Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-06 Thread John Poelstra
John Poelstra said the following on 08/05/2010 08:35 PM Pacific Time:
> Meeting at our regular time and location!
>
> When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)
> Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers
>
> Please join us.  Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss:
>
> 621102 :: NEW :: udev :: Harald Hoyer :: The installer doesn't use
> packages repository in DVD as default ::
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102
>
>
> 621200 :: ASSIGNED :: systemd :: Lennart Poettering :: [abrt]
> systemd-units-5-2.fc15: selabel_lookup_common: Process /bin/systemctl
> was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ::
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621200
>
>

==
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Review
==


Meeting started by poelcat at 16:01:13 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-08-06/fedora_14_alpha_blocker_review.2010-08-06-16.01.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---
* attendees: fcami nirik jlaska adamw damNageHack  (poelcat, 16:05:09)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211  (poelcat,
   16:05:52)
   * LINK:
 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2371327&name=build.log&offset=-4000
 (adamw, 16:08:21)
   * Options to resolve include 1) Either remove the python-psyco package
 from i386 DVD, or 2) Correct py-2.7 build issues and rebuild
 python-psyco  (jlaska, 16:11:01)
   * LINK: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/da03d23e29b9   (adamw,
 16:19:35)
   * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211 adamw has
 the ball right now ... attempting a rebuild ... will pull in others
 if that fails adamw to try rebuilding based on
 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/da03d23e29b9 + set to accepted
 blocker + adamw to update bug comments  (poelcat, 16:22:21)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102  (poelcat,
   16:22:40)
   * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102  does not
 meet alpha criteria, however does meet beta criteria + set as
 accepted blocker for beta + add to common bugs page; adamw to
 document all  (poelcat, 16:37:21)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621775  (poelcat,
   16:37:35)
   * ACTION: : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621775
 dgilmore is trying to identify root cause, believed to be a compose
 issue; accepted alpha blocker, stickster will update the bug
 (poelcat, 16:51:58)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621864  (poelcat,
   16:52:11)
   * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621864 NOT
 accepted as an alpha blocker, move to target, fcami check it out and
 re-propose it if something bad shows up; fcami will update bug
 appropriately  (poelcat, 16:58:29)

* open discussion  (poelcat, 16:58:39)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=609049  (poelcat,
   16:59:48)
   * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=609049
 new udev package has been built for udev; need to retest  (poelcat,
 17:01:01)

* Where are the next steps towards getting another F14 Alpha RC?
   (poelcat, 17:03:10)
   * we'll watch for status in
 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3860  (poelcat, 17:06:25)
   * ACTION: add bugs discussed today to trac ticket, get them fixed and
 built, wait for new compose that hopefully can be ready tonight
 (poelcat, 17:12:10)

* xorg vmware  (poelcat, 17:12:38)
   * F14 can't bring Xorg when running as a vmware guest  (poelcat,
 17:14:46)
   * ACTION: file a bug and throw it on f14beta  (poelcat, 17:14:55)

* Open discussion  (poelcat, 17:15:03)

Meeting ended at 17:17:09 UTC.




Action Items

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211 adamw has the ball
   right now ... attempting a rebuild ... will pull in others if that
   fails adamw to try rebuilding based on
   http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/da03d23e29b9 + set to accepted
   blocker + adamw to update bug comments
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102  does not meet
   alpha criteria, however does meet beta criteria + set as accepted
   blocker for beta + add to common bugs page; adamw to document all
* : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621775 dgilmore is
   trying to identify root cause, believed to be a compose issue;
   accepted alpha blocker, stickster will update the bug
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621864 NOT accepted as an
   alpha blocker, move to target, fcami check it out and re-propose it if
   something bad shows up; fcami will update bug appropriately
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=609049 new udev
   package has been built for udev; need to retest
* add bugs discussed today to trac ticket, get them fixed and built,
   wait for new compose that hopefully can be ready tonight
* file a bug and throw it on f14beta

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:13:00 -0400
James Laska  wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:57 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > > 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: kon...@tylerc.org ::
> > > python-psyco needs porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211
> > 
> > Does anything actually depend on this?
> 
> It's part of the Alpha release criteria [1] that no deps or conflicts
> are present on physical media (DVD/CD).  This seems to have slipped
> through through first scrubbing of the list yesterday.
> 
> No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a
> media-based (CD/DVD) install 
> 
> If nothing pulls this into an install transaction on DVD/CD, and it
> isn't listed in comps.xml, should it be removed from the media?  
> 
> Also, the package is only included in the i386 DVD, not the x86_64
> DVD ... not sure why.

It's 32bit only. :) The package uses asm that is not available for
x86_64. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-06 Thread James Laska
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:57 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: kon...@tylerc.org :: python-psyco needs
> > porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211
> 
> Does anything actually depend on this?

It's part of the Alpha release criteria [1] that no deps or conflicts
are present on physical media (DVD/CD).  This seems to have slipped
through through first scrubbing of the list yesterday.

No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a
media-based (CD/DVD) install 

If nothing pulls this into an install transaction on DVD/CD, and it
isn't listed in comps.xml, should it be removed from the media?  

Also, the package is only included in the i386 DVD, not the x86_64
DVD ... not sure why.

Thanks,
James

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-06 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: kon...@tylerc.org :: python-psyco needs
> porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211

Does anything actually depend on this?

~spot

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-06 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:35 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Meeting at our regular time and location!
> 
> When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)
> Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers
> 
> Please join us.  Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss:
> 
> 621102 :: NEW :: udev :: Harald Hoyer :: The installer doesn't use 
> packages repository in DVD as default :: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102
> 
> 
> 621200 :: ASSIGNED :: systemd :: Lennart Poettering :: [abrt] 
> systemd-units-5-2.fc15: selabel_lookup_common: Process /bin/systemctl 
> was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) :: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621200

Greetings,

Early testing of RC#1 has added several issues to the list for review,
including the following:

621775 :: NEW :: anaconda :: anaconda-maint-l...@redhat.com :: kernel
panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(9,2) :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621775

621102 :: NEW :: udev :: har...@redhat.com :: The installer doesn't use
packages repository in DVD as default ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102

620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: kon...@tylerc.org :: python-psyco needs
porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211

I'm not able to join the blocker review meeting today.  I've walked
through the list of bugs and updated states to match the test status and
bodhi status.  It seems bugs are not being moved to ON_QA when a bodhi
update is available (even though the bug# is listed in the bodhi
update).

Thanks,
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

2010-08-05 Thread John Poelstra
Meeting at our regular time and location!

When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)
Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers

Please join us.  Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss:

621102 :: NEW :: udev :: Harald Hoyer :: The installer doesn't use 
packages repository in DVD as default :: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621102


621200 :: ASSIGNED :: systemd :: Lennart Poettering :: [abrt] 
systemd-units-5-2.fc15: selabel_lookup_common: Process /bin/systemctl 
was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) :: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621200


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test