Re: TexasCavers options

[wokka]

That's great news.  I'm assuming it will send out a daily to you around
midnite (server of course is central time), so let me know how it works
over the next few days.

Thanks

>>please give me feedback
>
> Works great!  I just got a consolidated resend of all traffic since 25
> Feb.  Nicer than usual format, too.  I can just page through and read
> them all quickly and easily.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Alex Sproul, NSS 8086RL/FE
> 5715 Lee-Jackson Hwy, Greenville VA 24440
> 540-377-6364
>
>

Re: TexasCavers options

[wokka]

Alex, you are set, you shouldn't receive anymore emails from the list,
until the digest runs (I've never actually tested this, please give me
feedback).

Thanks

>>If you like, I can set this.
>
> Yes, please do set digest.
>
> I could quarantine list mails to a subfolder, but then they'd never get
> read!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> --
> Alex Sproul, NSS 8086RL/FE
> 5715 Lee-Jackson Hwy, Greenville VA 24440
> 540-377-6364
>
>

Re: TexasCavers options

[Charles "wokka" Goldsmith]

Hi Alex, digesting is available, but for whatever reason, I have to set 
it from the admin console, a user can't subscribe as digest.  If you 
like, I can set this.  I have never tested it (I prefer to have rules 
place the emails into a sub-folder as they come in).  If you would like 
to try this, let me know and I'll adjust your email address.


Thanks for the input!
Charles

Alex Sproul wrote:

Hi, Charlie --

Let me add my thanks for keeping this list going.

I have a question, which doesn't seem to be answered by anything I 
can get from the listserv.  Is digesting available?  This list is more 
active than any other I know of, and it's really crowding my mailbox.  
A single daily digest would really be nice.


And let me add my $.02 to the reply issue.  My take on this 
convention is that when you click reply to a list message, it should 
be assumed you are replying to the list.  If you want to reply 
privately, just click on the person's address.  What could be more 
logical than that?  If the reverse were true, many conversations 
would continue on off-list (inadvertently or otherwise), and 
everybody would lose...


Cheers,

Alex