Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/03/2010 09:51 AM, Stefan Grosse wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:54:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > OP> R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible > OP> split that would make it optional. It should be able to require > OP> tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support. > > Not to forget Sweave: R offers the possibility to create 'dynamic' > statistical reports typeset with LaTeX (very nice feature!) so > "bundeling" absolutely makes sense from my point of view... > > Stefan > > Also note one point was that some of use a different (and newer) version of latex ... so why force a particular and older one ? And besides, if one wants one of those latex-dependent reports just install latex ... I'd much prefer to think of this feature more like a browser plugin - useful, functional nice if you want it .. but not required. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:54:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: OP> R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible OP> split that would make it optional. It should be able to require OP> tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support. Not to forget Sweave: R offers the possibility to create 'dynamic' statistical reports typeset with LaTeX (very nice feature!) so "bundeling" absolutely makes sense from my point of view... Stefan -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 09:17 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >>> >>>Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? >>> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a >>> typesetting language .. ;-) >>> >>> is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least >>> isolate this coupling ? >>> >>> >>> >>>[1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at >>> least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). >> >> R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that >> would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe >> for >> generic latex support. >> >> CC'ing R-owner (spot). >> > > Unfortunately I install texive from upstream and there is no rpm ... > via tlmgr. You could provide your own stub rpm the provided it. Unfortunately, looks like R-devel currently requires tetex-latex, that should get fixed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> >> Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? >> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a >> typesetting language .. ;-) >> >>is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least >> isolate this coupling ? >> >> >> >> [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at >> least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). > > R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that > would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe > for > generic latex support. > > CC'ing R-owner (spot). > Unfortunately I install texive from upstream and there is no rpm ... via tlmgr. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> dikshie wrote: >> >>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? >> >> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of >> those just done recently was texlive. >> >> -- Rex >> >> > > Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? > It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a > typesetting language .. ;-) > >is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least > isolate this coupling ? > > > > [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at > least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). R uses latex for documentation. Not sure if there is a sensible split that would make it optional. It should be able to require tex(latex) I believe for generic latex support. CC'ing R-owner (spot). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > dikshie wrote: > >> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? > > Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of > those just done recently was texlive. > > -- Rex > > Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]? It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a typesetting language .. ;-) is there any way to make an R-reports or R-docs package to at least isolate this coupling ? [1] Some of us are using different tex than the fedora texlive (at least on f13 the texlive is too out of date (missing biblatex for example). -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
dikshie wrote: > anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide? Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of those just done recently was texlive. -- Rex -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: R -> texlive -> libpoppler
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:35:45 +0900, dikshie wrote: > Hi, > anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide? There is no "fedora 14 rawhide". Rawhide currently is Fedora 15 development. The broken dependencies in there are reported with the daily "rawhide report". -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
R -> texlive -> libpoppler
Hi, anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide? Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package R.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: R-devel = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package: R-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package R-devel.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: R-core = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package: R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: tetex-latex for package: R-devel-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package R-core.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive-dvips for package: R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: cups for package: R-core-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-latex.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-latex = 2007 for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive-utils = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/texconfig-sys for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/fmtutil for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package cups.x86_64 1:1.4.4-11.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: poppler-utils for package: 1:cups-1.4.4-11.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: ghostscript-cups for package: 1:cups-1.4.4-11.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-fonts = 2007 for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007 for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-dvips.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf-dvips = 2007 for package: texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-texmf-latex.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: tex-preview for package: texlive-texmf-latex-2007-36.fc14.noarch ---> Package texlive-utils.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Running transaction check ---> Package ghostscript-cups.x86_64 0:9.00-2.fc15 set to be installed ---> Package poppler-utils.x86_64 0:0.15.0-4.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: poppler = 0.15.0-4.fc15 for package: poppler-utils-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.8()(64bit) for package: poppler-utils-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.86-4.fc14 set to be installed ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed ---> Package texlive-texmf-dvips.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed ---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed --> Running transaction check ---> Package poppler.x86_64 0:0.15.0-4.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: poppler-data >= 0.4.0 for package: poppler-0.15.0-4.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package poppler-data.noarch 0:0.4.3-1.fc14 set to be installed ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: libpoppler.so.7()(64bit) for package: texlive-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution rawhide/filelists_db | 19 MB 00:01 --> Running transaction check ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-utils-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-texmf.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007-36.fc14 for package: texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-36.fc14.noarch --> Processing Dependency: texlive-texmf = 2007-36.fc14 for package: texlive-texmf-latex-2007-36.fc14.noarch ---> Package texlive-texmf-fonts.noarch 0:2007-36.fc14 set to be installed --> Running transaction check ---> Package texlive.x86_64 0:2007-56.fc15 set to be installed --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-dvips-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-56.fc15 for package: texlive-utils-2007-56.fc15.x86_64 --> Pr
