Re: [PATCH] test cgi script
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Anyone see a problem with this? looks ok to me. i checked with sax (who wrote the test), says he doesn't how the 'x' got in there and if he did it, twas a mistake.
Re: mod_random_chunk
On Thursday 01 November 2001 12:57 pm, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Gary Benson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If you remove the "#define HTTPD_TEST_REQUIRE_APACHE 2" from > > mod_random_chunk.c then it compiles and runs successfully but does not > > pass the tests. It seems that it is not sending any headers: should it > > be? > > it would need to call ap_send_http_header(r); #ifdef APACHE1 You could actually call that function in 1.3 or 2.0, the 2.0 version is a no-op though. Ryan __ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: mod_random_chunk
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you remove the "#define HTTPD_TEST_REQUIRE_APACHE 2" from
> mod_random_chunk.c then it compiles and runs successfully but does not
> pass the tests. It seems that it is not sending any headers: should it
> be?
it would need to call ap_send_http_header(r); #ifdef APACHE1
and also notice this, not sure if it matters at all...
else if (len == 0) {
/* 1.x version used to do this; but chunk_filter does now */
#if 0
ap_bsetflag(r->connection->client, B_CHUNK, 0);
ap_bsetflag(r->connection->client, B_CHUNK, 1);
#endif
}
Re: Perl tests and server start
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > I noticed yesterday that three servers are started > even if the tests requested don't need 'em. That is, > a server is started for mod_headers and mod_vhost_alias > even if I ask for only a single test sequence that > doesn't include those. those are just vhosts. what is the problem?
Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestServer.pm
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > dougm 01/10/20 11:01:32 > > > > Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestServer.pm > > Log: > > make sure only 1 process is started for win32; else Kill will only > > shutdown the parent > > > doesn't it contradict with being able to override maxclients? So if a > certain test relies on the fact that it needs 2 servers at the same > time, this will hang. no. win32 and all mpms aside from prefork can handle concurrent requests > 1 with -DONE_PROCESS
