Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error about the package not being signed. This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to update, or if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package. BTW, any special reason for not having --nogpgcheck documented on man fedup ? I'm the reporter of bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863 [1] and I'm trying fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for the package systemd-libs: Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed Is this package also corrected? They all come from the same source package, so yes, it will be. Thanks for the info. -- BrunoJCM -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error about the package not being signed. This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to update, or if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package. I'm the reporter of bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863and I'm trying fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for the package systemd-libs: Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed Is this package also corrected? -- BrunoJCM -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error about the package not being signed. This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to update, or if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package. I'm the reporter of bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863 [1] and I'm trying fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for the package systemd-libs: Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed Is this package also corrected? They all come from the same source package, so yes, it will be. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error about the package not being signed. This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to update, or if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package. Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
