults? Thanks.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jdulaney):

 Replying to [comment:5 rhe]:
 > Hi jdulaney,
 >
 > I remembered you created a btrfs test for installer:
 >
 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs
 >
 > Do you have any plan to update it? To make it mimic the non-lvm primary
 partitions(e.g.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_ext4_rootfs_on_disk_partition)
 or similar to the default partitioning install test(e.g.
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install) ?
 >

 Actually, I have that written up in my notebook; just have to transfer it
 online.  I plan to do so tomorrow.  Today has been recover-from-yesterday-
 day.

 I figure I'll get the Anaconda installation stuff done with, and I think
 that should cover a lot of the basic usage.  Then I'll get into things
 such as subvolume creation/use, the LVM replacement stuff, etc.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 Hi jdulaney,

 I remembered you created a btrfs test for installer:

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs

 Do you have any plan to update it? To make it mimic the non-lvm primary
 partitions(e.g.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_ext4_rootfs_on_disk_partition)
 or similar to the default partitioning install test(e.g.
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install) ?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jdulaney):

 James;
 I'd sort of been following that line of thought and using the EXT4 test
 cases as templates.  I reckon I need to get back on this; I've been
 slacking.

 Here's a couple of test cases:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jdulaney/Draft_Testcase_btrfs_migration
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jdulaney/Draft_Testcase_Mount_btrfs

 As I create more draft test cases, I'll link to them here as well as the
 mailing list.

 I figure that the basic functionality ought to have priority; the
 replacement for logical volumes and other functionality is secondary to
 that.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by jlaska):

 When drafting this recommendation, the original intent was something to
 mimic the existing installer tests that create non-lvm primary partitions
 (e.g.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcases_anaconda_ext4_rootfs_on_disk_partition).
 We may also want additional tests to more fully explore btrfs
 functionality.  Let's get those into a different request if desired.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by athmane):

 Replying to [comment:1 adamwill]:
 > I believe someone mentioned on the list they were working on btrfs test
 cases, it may have been Athmane.

 No, it was John Dulaney

 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-June/100749.html

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new 
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 16   
 Component:  Wiki | Version:  
Resolution:   |Keywords:  15 retrospective
--+-
Comment (by adamwill):

 I believe someone mentioned on the list they were working on btrfs test
 cases, it may have been Athmane.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's

[Fedora QA]

#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
 Reporter:  rhe   |   Owner:  rhe  
 Type:  enhancement   |  Status:  new  
 Priority:  major |   Milestone:  Fedora 16
Component:  Wiki  | Version:   
 Keywords:  15 retrospective  |  
--+-
 There are no tests to cover partitioning using non-ext file systems, such
 as btrfs/xfs etc. Tests need be added to cover these. Assign to me for
 now, feel free to retake it.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test