[Therion] Combining caves using different co-ordinate systems
I had put one cave using a cs and gps fix coordinates into one survey block in a .th file. Then a second cave using a different cs and gps fix coordinates in a second .th file. My project then uses a master.th file which inputs both of these. If I run my config on either of the individual files then they appear at the correct place on Google Earth from an output kml file. If I include both caves then they appear in different places. The one I include first is in the correct place. If I swap the order they appear in the master.th file then this confirms the first one is alway put in the correct place, and the second is positioned using the cs of the first one. The same in a lox model file (except I cannot confirm which is correct, but I see them in different places when I give them the same entrance location to test this). Footleg On 19 Sep 2014 14:33, "Andrew Atkinson" wrote: > You can use cs in config file, either inside layout, or outside layout > (most likely what you want to do) to control the output co-ordinate system, > which I think is what you are trying to do? > > Andrew > On 19 Sep 2014 14:00, "Footleg" wrote: > >> I have been converting a project from an old datum to a more recent >> one following the issuing of new maps using the newer datum. So all my >> entrance GPS coordinates changed. I updated the cs statements in my >> survey data files and my KML output is still in the correct place. So >> all was looking good. Then I discovered that if I include a survey in >> the old cs with one using the new cs then Therion appears to treat >> both caves as having the same cs. Whichever cs is used by the first >> included cave is applied to subsequent caves too. Is there a way to >> deal with this? >> >> Footleg >> ___ >> Therion mailing list >> Therion at speleo.sk >> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion >> > > ___ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140919/c33ac1b7/attachment.html>
[Therion] Combining caves using different co-ordinate systems
You can use cs in config file, either inside layout, or outside layout (most likely what you want to do) to control the output co-ordinate system, which I think is what you are trying to do? Andrew On 19 Sep 2014 14:00, "Footleg" wrote: > I have been converting a project from an old datum to a more recent > one following the issuing of new maps using the newer datum. So all my > entrance GPS coordinates changed. I updated the cs statements in my > survey data files and my KML output is still in the correct place. So > all was looking good. Then I discovered that if I include a survey in > the old cs with one using the new cs then Therion appears to treat > both caves as having the same cs. Whichever cs is used by the first > included cave is applied to subsequent caves too. Is there a way to > deal with this? > > Footleg > ___ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140919/cc97c322/attachment.html>
[Therion] Combining caves using different co-ordinate systems
I have been converting a project from an old datum to a more recent one following the issuing of new maps using the newer datum. So all my entrance GPS coordinates changed. I updated the cs statements in my survey data files and my KML output is still in the correct place. So all was looking good. Then I discovered that if I include a survey in the old cs with one using the new cs then Therion appears to treat both caves as having the same cs. Whichever cs is used by the first included cave is applied to subsequent caves too. Is there a way to deal with this? Footleg
[Therion] offsets and colour by map
Okay I can see how this behaviour would also be useful, however not always so it would be good to have an option of making the outline extend the boundaries something like OffShootM at OffShoot [0 -25 m] above -page-boundaries on please may I add that or equivalent, to the wish list Andrew On 12/09/14 07:44, Bruce wrote: > Probably more an unexpected use, that an offset passage would not be bounded > by passages that are not offset, I think this was probably intentional. The > way I use the corollary of this feature, preview, is to display nearby, > overlaying and underlying passages for a distinct map that is the primary > focus of the output. I definitely do not want the preview 'shadows' to > cause Therion to extend the map or atlas boundaries. Would cause me all > sorts of trouble.
