Re: [Test-Announce] Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 20:32 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Downloading the Live media 64 bit now ... will try an install once > it's pushed to a USB stick. I can also run anything in a VMware 9, > VirtualBox 4.2.6, F18 Virtual Machine Manager or Windows 8 Pro Client > Hyper-V guest. Is Windows 8 Pro Client Hyper-V hosting supported? I don't know about 'supported', but other people have reported Hyper-V works, so give it a shot. I don't think we'd lose any sleep if it doesn't work, though. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R: > RC4 is missing Wine and TigerVNC. The Xfce spin never shipped wine or TigerVNC, actually I am not aware of any spin or media that ships them and if, it would have been more than 10 MB difference in size. Kind regrds, Christoph -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
RC4 is missing Wine and TigerVNC. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Last Minute Testing for Fedora 18 RC4
We find ourselves in a bit of an odd position for Fedora 18 - RC3 is go, but we need to finalize some testing in order to decide whether or not RC4 will supersede RC3 as the released version of Fedora 18. To that end, we have some testing to do. Since the change between RC2 and RC4 is so small, I've gone through and pulled results from RC2 and RC3 where appropriate into the test matrices (mostly the installation test matrices [1]). If you end up re-running any test cases, please overwrite any results marked 'previous RCX run'. Pulling results through isn't an indication that more testing isn't welcome, just that we don't think it's strictly _required_ for RC4. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test The testing that we're most interested in is the various desktop environments with an emphasis on the display managers (gdm, kdm, lightdm etc.) because any show-stopping problems are most likely to exist there. The second most likely place is inside any of the livecd desktop environments (kde, gnome, xfce etc.). To that end, if you have the time to download RC4 [2] and run through some or all of the desktop test cases [3], please do. The more testing we get on RC4, the easier tomorrow's decision to choose RC3 or RC4 will be. [2] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/18-RC4/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Happy testing, Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
