[Texascavers] Blue Grotto Springs
Blue Grotto Springs in FL in 2/7/2004. http://www.mflan.com/temp/blue_grotto_springs1.jpg http://www.mflan.com/temp/blue_grotto_springs2.jpg http://www.mflan.com/temp/blue_grotto_springs3.jpg http://terraserverusa.com/map.aspx?t=2s=12lon=-82.48694lat=29.38750opt=1 http://tinyurl.com/4vp5ss No particular reason - just pretty pics. Mike Flannigan - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
[Texascavers] photo
It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] photo
I am!! On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Nancy Weaver nan...@io.com wrote: It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] photo
At least for me, I just want to know how the hell he did it so I can reproduce it. Short of finding the photographer to ask dissecting it is probably the next step. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Nancy Weaver nan...@io.com wrote: It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] photo
I too am interested in how it was created and if it was photoshopped- not to discredit any art involved, but to ease my mind. There is no way, at any film iso speed that my camera can operate at anyhow, that I could that much light from the Milky Way into my sensor without getting motion streaking. A confirmation that it was photoshopped, would satiate the itch to buy a better camera. :) On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Joe Ranzau jran...@gmail.com wrote: At least for me, I just want to know how the hell he did it so I can reproduce it. Short of finding the photographer to ask dissecting it is probably the next step. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Nancy Weaver nan...@io.com wrote: It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
RE: [Texascavers] photo
While it seems to be a beautiful photo I'm not actually enjoying it coz it looks false... -Original Message- From: Nancy Weaver [mailto:nan...@io.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:52 PM To: Texascavers@texascavers.com Subject: [Texascavers] photo It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
Re: [Texascavers] photo
It stated that it was done in one exposure. Hmm... I guess that doesn't rule out one exposure - doctored. I'd accept that it was extremely fast film or hypersensitive superconductive-chilled sensor or something. But like Stephan said - it's hard to swallow. It looks a bit unnatural. . -WaV On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Brian Riordan riordan.br...@gmail.comwrote: I too am interested in how it was created and if it was photoshopped- not to discredit any art involved, but to ease my mind. There is no way, at any film iso speed that my camera can operate at anyhow, that I could that much light from the Milky Way into my sensor without getting motion streaking. A confirmation that it was photoshopped, would satiate the itch to buy a better camera. :) On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Joe Ranzau jran...@gmail.com wrote: At least for me, I just want to know how the hell he did it so I can reproduce it. Short of finding the photographer to ask dissecting it is probably the next step. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Nancy Weaver nan...@io.com wrote: It seems so sad to me that such a drop dead gorgeous photo should be dissected in terms of how it was taken. Is anyone just enjoying it? - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com
