Re: dnf vs yum
On Sat, 23 May 2015, Russel Winder wrote: > I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-) > > However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I > assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find > out what the dependencies were, but I do not see a way of doing this > with dnf. The dnf help is either not being helpful or I am just > missing the relevant bit. dnf update --best will give you some idea of what the the dependency issues are. With my update to F22 the issues were plymouth packages where the ISO image I used was ahead of the repos (but the packages were in updates-testing) and an xorg package that had gone in F22 and needed to be removed. Michael Young -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum
On 05/23/2015 11:58 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > if you're talking about f22, your issues are likely due to updates-testing > repo recently becoming disabled by default. > > Either re-enable it or run: dnf distro-sync > I also just noticed I now have 2 menu items under System-Administration. 1. Yumex, and Yumex (dnf) first time I clicked on Yumex (dnf) it crashed. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 10:58 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > […] > > if you're talking about f22, your issues are likely due to updates > -testing > repo recently becoming disabled by default. > > Either re-enable it or run: dnf distro-sync I am on Rawhide, but perhaps the same has happened there. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum
HI; I installed Yumex for dnf. Kind Regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Russel Winder An: Fedora_Test Verschickt: Sa, 23 Mai 2015 5:33 pm Betreff: dnf vs yum I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-) However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find out what the dependencies were, but I do not see a way of doing this with dnf. The dnf help is either not being helpful or I am just missing the relevant bit. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum
On 05/23/2015 05:33 PM, Russel Winder wrote: I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-) However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find out what the dependencies were, but I do not see a way of doing this with dnf. The dnf help is either not being helpful or I am just missing the relevant bit. You are likely facing the consequences of the dnf's changes having been discussed in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-April/209697.html ff. I had been facing this issue myself and consider this dnf behavior change to be such kind of harmful and silly, I feel to decision to use dnf on fc22 should be reverted. Ralf -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum
Russel Winder wrote: > I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-) > > However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I > assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find > out what the dependencies were, but I do not see a way of doing this > with dnf. The dnf help is either not being helpful or I am just > missing the relevant bit. if you're talking about f22, your issues are likely due to updates-testing repo recently becoming disabled by default. Either re-enable it or run: dnf distro-sync -- Rex -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
dnf vs yum
I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-) However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find out what the dependencies were, but I do not see a way of doing this with dnf. The dnf help is either not being helpful or I am just missing the relevant bit. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: DNF vs yum performance question
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> Dear Team:
>When running dnf check-update --refresh and comparing to yum
> check-update I've noticed that if the same package occurs in multiple
> repos {aka. local and remote repos for example} that dnf will list all
> packages while yum will list only the package from the repo which
> would be used for update. I'm not sure if this is as desired in dnf
> or just plain cornfusing. Just wanted to point out this is one more
> ideosyncrosity of dnf.
>
dnf check-update lists available updates from the enabled repositories, and
if the same update is available from multiple repos it will be shown twice
check-update is not the same as the resulting transaction of a dnf update.
I does exactly what the man page says it does
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/command_ref.html#check-update-command
and please if your think something is a bug, then make a bugzilla repost,
fdl is not a bugtracker.
Tim
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
DNF vs yum performance question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Team:
When running dnf check-update --refresh and comparing to yum
check-update I've noticed that if the same package occurs in multiple
repos {aka. local and remote repos for example} that dnf will list all
packages while yum will list only the package from the repo which
would be used for update. I'm not sure if this is as desired in dnf
or just plain cornfusing. Just wanted to point out this is one more
ideosyncrosity of dnf.
Sincerely,
Bob Lightfoot
Long Live Yum - LLY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTnmpLAAoJEKqgpLIhfz3X2oEH/1JIBqWbtMiFWeNTYk4aI6Eh
6aK27VjRWQD0E+DVFOrxe2EwwILrWWlEq5q+mZ07Yv5KkPLdonHDvoTKU7QnidBq
YxjVSgiQ8JsqHymWHJ0ejcqFOvcRY9mkDGWpL+/uyWlZhfnkH9DFH+9LmASogAhO
xQ0spU+N0vpouE2X0eXOTWr8BON1/tIvQTbpb++4tC1tMEQH0haAmv1zXarpfW2y
1m+kOeoLnGLjRaSwyQVVQTuvHYrIIXjEWoOGOVyBQZmhGjeXUtQoU9RcomwvDYmo
oXjky6aSLsvutWq7ZC4JQqSO+2bGwwuhOaQstruHeWPuXsZaJC+u0x+Swhz1v70=
=cfVi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
DNF vs yum performance question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Team:
When running dnf check-update --refresh and comparing to yum
check-update I've noticed that if the same package occurs in multiple
repos {aka. local and remote repos for example} that dnf will list all
packages while yum will list only the package from the repo which
would be used for update. I'm not sure if this is as desired in dnf
or just plain cornfusing. Just wanted to point out this is one more
ideosyncrosity of dnf.
Sincerely,
Bob Lightfoot
Long Live Yum - LLY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTnmo0AAoJEKqgpLIhfz3XR1gH/2U3tC/H/6tV9vM/yrwtgrFB
sFMvStVKFjBDFuOjRhnHkeo1rPw0tlLw4lHQPJkV83oXDTW+WKJEMlMv6ITk+3UE
aUlLlQ9TXcKibii3ugvL2t0esklNEOeETL9nW58VoKWog9Ew7uchBa8H3KyVPndv
RVDWDfrjyJkiT8vbxVe029ct8sH/5fPA/9yisaDNxDJdTYe3Km1A+yX6QLXPntjs
W5PMiUzfYuHuXkcTWeL3PJSe+VCYCDDYZKsoYcLfq3nmJ69CJm0NFHpYpc3ZqTks
zjJOvs6+tbRBdC1Mb4tyESaGg77yBVDJXTdZ8LM9QfwCX0tz+POkSMdKIQ1vwkE=
=uQkp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum groups information
On 11/12/2013 08:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: HI On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, nonamedotc wrote: If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient? File a bug report against dnf noting the difference and you will get an authoritative answer as to whether it is a bug or a intended design Rahul Done! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029948 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum groups information
HI On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, nonamedotc wrote: > If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient? > File a bug report against dnf noting the difference and you will get an authoritative answer as to whether it is a bug or a intended design Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum groups information
On 11/12/2013 04:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
nonamedotc (nonamed...@fedoraproject.org) said:
dnf and yum are showing different information for the command
{dnf/yum} groups list.
Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but
it is listed in yum. I am just wondering if this is a bug or if it's
intentional. I would much appreciate it if someone can point me to
relevant documentation.
yum treats 'environments' as groups that can be selected. It appears DNF
does not.
Bill
If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dnf vs yum groups information
nonamedotc (nonamed...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> dnf and yum are showing different information for the command
> {dnf/yum} groups list.
>
> Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but
> it is listed in yum. I am just wondering if this is a bug or if it's
> intentional. I would much appreciate it if someone can point me to
> relevant documentation.
yum treats 'environments' as groups that can be selected. It appears DNF
does not.
Bill
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
dnf vs yum groups information
dnf and yum are showing different information for the command {dnf/yum}
groups list.
Particularly, not all the DE/WM seem to be listed in dnf output but it
is listed in yum. I am just wondering if this is a bug or if it's
intentional. I would much appreciate it if someone can point me to
relevant documentation.
Thanks!
# rpm -qa dnf
dnf-0.4.7-1.fc20.noarch
Here is what I get
# dnf groups list
Installed Groups:
LibreOffice
Editors
Electronic Lab
Milkymist
Network Servers
Office/Productivity
Security Lab
Text-based Internet
Graphical Internet
Sound and Video
Hardware Support
System Tools
Fonts
Design Suite
Development Tools
Available Groups:
Fedora Eclipse
FreeIPA Server
Educational Software
Engineering and Scientific
Medical Applications
Robotics
Window Managers
3D Printing
GNOME Desktop Environment
KDE (K Desktop Environment)
Games and Entertainment
Administration Tools
Authoring and Publishing
Books and Guides
Cloud Infrastructure
RPM Development Tools
C Development Tools and Libraries
==
# yum groups list
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves
Available environment groups:
GNOME Desktop
KDE Plasma Workspaces
Xfce Desktop
LXDE Desktop
Cinnamon Desktop
MATE Desktop
Sugar Desktop Environment
Development and Creative Workstation
Web Server
Infrastructure Server
Basic Desktop
Minimal Install
Available Groups:
3D Printing
Administration Tools
Authoring and Publishing
Books and Guides
C Development Tools and Libraries
Cloud Infrastructure
Design Suite
Development Tools
Editors
Educational Software
Electronic Lab
Engineering and Scientific
Fedora Eclipse
FreeIPA Server
Games and Entertainment
LibreOffice
Medical Applications
Milkymist
Network Servers
Office/Productivity
RPM Development Tools
Robotics
Security Lab
Sound and Video
System Tools
Text-based Internet
Window Managers
==
--
nonamedotc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
