Re: Criteria revision proposal: Expected installed system boot behavior (Alpha)
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 06:28 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 07:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented > > > > during installation and/or first boot of the installed system. > > > > > > > > A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in > > > > screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user > > > > account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." > > > > > > > > The third criterion, "A system installed without a graphical package set > > > > must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one > > > > of the default virtual consoles.", remains unchanged. > > > > > > > > We add one more 'footnote': > > > > > > > > "On the first boot after installation, a utility for creating user > > > > accounts and other configuration may run prior to a log in screen > > > > appearing." > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > Any more feedback on this one before I throw it into production? Thanks! > > Same here. It's pretty clear, not enforcing any "must be this way and only > this way", so +1. Thanks. As no-one raised any objections, I'm going to go ahead and implement the change now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Criteria revision proposal: Expected installed system boot behavior (Alpha)
- Original Message - > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 07:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented > > > during installation and/or first boot of the installed system. > > > > > > A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in > > > screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user > > > account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." > > > > > > The third criterion, "A system installed without a graphical package set > > > must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one > > > of the default virtual consoles.", remains unchanged. > > > > > > We add one more 'footnote': > > > > > > "On the first boot after installation, a utility for creating user > > > accounts and other configuration may run prior to a log in screen > > > appearing." > > > > Sounds good. > > Any more feedback on this one before I throw it into production? Thanks! Same here. It's pretty clear, not enforcing any "must be this way and only this way", so +1. Jaroslav > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Criteria revision proposal: Expected installed system boot behavior (Alpha)
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 07:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented > > during installation and/or first boot of the installed system. > > > > A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in > > screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user > > account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." > > > > The third criterion, "A system installed without a graphical package set > > must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one > > of the default virtual consoles.", remains unchanged. > > > > We add one more 'footnote': > > > > "On the first boot after installation, a utility for creating user > > accounts and other configuration may run prior to a log in screen > > appearing." > > Sounds good. Any more feedback on this one before I throw it into production? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Criteria revision proposal: Expected installed system boot behavior (Alpha)
> "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented > during installation and/or first boot of the installed system. > > A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in > screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user > account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." > > The third criterion, "A system installed without a graphical package set > must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one > of the default virtual consoles.", remains unchanged. > > We add one more 'footnote': > > "On the first boot after installation, a utility for creating user > accounts and other configuration may run prior to a log in screen > appearing." Sounds good. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Criteria revision proposal: Expected installed system boot behavior (Alpha)
As per https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/391 and the Retrospective, we really need to adjust the "Expected installed system boot behavior" criteria for the new world of user creation in anaconda and initial-setup and gnome-initial-setup replacing firstboot. After some thought, I propose that the most straightforward way to do this is with the following changes to the Alpha criteria. Reference this section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Expected_installed_system_boot_behavior We could replace the first two "Expected installed system boot behaviour" criteria with these: "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented during installation and/or first boot of the installed system. A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." The third criterion, "A system installed without a graphical package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual consoles.", remains unchanged. We add one more 'footnote': "On the first boot after installation, a utility for creating user accounts and other configuration may run prior to a log in screen appearing." I think that covers the changed situation and does not create any unrealistic requirements. Any thoughts, comments, improvements, questions etc? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
