Re: boot... round 2
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 15:59 +0200, poma wrote: This hardening crap certainly breaking it https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages?rd=Changes /Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code Except if you compare the compiler and linker flags in the F21 and F23 builds, they appear to be the same, so I don't think it's actually to do with the hardening. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On 23.06.2015 01:27, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/ boot.iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/ Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso are broken at early boot stage - isolinux. syslinux got rebuilt with hardening: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=662410 note that the 6.03-3 build attempt on 2015-02-21 failed, so this was actually the first successful build with the hardening change. I'd guess that may be related. I'll try a build with the hardening removed. So this is definitely some kind of Rawhide compiler configuration issue, I think. I rebuilt from the same .src.rpm (same as -4 but with %undefine _hardened_build added) twice, once for F23, once for F21, and created live images with both builds. The F23 one still doesn't boot - seems like %undefine _hardened_build isn't enough - but an F23 live image with an F21 build of isolinux does boot. I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds. This hardening crap certainly breaking it https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages?rd=Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code Peter, can you explain why this is happening? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
syslinux and variants aren't used for UEFI booting, where GRUB is used instead. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On 22.06.2015 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: syslinux and variants aren't used for UEFI booting, where GRUB is used instead. You are indeed a source of a great knowledge! So do they walk with the GRUB? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/ boot.iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/ Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso are broken at early boot stage - isolinux. syslinux got rebuilt with hardening: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=662410 note that the 6.03-3 build attempt on 2015-02-21 failed, so this was actually the first successful build with the hardening change. I'd guess that may be related. I'll try a build with the hardening removed. So this is definitely some kind of Rawhide compiler configuration issue, I think. I rebuilt from the same .src.rpm (same as -4 but with %undefine _hardened_build added) twice, once for F23, once for F21, and created live images with both builds. The F23 one still doesn't boot - seems like %undefine _hardened_build isn't enough - but an F23 live image with an F21 build of isolinux does boot. I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:27:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/ boot.iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/ Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso are broken at early boot stage - isolinux. syslinux got rebuilt with hardening: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=662410 note that the 6.03-3 build attempt on 2015-02-21 failed, so this was actually the first successful build with the hardening change. I'd guess that may be related. I'll try a build with the hardening removed. So this is definitely some kind of Rawhide compiler configuration issue, I think. I rebuilt from the same .src.rpm (same as -4 but with %undefine _hardened_build added) twice, once for F23, once for F21, and created live images with both builds. The F23 one still doesn't boot - seems like %undefine _hardened_build isn't enough - but an F23 live image with an F21 build of isolinux does boot. I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds. Same version of GCC?? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. - Proverbs 15:3 (niv) - -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/ boot.iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/ Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso are broken at early boot stage - isolinux. syslinux got rebuilt with hardening: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=662410 note that the 6.03-3 build attempt on 2015-02-21 failed, so this was actually the first successful build with the hardening change. I'd guess that may be related. I'll try a build with the hardening removed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 16:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/ boot.iso https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/ Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso are broken at early boot stage - isolinux. syslinux got rebuilt with hardening: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=662410 note that the 6.03-3 build attempt on 2015-02-21 failed, so this was actually the first successful build with the hardening change. I'd guess that may be related. I'll try a build with the hardening removed. So this is definitely some kind of Rawhide compiler configuration issue, I think. I rebuilt from the same .src.rpm (same as -4 but with %undefine _hardened_build added) twice, once for F23, once for F21, and created live images with both builds. The F23 one still doesn't boot - seems like %undefine _hardened_build isn't enough - but an F23 live image with an F21 build of isolinux does boot. I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds. I haven't managed to figure out the precise cause yet, but I've filed a bug with what I managed to work out so far: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234653 . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: boot... round 2
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 20:58 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds. Same version of GCC?? No, but that doesn't mean that's the important factor. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
