Re: 2.0.28 results, need interpretation
Doug MacEachern wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > The limits failure has to with LimitRequestBody, and looks > > to be a known issue (see modules/http/http_protocol.c:1314, > > "/* XXX shouldn't we enforce this for chunked encoding too? */"). > > But you probably already knew this. :) > > ken told me he wasn't surprised that test is failing with 2.0, > but didn't say why. The test is correctly identifying the fact that the Apache code is broken. See the recent discussions about LimitRequest* on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I'm not currently in a position to look into it more closely. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
Re: 2.0.28 results, need interpretation
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:34:35AM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote: > this is fixed now. Works great, thanks. -aaron
Re: 2.0.28 results, need interpretation
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote: > The limits failure has to with LimitRequestBody, and looks to be a known > issue (see modules/http/http_protocol.c:1314, "/* XXX shouldn't we enforce > this for chunked encoding too? */"). But you probably already knew this. :) ken told me he wasn't surprised that test is failing with 2.0, but didn't say why. > As for the cgi error, is this the error that Cliff reported earlier? It > looks like it's a simple error with how @CGI_MODULE@ is being replaced > in t/conf/extra.conf.in on about line 175. In my setup, no matter what > I do it gets replaced with mod_cgi.c, which means those directives are > never included with worker's mod_cgid.c. Can someone with more experience > with perl voodoo check this out and let me know what I'm doing wrong here? this is fixed now.
2.0.28 results, need interpretation
I'm fairly new to the perl-framework testing harness, and I'm getting some results I'm not sure how to interpret on my Solaris 8 build of the rolled 2.0.28 tarball. With the worker MPM (with --enable-cgid) I get: Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed apache/limits.t 101 10.00% 9 modules/cgi.t 36 33 91.67% 1-4, 6, 8-27, 29-36 But on prefork with the same build parameters (s/cgid/cgi of course) I get only: Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed apache/limits.t 101 10.00% 9 The limits failure has to with LimitRequestBody, and looks to be a known issue (see modules/http/http_protocol.c:1314, "/* XXX shouldn't we enforce this for chunked encoding too? */"). But you probably already knew this. :) As for the cgi error, is this the error that Cliff reported earlier? It looks like it's a simple error with how @CGI_MODULE@ is being replaced in t/conf/extra.conf.in on about line 175. In my setup, no matter what I do it gets replaced with mod_cgi.c, which means those directives are never included with worker's mod_cgid.c. Can someone with more experience with perl voodoo check this out and let me know what I'm doing wrong here? -aaron p.s. Solaris 8 intel (07/'01 update), perl 5.6.1
