Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
Hi, The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC The demo repository has been setted up here[1]. The repo includes following:- 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone. 2. There are 5 levels of priority: 1. Blocker 2. Critical 3. Major 4. Minor 5. Trivial 3. The keywords, component and type are mentioned as TAGS. 4. I have updated few tickets (#471, #472, #489, #491, #493, #494, #495, #496) for demo. [1]https://stg.pagure.io/test-fedoraqa-2 Feel free to suggest or report if anything seems wrong. Regards Kanika (a2batic) ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
> Hi, > The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC > The demo repository has been setted up here[1]. > The repo includes following:- > 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone. > 2. There are 5 levels of priority: > 1. Blocker > 2. Critical > 3. Major > 4. Minor > 5. Trivial I'd personally simply use: 1. critical 2. normal 3. wishlist Thoughts? Or do we need the full set of priorities to convert existing tickets properly? (If we can influence it, blocker+critical would go to critical, major+minor+trivial would go to normal). ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 06:45 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hi, > > The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC > > The demo repository has been setted up here[1]. > > The repo includes following:- > > 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone. > > 2. There are 5 levels of priority: > > 1. Blocker > > 2. Critical > > 3. Major > > 4. Minor > > 5. Trivial > > I'd personally simply use: > 1. critical > 2. normal > 3. wishlist > > Thoughts? I honestly don't care :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On 19 January 2017 at 17:15, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi, > > The migration will taken place on 20th Jan from 6:00 UTC to 14:00 UTC > The demo repository has been setted up here[1]. > The repo includes following:- > 1. Roadmap contains all the milestone. > 2. There are 5 levels of priority: > >1. Blocker >2. Critical >3. Major >4. Minor >5. Trivial > > > I'd personally simply use: > 1. critical > 2. normal > 3. wishlist > > Thoughts? Or do we need the full set of priorities to convert existing > tickets properly? (If we can influence it, blocker+critical would go to > critical, major+minor+trivial would go to normal). > > We will go for this then. Starting with Migration :) > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
Hi, Thanks for the patience and sorry for the noise on mails. Fedora QA on fedorahosted[1], has been successfully shifted to pagure[2]. Few tickets are left for tagging, will be completed in this weekend. While going through repo, if you find something wrong, please reply to this thread . [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa Thanks Kanika(a2batic) ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 14:36 +, Kanika Murarka wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patience and sorry for the noise on mails. Fedora QA on > fedorahosted[1], has been successfully shifted to pagure[2]. Few tickets are > left for tagging, will be completed in this weekend. > While going through repo, if you find something wrong, please reply to this > thread . > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ > [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa Er...sorry, I should've realized we never settled the question of what the new repository should be called. What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff like: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou? A good next step for you (Kanika) would be to look for references to Trac, and update them to point to Pagure instead, but we should probably decide whether this will be the final location before updating any links :) Thanks for the work! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On Jan 21, 2017 4:21 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 14:36 +, Kanika Murarka wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patience and sorry for the noise on mails. Fedora QA on fedorahosted[1], has been successfully shifted to pagure[2]. Few tickets are left for tagging, will be completed in this weekend. > While going through repo, if you find something wrong, please reply to this thread . > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ > [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa Er...sorry, I should've realized we never settled the question of what the new repository should be called. What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff like: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou? A good next step for you (Kanika) would be to look for references to Trac, and update them to point to Pagure instead, but we should probably decide whether this will be the final location before updating any links :) Thanks for the work! Thanks Adam, will be looking forward for Pingou's reply :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
> What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have > fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff > like: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora > > but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own > right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we > should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in > Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou? A relevant conversation: https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/1773 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:46 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have > > fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff > > like: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora > > > > but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own > > right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we > > should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in > > Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou? > > A relevant conversation: > https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/1773 So I talked to Pingou this week at DevConf, and he seems fine with this setup. He's also generally fine with Kamil's ideas about how to display a page for all a namespace's projects even if there's this kind of conflict. So I think we're fine with keeping the fedora-qa project name. Thanks for working on it, Kanika! The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and introduce you to the right people to talk to. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On 30 January 2017 at 15:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:46 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > What we've wound up with is slightly unusual, because we now have > > > fedora-qa as both a namespace and a repository name. We have stuff > > > like: > > > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora > > > > > > but we also have just https://pagure.io/fedora-qa as a repo in its own > > > right. I don't know if this is really a big problem, but I guess we > > > should at least check with pingou if it's likely to cause problems in > > > Pagure and if he thinks it'd be better to change it. Pingou? > > > > A relevant conversation: > > https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/1773 > > So I talked to Pingou this week at DevConf, and he seems fine with this > setup. He's also generally fine with Kamil's ideas about how to display > a page for all a namespace's projects even if there's this kind of > conflict. So I think we're fine with keeping the fedora-qa project > name. Thanks for working on it, Kanika! > Hi Adam, Thanks for reaching out to Pingou. So we can continue the Migration. > > The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source > code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and > change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send > Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update > Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable > submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra > team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on > that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and > introduce you to the right people to talk to. > I still need to update tags on some Pagure tickets, and then we can go further. Sumantro said he can help in updating links on wiki. I will surely ping you if I face some trouble. Thanks Kanika(a2batic) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 16:52 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > > Hi Adam, > Thanks for reaching out to Pingou. So we can continue the Migration. Yep, for sure. > > The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source > > code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and > > change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send > > Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update > > Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable > > submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra > > team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on > > that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and > > introduce you to the right people to talk to. > > I still need to update tags on some Pagure tickets, and then we can > go further. Sumantro said he can help in updating links on wiki. I > will surely ping you if I face some trouble. Absolutely, take it one thing at a time! I assigned the new tickets to you just for now, but if you and Sumantro want to split them up, that's fine too. And if anyone else from the group wants to help out, just speak up - there are some tickets in Pagure for the work described above. Thanks folks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migration of Fedora QA from fedorahosted to pagure
Hey everyone, The pagure repo[1] has been updated. Its ready for use. If you feel something weird with issues or face some problem, please reply to this thread. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa Thanks for your patience Kanika (a2batic) On 30 January 2017 at 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 16:52 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > > > > Hi Adam, > > Thanks for reaching out to Pingou. So we can continue the Migration. > > Yep, for sure. > > > > The next step would be to look through the wiki and maybe the source > > > code of our major projects to find cases where we link to Trac, and > > > change them to link to Pagure instead. For code projects, you can send > > > Phabricator diffs and Pagure pull requests. We should also update > > > Trac's front page to tell people to go to Pagure instead, disable > > > submission of new tickets etc. on Trac, and maybe talk to the infra > > > team about adding redirects from Trac to Pagure. Do you want to work on > > > that next? I can help you out with anything you have trouble with, and > > > introduce you to the right people to talk to. > > > > I still need to update tags on some Pagure tickets, and then we can > > go further. Sumantro said he can help in updating links on wiki. I > > will surely ping you if I face some trouble. > > Absolutely, take it one thing at a time! I assigned the new tickets to > you just for now, but if you and Sumantro want to split them up, that's > fine too. And if anyone else from the group wants to help out, just > speak up - there are some tickets in Pagure for the work described > above. > > Thanks folks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
