Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 18:25:31 -0800,
  Adam Williamson  wrote:


Misc: I haven't filed bureaucracy bugs for them yet, but we do still
need to make sure the final artwork, release notes, fedora-release (and
generic-release) and spin-kickstarts are all in place prior to ship.


spin-kickstarts-0.20.21 is in updates-testing and is currently OK to use 
in final. If a change is made (to say get the desktop spin under size), 
then it will need to be rebuilt.


The rebuild process for spin-kickstarts is simpler now and it is easier 
to know that the package is up to date, than it was for previous releases.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If something is FTBFS there ought to be a bug report for it - have you
> attached the patch there? Thanks!

Yep. There's a FTBFS bug report and I've attached the updated spec with
required changes to it.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992332
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 18:15 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 12:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > ncmpcpp in
> > Fedora is in FTBFS status.
> 
> Updated spec with fix attached. It's just the new unversioned package
> doc dir change. 

If something is FTBFS there ought to be a bug report for it - have you
attached the patch there? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 15:18 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Yes, but we still need to wait for the irresponsive maintainer
> maybe...

A proven packager could apply the update in time being. I'll try to get
in touch with the maintainer to request co-maintainership of the package
since I use it on a daily basis. 
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Christopher Meng
Yes, but we still need to wait for the irresponsive maintainer maybe...
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 12:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> ncmpcpp in
> Fedora is in FTBFS status.

Updated spec with fix attached. It's just the new unversioned package
doc dir change. 
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Christopher Meng
I've added 2 karma on system-config-services and taglib.

However after looking into taglib issue deeply I found that ncmpcpp in
Fedora is in FTBFS status.

Thanks.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go meeting
comprehensively and comfortably, we would need a build with all these
bugs addressed by the end of next Tuesday (2013-12-03). To have a chance
at just making it by the skin of our teeth, we'd need a build with these
bugs addressed by the end of next Wednesday (2013-12-04). Anything later
than that means the release will be delayed.

Here's my round-up of the status of all the currently open blockers, and
the action needed to move forwards on all of them. If you're personally
CCed on this mail, it means you have an outstanding blocker bug assigned
to you or you are clearly involved in working on one: search this mail
for your name or email identifier to find the bits relevant to you.

The full list of proposed and accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs
can always be viewed at
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current .

QA: karma required
--

QA folks, we need karma on the following updates. The blocker bug fixes
have all been confirmed, but we need a few more people to check and
provide +1 karma before these can go stable:

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21928 (anaconda,
blivet, pykickstart: +1 if TC3 install is basically OK)

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22183 (sqlite:
check things that use sqlite are OK, the specific bugfix to check is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034714 )

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21347
(system-config-services, the bug is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790339 : +1 if it runs and
works)

It would also be good to get karma on the following updates for freeze
exception issues:

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glib2-2.38.2-2.fc20 for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035423 "Use after free
causes critical warnings in g-s-d, potential crasher"

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21747 for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035066 "Volume gets
restored to 100% after each knotify event"

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22176
(kde-settings) for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034828
"Enable kwallet Silently Create Initial Wallet=true feature by default"

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22263
(xorg-x11-drv-qxl) for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020393 "Very sluggish
graphical performance in qxl/spice guests with spice streaming enabled
(default configuration)"

* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22185 (taglib) for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026080 "[abrt]
amarok-2.8.0-3.fc19.1: getDisplay: Process /usr/bin/amarok was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)"

Developers: fixes required
--

These remaining outstanding blockers are mostly still unaddressed and
require fixes from developers.

anaconda/python-blivet/installer stack
--

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020974 "incorrectly
treats a disk with partially corrupt GPT as having no partition at all"
- this one is clearly defined and simply awaiting developer attention.
Assigned to bcl.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027947 "Cannot change a
partition's size, then return it to the original size" - this was opened
for a crasher. The crash was fixed, but the behaviour is still incorrect
and requires further developer attention. Assigned to dlehman.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027965 "CreateException:
Can't have a partition outside the disk!" - this one again seems clearly
defined and waiting on developer attention. Not yet assigned to a
specific developer.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028367 "Invalid resize
operation crashes" - very similar to the previous bug, but different
crash. Again waiting for a developer.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035462 "
initial-setup-text only displays timezone spoke" - seems like this
regressed in Final TC3, for some reason. Critical issue for ARM text
deployments. Assigned to vpodzime, waiting for his attention.

systemd
---

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006386 "Journal flushing
often slow, can prevent system booting correctly" - there's active work
going on on this one, but we're still short a definite fix. Michal
Schmidt and Lennart seem to be working on it.

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026860 "Instantiated
service is not run, it stays in inactive state (and systemd debug log
does not state why)" - this is a somewhat complex issue which appears to
sometimes (and sometimes not) affect activation of LVM volumes on top of
mdraid. Again, devs (Peter Rajnoha and Lennart) seem to be actively
working on it, but pinning it down is proving tricky.

others