Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 09.06.2015 16:47, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: >>> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. Currently tested with: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>> >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> >>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>> >> >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >> > > > Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of > - Test compilation: > http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO > ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso > > Failed to mount /sysroot https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 >>> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 >>> From mezcalero: >>> >>> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file >>> system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as >>> mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel >>> in general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the >>> initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. >>> >>> >>> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. >>> >>> >> >> Maybe >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87f2dd794b7a4df37ce5d1c8407 >> >> in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules >> > > Actually, no... it tries: > > sysroot.mount: About to execute: /usr/bin/mount live:CDLABEL=LiveCD /sysroot > -n > -o rw > Is <97><8F> just a "cosmetic" issue? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: >> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: >>> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: > On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >>> >>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >>> >>> Currently tested with: >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>> >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >> > > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso > Failed to mount /sysroot > > 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot > - systemd-220-5.fc23 > - systemd-220-3.fc23 > - systemd-220-2.fc23 > - systemd-220-1.fc23 > Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of - Test compilation: http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso >>> >>> >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 >>> >>> >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 >> From mezcalero: >> >> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file >> system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as >> mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in >> general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the >> initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. >> >> >> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. >> >> > > Maybe > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87f2dd794b7a4df37ce5d1c8407 > > in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules > Actually, no... it tries: sysroot.mount: About to execute: /usr/bin/mount live:CDLABEL=LiveCD /sysroot -n -o rw -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: > On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: >> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: >>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: > On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >> >> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >> >> Currently tested with: >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >> > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso > Failed to mount /sysroot > > Is there a report on the bootability of these images? > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso Failed to mount /sysroot 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot - systemd-220-5.fc23 - systemd-220-3.fc23 - systemd-220-2.fc23 - systemd-220-1.fc23 >>> >>> >>> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of >>> - Test compilation: >>> http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO >>> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso >>> >>> >> >> >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 >> >> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 > From mezcalero: > > Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file > system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs > or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. > Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, > util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. > > > Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. > > Maybe http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87f2dd794b7a4df37ce5d1c8407 in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: >> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: > > "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. > > Currently tested with: > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso Failed to mount /sysroot Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>> >>> >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> >>> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >>> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >>> >> >> >> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of >> - Test compilation: >> http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO >> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso >> >> > > > Failed to mount /sysroot > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 From mezcalero: Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. Currently tested with: Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>> >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> >>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>> >> >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >> > > > Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of > - Test compilation: > http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO > ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso > > Failed to mount /sysroot https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 08.06.2015 21:00, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:23:51PM +0200, poma wrote: >> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >> - systemd-220-1.fc23 > > It is not enough context to tell if this is the same bug, or if it is > related, but 220 series of systemd has definite troubles of mounting > file systems referenced by labels. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227537 > > There is a fix https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/fa05e972.diff > but compiled later systemd-220-5.fc23 is buggy in the same way. > systemd-219 does not suffer from this issue. > >Michal > That's different issue. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:23:51PM +0200, poma wrote: > On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso > Failed to mount /sysroot > > 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot > - systemd-220-5.fc23 > - systemd-220-3.fc23 > - systemd-220-2.fc23 > - systemd-220-1.fc23 It is not enough context to tell if this is the same bug, or if it is related, but 220 series of systemd has definite troubles of mounting file systems referenced by labels. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227537 There is a fix https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/fa05e972.diff but compiled later systemd-220-5.fc23 is buggy in the same way. systemd-219 does not suffer from this issue. Michal -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: > On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >>> >>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >>> >>> Currently tested with: >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>> >> >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> >> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >> > > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso > Failed to mount /sysroot > > 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot > - systemd-220-5.fc23 > - systemd-220-3.fc23 > - systemd-220-2.fc23 > - systemd-220-1.fc23 > Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of - Test compilation: http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: > On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >> >> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >> >> Currently tested with: >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >> > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso > Failed to mount /sysroot > > Is there a report on the bootability of these images? > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso Failed to mount /sysroot 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot - systemd-220-5.fc23 - systemd-220-3.fc23 - systemd-220-2.fc23 - systemd-220-1.fc23 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: > > "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. > > Currently tested with: > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso Failed to mount /sysroot Is there a report on the bootability of these images? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
On 01.06.2015 14:35, birger wrote: > Boot an older image, update everything related to grub, mkinitrd and > dracut. Then do a new grub2-install and mkinitrd on that newest > initramfs. Seems to have worked for me on multiple f21 systems that got the > same problem going from 3.18 to 3.19 > kernels. > E It is the LIVE image that we are talking about here, not already installed system. Live image list in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id > > > ma., 01.06.2015 kl. 09.15 +0200, skrev poma: >> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >> >> Currently tested with: >> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >> >> -- >> test mailing list >> test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to mount /sysroot
Boot an older image, update everything related to grub, mkinitrd and dracut. Then do a new grub2-install and mkinitrd on that newest initramfs. Seems to have worked for me on multiple f21 systems that got the same problem going from 3.18 to 3.19 kernels. ma., 01.06.2015 kl. 09.15 +0200, skrev poma: > "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. > > Currently tested with: > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
