Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes
On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote: Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012 VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18! Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way! ~tom == Fedora Project -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote: Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012 VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18! pops cork Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way! ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:07:15 -0500, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote: Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012 VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18! Thanks for your work with this. You inspired me to try to fix up some of the broken deps in rawhide that looked easy to fix and had been sitting around for a while. Now I need to help Martin with getting stuff rebuilt for the latest Ogre. P.S. There is still some texlive brokenness in F18. If you have the latest texlive stuff installed and try to install db-latex it pulls in some old texlive stuff (that I think should be removed) that has file conflicts with the corresponding new texlive packages. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes
On 12/04/2012 10:21 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: P.S. There is still some texlive brokenness in F18. If you have the latest texlive stuff installed and try to install db-latex it pulls in some old texlive stuff (that I think should be removed) that has file conflicts with the corresponding new texlive packages. If you can identify that, we'll go ahead and block those packages. Jindrich has been working hard to identify any remaining cases like you describe, and I'm happy to help. ~tom == Fedora Project -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F-18 Branched report: 20121204 changes
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:44:11 -0500, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/04/2012 10:21 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: P.S. There is still some texlive brokenness in F18. If you have the latest texlive stuff installed and try to install db-latex it pulls in some old texlive stuff (that I think should be removed) that has file conflicts with the corresponding new texlive packages. If you can identify that, we'll go ahead and block those packages. Jindrich has been working hard to identify any remaining cases like you describe, and I'm happy to help. I've been meaning to file bugs for the three affected packages. I'll get to it today. I don't think dblatex has a texlive varient yet, but maybe I can copy him on that one. For the two packages that appear to be obsolete, I'll file the bugs against the texlive variants so they are more likely to be seen by the right person. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
