Re: RC status update - please pull livecd-tools-16.8 into buildroot
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 03:56:37PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > El Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:26:45 -0700 > Adam Williamson escribió: > > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 11:58 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > > > > > > > > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd > > > > > images pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 > > > > > didn't have it. > > > > > > > > I see in the koji task that 16.6 was still in the buildroot > > > > (root.log) despite 16.8 being in stable. Can you please be sure > > > > to pull 16.8 into the buildroot for future RC's? Thanks. > > > > > > There won't necessarily *be* any future RCs, but I'll talk to dennis > > > about it. > > > > We're going to a silent re-spin (so don't tell anyone!) of the RC2 > > lives, using livecd-tools-16.8. It's a single pretty well-tested > > change so should be fine. Only impact is on the kernel parameters > > used when booting live via EFI. Should be up in 3hrs or so, will > > simply silently replace the existing RC2 live images. > > and its done. new images in place. please test. Thanks for the re-spin! Tested Live Desktop x86_64 both EFI and non-EFI, works fine and fixes the kernel args. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update - please pull livecd-tools-16.8 into buildroot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:26:45 -0700 Adam Williamson escribió: > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 11:58 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > > > > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > > > > > > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd > > > > images pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 > > > > didn't have it. > > > > > > I see in the koji task that 16.6 was still in the buildroot > > > (root.log) despite 16.8 being in stable. Can you please be sure > > > to pull 16.8 into the buildroot for future RC's? Thanks. > > > > There won't necessarily *be* any future RCs, but I'll talk to dennis > > about it. > > We're going to a silent re-spin (so don't tell anyone!) of the RC2 > lives, using livecd-tools-16.8. It's a single pretty well-tested > change so should be fine. Only impact is on the kernel parameters > used when booting live via EFI. Should be up in 3hrs or so, will > simply silently replace the existing RC2 live images. and its done. new images in place. please test. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6tug0ACgkQkSxm47BaWfdiugCgmdV0r5uP1qLPLsJcyV0ua2eI Qs8AoKD6pR8chDcSQa/kHax7i2pSpnok =n7jF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update - please pull livecd-tools-16.8 into buildroot
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 11:58 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > > > > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd images > > > pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 didn't have it. > > > > I see in the koji task that 16.6 was still in the buildroot (root.log) > > despite 16.8 being in stable. Can you please be sure to pull 16.8 > > into the buildroot for future RC's? Thanks. > > There won't necessarily *be* any future RCs, but I'll talk to dennis > about it. We're going to a silent re-spin (so don't tell anyone!) of the RC2 lives, using livecd-tools-16.8. It's a single pretty well-tested change so should be fine. Only impact is on the kernel parameters used when booting live via EFI. Should be up in 3hrs or so, will simply silently replace the existing RC2 live images. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update - please pull livecd-tools-16.8 into buildroot
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 11:58 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd images > > pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 didn't have it. > > I see in the koji task that 16.6 was still in the buildroot (root.log) > despite 16.8 being in stable. Can you please be sure to pull 16.8 > into the buildroot for future RC's? Thanks. There won't necessarily *be* any future RCs, but I'll talk to dennis about it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 10:11 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd images > pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 didn't have it. Erf. It should have been, I put that build on the list, and the package is in http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/bleed/x86_64/ . Dennis? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update - please pull livecd-tools-16.8 into buildroot
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:11:07AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 > > Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd images > pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 didn't have it. I see in the koji task that 16.6 was still in the buildroot (root.log) despite 16.8 being in stable. Can you please be sure to pull 16.8 into the buildroot for future RC's? Thanks. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RC status update
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 Will this build be done with livecd-tools-16.8 so the livecd images pick up the fix for efi boot rd.* kernel args? RC1 didn't have it. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RC status update
Hey folks, just to let you know - I've requested an RC2 build: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4967#comment:6 but with only a single change from RC1. RC1 testing ought to be basically valid, and so please do continue testing RC1 up until RC2 is available. Once RC2 shows up, please focus first on tests that weren't done for RC1; we can combine the RC1 and RC2 results for the go/no-go call. thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
