Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
--+-
  Reporter:  ausil|   Owner:  adamw 
  Type:  defect   |  Status:  closed
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:
 Component:  Test Review  | Version:
Resolution:  duplicate|Keywords:
--+-
Changes (by adamwill):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => duplicate

Comment:

 I think we can probably subsume this into the ticket for expanding testing
 of USB boot:

 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/260

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
--+-
  Reporter:  ausil|   Owner:  adamw
  Type:  defect   |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:   
 Component:  Test Review  | Version:   
Resolution:   |Keywords:   
--+-
Changes (by jlaska):

  * component:  Trac => Test Review

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
  Reporter:  ausil   |   Owner:  adamw
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:   
 Component:  Trac| Version:   
Resolution:  |Keywords:   
-+--
Comment (by ausil):

 it should be alpha, its a supported method of installing. it should always
 work.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
  Reporter:  ausil   |   Owner:  adamw
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:   
 Component:  Trac| Version:   
Resolution:  |Keywords:   
-+--
Changes (by robatino):

 * cc: robatino (added)

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
-+--
  Reporter:  ausil   |   Owner:  adamw
  Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major   |   Milestone:   
 Component:  Trac| Version:   
Resolution:  |Keywords:   
-+--
Comment (by adamwill):

 Sure, sounds good. Do you think there should be a release criterion for
 this - i.e. should it be required to be working? for Alpha, Beta,
 Final...?

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised

[Fedora QA]

#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
+---
 Reporter:  ausil   |   Owner:  adamw
 Type:  defect  |  Status:  new  
 Priority:  major   |   Milestone:   
Component:  Trac| Version:   
 Keywords:  |  
+---
 = bug description =
 F-16 alpha shipped witha  boot.iso that did not have isohybrid run on it,
 this means you can not just dd it to a usb drive and boot it.

 = bug analysis =
 slipped though as there was no test case

 = fix recommendation =

 lorax has been fixed, but we should make sure we cover it in testing.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test