Re: make failed with 20021225 beta
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: make failed with 20021225 beta Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 17:43:49 +0100 > > > http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure > > > > It seemed the above file was a bit broken, it contained > > many wrong , for example, line #47 > > No, really. It must be your download utility or whatever. Have you > tried > wget http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure Oops, you are right. I used lynx but pushed wrong key (print but not download). Now I could get correct configure file. Very sorry to disturb you. Best regards, 2002.12.27(Fri) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Re: make failed with 20021225 beta
> > http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure > > It seemed the above file was a bit broken, it contained > many wrong , for example, line #47 No, really. It must be your download utility or whatever. Have you tried wget http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure Thomas
Re: make failed with 20021225 beta
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: make failed with 20021225 beta Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 09:30:50 +0100 > A possible fix is to invoke AC_PROG_CPP in texk/dvipdfm/configure.in > after AC_PROG_CC. If you have autoconf-1.13 installed, then you > can update your configure script by > cd texk/dvipdfm; autoconf -m ../etc/autoconf I see, thanks for your advice. > I just have put a fixed texk/dvipdfm/configure script at > http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure It seemed the above file was a bit broken, it contained many wrong , for example, line #47 Specify directory where the png library (libpng.a) re sides." should be Specify directory where the png library (libpng.a) resides." After fixing these, it worked fine and compilation went fine. Best regards, 2002.12.27(Fri) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Re: make failed with 20021225 beta
> sortid.c: In function `sort_idx': > sortid.c:53: `LC_COLLATE' undeclared (first use in this function) > sortid.c:53: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ... Willem Jan Palenstijn has found the reason for this and submitted a patch: From what I can tell, it's caused by checks for libz and the C preprocessor conflicting with eachother in texk/dvipdfm. The check for libz sets CPP to a temp value, and then starts the preprocessor check, which then writes the (very broken) temp value to the config.cache, which causes the locale.h check to break in texk/makeindexk/configure. ... A possible fix is to invoke AC_PROG_CPP in texk/dvipdfm/configure.in after AC_PROG_CC. If you have autoconf-1.13 installed, then you can update your configure script by cd texk/dvipdfm; autoconf -m ../etc/autoconf I just have put a fixed texk/dvipdfm/configure script at http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/configure Another possible workaround is to omit --with-system-zlib. > I'm not sure this is a bug or a problem of my system > but I hope this will help anyway. No, it is not a bug os your system. Thomas
make failed with 20021225 beta
Hi, I tried to compile teTeX-src-beta-20021225.tar.gz and got the following error; make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kohda/misc/pack/teTeX/tetex-bin-1.0.7+20021225/texk/makeindexk' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c genind.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c mkind.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c qsort.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c scanid.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c scanst.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -c sortid.c sortid.c: In function `sort_idx': sortid.c:53: `LC_COLLATE' undeclared (first use in this function) sortid.c:53: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sortid.c:53: for each function it appears in.) sortid.c:53: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast make[3]: *** [sortid.o] error 1 System is Debian GNU/Linux and gcc --version 2.95.4 glibc 2.3.1, further, 20021223 beta was compiled successfully under the same system. I'm not sure this is a bug or a problem of my system but I hope this will help anyway. Best regards, 2002.12.26(Thu) -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima