Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:26, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:39 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: I don't see how it can be a go if Live doesn't work without enforcing=0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 I'm surprised RC3 was rushed so quickly with no resoution to this. I expect an RC4 will be necessary. We're working on that. The reason RC3 was spun was because we thought it was solved with an selinux-policy update that was included in RC3. This is all documented in the bug. True, it is documented in the bug - but not as you state here. The latest selinux-policy was in RC2 already and I had it tested within ~2h after the announcement. The result was clearly, that the issue at hand was not yet fixed (see comment #10). There have been no changes on this front before RC3 was released, so no chance of having it fixed. Just trying to correct the impression here, but I'm sure there's been reasons for RC3 on another front (libreport or so). Actually, I think RCs were spun too early and more TCs had been necessary - but that's mostly a naming thing so never mind. -- red -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:00 +0200, Sandro red Mathys wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:26, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:39 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: I don't see how it can be a go if Live doesn't work without enforcing=0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 I'm surprised RC3 was rushed so quickly with no resoution to this. I expect an RC4 will be necessary. We're working on that. The reason RC3 was spun was because we thought it was solved with an selinux-policy update that was included in RC3. This is all documented in the bug. True, it is documented in the bug - but not as you state here. The latest selinux-policy was in RC2 already and I had it tested within ~2h after the announcement. The result was clearly, that the issue at hand was not yet fixed (see comment #10). There have been no changes on this front before RC3 was released, so no chance of having it fixed. Just trying to correct the impression here, but I'm sure there's been reasons for RC3 on another front (libreport or so). Actually, I think RCs were spun too early and more TCs had been necessary - but that's mostly a naming thing so never mind. RC3 was done quickly to correct a single obvious mistake in RC2 - an update RC2 should have included was left out - so we didn't really do a full survey of other bugs to check if there were more issues. RC3 is really just 'what RC2 was meant to be'. There's a clear distinction between TCs and RCs. RCs happen post-freeze and can only be RCs if all confirmed blockers are addressed when they're produced (when we've decided to spin an image post-freeze, during 'RC time', but with known blockers remaining, we've called it a TC). This was the case for RC2 (and RC1); it just turns out the apparent fix for one blocker did not actually fix it. As described above we didn't technically follow the strict letter of this policy for RC3, but there's a reason for that (also see above). =) We have no precedent for going backwards from RCs to TCs, either, so really the other choice would have been not to spin an RC3 to fix the obvious bug in RC2 at all, which doesn't seem like a better plan. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: skip Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please add the url to the above run page so that others can test? Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On 08/10/2011 11:16 AM, He Rui wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: skip Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please add the url to the above run page so that others can test? Yes, currently Security Lab SPIN ISO are not yet available at RC3 stage (the same is for other no-desktop SPIN and LXDE spin) [1] I'll run Security Spin testing as soon as the iso will be available. [1] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Alpha.RC3/Live/x86_64/ Thanks. -- Athmane Madjoudj -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:25 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: On 08/10/2011 11:16 AM, He Rui wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: skip Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please add the url to the above run page so that others can test? Yes, currently Security Lab SPIN ISO are not yet available at RC3 stage (the same is for other no-desktop SPIN and LXDE spin) [1] I'll run Security Spin testing as soon as the iso will be available. [1] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Alpha.RC3/Live/x86_64/ Spins beyond desktop, KDE, XFCE, LXDE don't usually get built at this stage; what you can do is nominate a nightly build to serve as the RC, but that may not work great at the moment since fixes being pushed into the RC don't seem to be making it to public mirrors (I think there hasn't been a tree compose). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same as that for install images, except with the trailing /Fedora/ replaced by /Live/. The only difference between RC2 and RC3 is that RC3 includes the libreport update which fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692433 - reporting anaconda failures. Given the tight time before go/no-go tomorrow, I suggest we combine RC2 and RC3 test results: for RC3, please focus on testing things that haven't yet been filled in in the RC2 matrices, so between RC2 and RC3 we have all Alpha tests covered. And, of course, re-do the tests which hit 692433 in RC2 - most importantly, QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla . Thanks everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:05:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote: As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same as that for install images, except with the trailing /Fedora/ replaced by /Live/. The only difference between RC2 and RC3 is that RC3 includes the libreport update which fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692433 - reporting anaconda failures. Given the tight time before go/no-go tomorrow, I suggest we combine RC2 and RC3 test results: for RC3, please focus on testing things that haven't yet been filled in in the RC2 matrices, so between RC2 and RC3 we have all Alpha tests covered. And, of course, re-do the tests which hit 692433 in RC2 - most importantly, QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla . Thanks everyone! I don't see how it can be a go if Live doesn't work without enforcing=0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 I'm surprised RC3 was rushed so quickly with no resoution to this. I expect an RC4 will be necessary. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
