Re: [Texascavers] WNS money

2010-07-24 Thread Andy Gluesenkamp
Bill,
  I can always count on you for a cynical and clueless rant about conservation 
and endangered species.  The whole endangered species biologists are involved 
in a money-making scheme is my favorite.  Look at their shoes, Bill.  Those 
people ain't got no money.

Andy

Andrew G. Gluesenkamp, Ph.D.

700 Billie Brooks Drive

Driftwood, Texas 78619

(512) 799-1095

a...@gluesenkamp.com

--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:

From: Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
Subject: [Texascavers] WNS money
To: Cavers Texas texascavers@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Friday, July 23, 2010, 6:48 PM

In my view, tax dollars for WNS research is just special-interest pork for WNS 
scientists and their assistants. What, realistically, might be discovered that 
is actually useful to _bats_, not just a few people's wallets? Hard to 
absolutely prove nothing, but I wouldn't bet a nickel of my own money on it. 
Read Tom Aley's article in the February NSS News about possible WNS management 
strategies. Aley does recommend more research, but then he has to--he's a 
member of the scientists' union.

If you do write, don't just copy that letter. Most congressmen aren't stupid, 
despite all appearances to the contrary, and they spot a letter-writing 
campaign for what it's worth. -- Mixon

May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrials of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com



Re: [Texascavers] WNS money

2010-07-24 Thread JerryAtkin
 
Probably somewhere in the middle of these two opposing views lies the  
truth. While there have been some notable examples of endangered species 
studies 
 that were extremely self-serving, the potential impact of WNS on bats and  
other related members of the cave ecosystem are extraordinarily  severe.  
Given the gravity of the situation, I favor funding responsible  research 
agencies that may help in future, if not the present, species die-offs.  It may 
be too late to save the bats from WNS, but learning how to contain and  
manage future pandemics has potential payoffs that are far reaching.
 
Jerry.
 
 In a message dated 7/24/2010 7:23:43 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
andrew_gluesenk...@yahoo.com writes:

Bill,
I can always count on you for a cynical and clueless  rant about 
conservation and endangered species.  The whole endangered  species biologists 
are 
involved in a money-making scheme is my  favorite.  Look at their shoes, 
Bill.  Those people ain't got no  money.

Andy

Andrew G. Gluesenkamp, Ph.D.
700 Billie Brooks  Drive
Driftwood, Texas 78619
(512)  799-1095
a...@gluesenkamp.com

--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Mixon Bill  bmixon...@austin.rr.com wrote:


From:  Mixon Bill bmixon...@austin.rr.com
Subject: [Texascavers] WNS  money
To: Cavers Texas texascavers@texascavers.com
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date:  Friday, July 23, 2010, 6:48 PM

In my view, tax dollars for WNS research is just  special-interest pork for 
WNS scientists and their assistants. What,  realistically, might be 
discovered that is actually useful to _bats_, not  just a few people's wallets? 
Hard to absolutely prove nothing, but I  wouldn't bet a nickel of my own 
money on it. Read Tom Aley's article in the  February NSS News about possible 
WNS management strategies. Aley does  recommend more research, but then he has 
to--he's a member of the  scientists' union.

If you do write, don't just copy that letter. Most  congressmen aren't 
stupid, despite all appearances to the contrary, and they  spot a 
letter-writing 
campaign for what it's worth. --  Mixon







[Texascavers] WNS money

2010-07-23 Thread Mixon Bill
In my view, tax dollars for WNS research is just special-interest pork  
for WNS scientists and their assistants. What, realistically, might  
be discovered that is actually useful to _bats_, not just a few  
people's wallets? Hard to absolutely prove nothing, but I wouldn't bet  
a nickel of my own money on it. Read Tom Aley's article in the  
February NSS News about possible WNS management strategies. Aley does  
recommend more research, but then he has to--he's a member of the  
scientists' union.


If you do write, don't just copy that letter. Most congressmen aren't  
stupid, despite all appearances to the contrary, and they spot a  
letter-writing campaign for what it's worth. -- Mixon


May the last lawyer be strangled with the entrials of the last priest.

You may reply to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: bmi...@alumni.uchicago.edu
AMCS: edi...@amcs-pubs.org or sa...@amcs-pubs.org


-
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com