Re: NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 12:33 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
 On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 09:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 13:16 +0200, poma wrote:
   On 24.07.2013 01:55, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
Hi,
   
It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, 
in
the least i686.
I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!

Yeah, it's rawhide, so no guarantees :)  That said, we've been waiting a
bit to land some significant work and now that this is mostly done, I
expect refreshed rawhide builds quite soon.
  
  Dan - no guarantees, but we _are_ trying to keep Rawhide functional
  these days, as a project-wide priority. This bug not only causes
  inconvenience on every boot of a Rawhide system, but breaks anaconda:
  
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986068
  
  so at present we can't test F20 installation at all. So it'd be
  appreciated if it could be fixed quickly. Thanks.
 
 Fair enough.

Looks like this is fixed with the new NetworkManager that was built
yesterday, thanks Dan! Note, if you want to grab it before it hits your
mirror, make sure to also grab the 'libdnp' package - NM will fail to
run if that isn't also updated.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-24 Thread poma
On 24.07.2013 01:55, Dan Williams wrote:
 On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
 Hi,

 It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
 Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
 NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
 the least i686.
 I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
 Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!
 
 Yeah, it's rawhide, so no guarantees :)  That said, we've been waiting a
 bit to land some significant work and now that this is mostly done, I
 expect refreshed rawhide builds quite soon.
 
 Dan
 

Okee doke.


poma


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-24 Thread poma
On 24.07.2013 07:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
 Hi,

 It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
 Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
 NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
 the least i686.
 I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
 Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!
 
 When you say 'faulty', do you mean
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985627 ? And current git
 snapshot fixes it?
 

Yep.
I switched to 0.9.8.2-8.git20130709.fc19 till upgrade.
Besides NIC was presented via kernel.


poma


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 13:16 +0200, poma wrote:
 On 24.07.2013 01:55, Dan Williams wrote:
  On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
  Hi,
 
  It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
  Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
  NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
  the least i686.
  I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
  Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!
  
  Yeah, it's rawhide, so no guarantees :)  That said, we've been waiting a
  bit to land some significant work and now that this is mostly done, I
  expect refreshed rawhide builds quite soon.

Dan - no guarantees, but we _are_ trying to keep Rawhide functional
these days, as a project-wide priority. This bug not only causes
inconvenience on every boot of a Rawhide system, but breaks anaconda:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986068

so at present we can't test F20 installation at all. So it'd be
appreciated if it could be fixed quickly. Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-23 Thread poma
Hi,

It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
the least i686.
I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!


poma

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: NetworkManager - rawhide

2013-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
 Hi,
 
 It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
 Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
 NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
 the least i686.
 I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
 Fedora now flying as a kite, wheee!

When you say 'faulty', do you mean
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985627 ? And current git
snapshot fixes it?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test