Re: [Thunar-dev] GVfs

2008-06-21 Thread Stephan Arts
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Benedikt Meurer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erlend Davidson wrote:
>> Are there any plans to implement GVfs in Thunar?
>
> Yes. But that will require quite a lot of rewrites and time is always
> against us.

Can't you fix that first? - Here is the bugreport:

http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3645

-
Stephan
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev


Re: [Thunar-dev] GVfs

2008-06-21 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Erlend Davidson wrote:
> Are there any plans to implement GVfs in Thunar?

Yes. But that will require quite a lot of rewrites and time is always
against us.

Benedikt
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev


Re: [Thunar-dev] GVfs

2008-06-20 Thread Nick Schermer
Benny said in the gsoc discussion on xfce4-dev:

> Thunar will use GIO/GVfs, as everything else simply doesn't make sense,
> and would be useless duplication of efforts.

Of course this is a lot of work, but I guess if someone really wants
to work on this,
a branch could be created to start with this...

Nick

2008/6/20 Erlend Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are there any plans to implement GVfs in Thunar?
> ___
> Thunar-dev mailing list
> Thunar-dev@xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
>
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev


[Thunar-dev] GVfs

2008-06-20 Thread Erlend Davidson
Are there any plans to implement GVfs in Thunar?
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev