[tw] Re: Creating TiddlyWiki
Thank you for your response; I wasn't very clear. In fact I wanted use TW as some sort of documentation tool, by creating an initial HTML file with some tiddlers, for example with the use of a template and some code in order to generate an intitial HTML file. I found something that goes in that sense here: https://gist.github.com/745113 with the use of an XSLT file. So I got my response: I can "inject" tiddlers in the tag *div *that has the id *storeArea*. Now I ask me, how I can made the document read only. Bertrand ;-) Le samedi 3 mars 2012 17:20:12 UTC+1, PMario a écrit : > > Hi Bertrand, > How do you create your documentation? TW or external source? > Should your TW be editable for users afterwards, or is it readOnly? > > Can you describe your usecase a bit closer? > -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/ENYLfsST4dIJ. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
Re: [tw] Re: Full TiddlyWiki Encryption
Yeah, I looked at boxcrypto, it does require admin, in winxp, and it doesn't even support uac yet, so it has to be disabled. I have a feeling I would have to write my own FF plugin, but I have no idea how to. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:59 AM, PMario wrote: > On Mar 5, 9:14 am, Steve Rutter wrote: > > The problem is that none of those solutions are portable. And the > portable > > solutions require me to have to manually encrypt the file and copy over > the > > file in my dropbox. > IMO this is not true. I'm referring to "EncFS works on Linux as well > as Mac through macfuse or Windows using BoxCryptor." in the link > above. > > I don't use BoxCryptor, but it seems to be a "system level driver" > that gives you access, to transparent, file by file encryption on the > fly. So you just open your TW from the folder. If you save it, > encryption is done automatically. If you need to decrypt the data on a > linux or mac system you can use the "native" EncFS drivers, which > basically do the same. There are some howto's at the BoxCryptors page. > > If you are not allowed to install software like this at your work > computer, than you have a problem. > > You'll need to go with a plugin solution. > > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Full TiddlyWiki Encryption
On Mar 5, 9:14 am, Steve Rutter wrote: > The problem is that none of those solutions are portable. And the portable > solutions require me to have to manually encrypt the file and copy over the > file in my dropbox. IMO this is not true. I'm referring to "EncFS works on Linux as well as Mac through macfuse or Windows using BoxCryptor." in the link above. I don't use BoxCryptor, but it seems to be a "system level driver" that gives you access, to transparent, file by file encryption on the fly. So you just open your TW from the folder. If you save it, encryption is done automatically. If you need to decrypt the data on a linux or mac system you can use the "native" EncFS drivers, which basically do the same. There are some howto's at the BoxCryptors page. If you are not allowed to install software like this at your work computer, than you have a problem. You'll need to go with a plugin solution. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Another browser to add to the "it works" list: luakit!
Not much to setup - unless you mean my tweaked rc file. My changes are just deleting unused bits from the default rc, with one small block added for the xdg-open. For regular use, a generic luakit install works out of the box... if it's available for your platform, that is. But, because I love TW so much... here you go: https://github.com/perlguy/luakit-tiddlywiki On Mar 2, 3:08 am, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > Awesome, and congratulations. There's nothing like the exhilaration of > something working unexpectedly. I hadn't come across Luakit, not being > a Linux user, but it seems like a great fit for TiddlyWiki. > > Is there something I can link to from tiddlywiki.com - maybe it would > be worth setting up a github repo with all the bits and pieces? > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:14 AM, perlguy wrote: > > Ah... here's a couple of screenshots if you're thinking of trying it > > out: > > > my somewhat visually tweaked, lots of plugins version: > >http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45371072/tiddlywiki-luakit.png > > > vanilla "empty.html" from "empty.zip" downloaded and opened with > > regular luakit > > configuration:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/45371072/tiddlywiki-luakit-empty.png > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "TiddlyWiki" group. > > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Full TiddlyWiki Encryption
Apologies - on windows, even portable mode requires admin rights to get the device driver itself loaded, which I think disqualifies it under your conditions... On Mar 5, 6:52 am, perlguy wrote: > Have you looked at truecrypt?http://www.truecrypt.org/ > > There's even a portable mode (with > caveats)http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=truecrypt-portable > > On Mar 5, 12:14 am, Steve Rutter wrote: > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Full TiddlyWiki Encryption
Have you looked at truecrypt? http://www.truecrypt.org/ There's even a portable mode (with caveats) http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=truecrypt-portable On Mar 5, 12:14 am, Steve Rutter wrote: > The problem is that none of those solutions are portable. And the portable > solutions require me to have to manually encrypt the file and copy over the > file in my dropbox. The problem with this is that, inevitably, I have to > unencrypt the file to disk, and then have FF open it. What would be nice is > to have a FF extension that could see an encrypted file, discern the > encryption scheme from from a line of xml and then ask for the password to > decrypt before displaying it. > > I know how to keep my data safe in DB, but nearly all of those use admin > rights. I want to use the same wiki at work, where I don't have those > rights, and cannot have support install them. While I'm not entirely > concerned with touching my workstation disk, I don't want to accidentally > forget to re-encrypt and upload the new file. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:56 PM, PMario wrote: > > I'd use a system like described here. > > Makes it possible to use any type of encrypted files with Linux, Mac > > an Win systems. > > >http://www.webupd8.org/2011/06/encrypt-your-private-dropbox-data-with... > > > On Mar 4, 7:45 pm, bluespire wrote: > > >... This, if you ask me, should be even easier that > > > individual tiddlers. > > Yes it is. > > > > ... but I'm not even interested at this > > > point in THAT much security. > > I'm pretty sure, you need to take care of the browsers cach. Otherwise > > I don't see any reason, to encrypt the stuff at all. If you just don't > > want to send plain text to Dropbox I'd have a look at the link above. > > > -m > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "TiddlyWiki" group. > > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Another browser to add to the "it works" list: luakit!
I dont see any reason is woulnd't be able to run on OS X... though you may be right - getting a supported GTk+ to compile it against might be troublesome. I don't have a Mac or I'd gladly give it a shot. Luakit does indeed use the same webkit that Chrome and Safari use... and unless you just want a minimal wrapper around webkit, you're probably better off using one of those two instead. On Mar 2, 12:20 pm, Eric Weir wrote: > On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Måns wrote: > > >> Will it run in OS X? > > > A comment: > >http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1947036 > > > I guess you'll have to use Linux ... > > Thanks, Måns. Interesting. At the luakit page on github it is described as "a > fast, light and simple to use micro-browser framework exensible by Lua using > the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit." > > Googling "webkit" the first item describes it thus: "WebKit is an open source > web browser engine. WebKit is also the name of the Mac OS X system framework > version of the engine that's used by Safari, Dashboard, Mail, and many other > OS X applications." > > If it is indeed a problem on OS X, must be GTK+? The GTK+ website describes > it as "a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces." > Responding to the question, Where can it be used, it says, "Everywhere!" > > Pretty certain it's all beyond me, though. Wouldn't have a clue how to go > about any of this. And with webkit originating in OS X I wouldn't be > surprised if it turned out not to solve my apparently OS X-related TiddlyWiki > problems. > > Thanks again, > -- > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA > eew...@bellsouth.net > > "What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" > > - Mary Oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
[tw] Re: Grounded Theory Coding
Sorry after i have finisht my master thesis i want to get into JAvaskript and Tiddly, but now i dont have time for that. Can anybody programm, what i have asked for ;) : tagging of parts of tiddlers, and seeing all tagged parts under the tiddler with the title of that tag. also that both are syncronised. On 29 Feb., 10:05, Alex Hough wrote: > Perhaps we could think of the required outputs. > > | Code | Phrase | Contained in Tiddler |h > | #description | "few leaves on his flowers" | [[Neatness in Gardens]] | > | #emotion | "he was delighted" | [[Neatness in Gardens]] | > | table showing coded phrases and locations|c > > ... then work out a how to produce the table > > 1) go to the tiddler store > 2) find any tiddler that has any text surrounded by double single > brackets and followed by a hash and put them into an array > 3) output table > > I think the Javascript RegEx Object might come in handy... > > ALex > > [1]http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_regexp.asp > > On 29 February 2012 03:04, Niklas Wagner wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Better to use the term "tagging" content then so it's clear in this > >> context. > > > very good, but what i mean is not tagging of tiddlers but tagging of > > parts of tiddlers. > > >> What I do is break a longer text down into smaller chunks, what I call > >> "nodes", in such a way that it's easy to view the whole work in sequential, > >> section/chapter whatever order. > >> However because the nodes are now individual tiddlers, they can also be > >> "assembled for viewing" according to other criteria, including your topic > >> tags. > > > Ho do you view it then in sequential order? > > > i think the problem with that is that certain parts of an text have at > > the same time different interlocking tags: > > > Niklas: in my interviews on "Neatness in Gardens" I have a tag > > "Snail", I want to mark all sections of in the transcripts with this > > tag. > > Alex: ((Alex's garden was looking very neat. There were ((few leaves > > on his > > flowers))#description and ((he was delighted))#emotion. > > Niklas: Alex, Do you like Snails? I mean they ate all the leaves of > > the your flowers.))#Snails > > > perhaps the solution would look like something like the preview of the > >http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/#YourSearchPlugin > > > but what you could fill in a tiddler and define exactly with (()) what > > should be displayed. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "TiddlyWiki" group. > > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
Re: [tw] Re: Full TiddlyWiki Encryption
The problem is that none of those solutions are portable. And the portable solutions require me to have to manually encrypt the file and copy over the file in my dropbox. The problem with this is that, inevitably, I have to unencrypt the file to disk, and then have FF open it. What would be nice is to have a FF extension that could see an encrypted file, discern the encryption scheme from from a line of xml and then ask for the password to decrypt before displaying it. I know how to keep my data safe in DB, but nearly all of those use admin rights. I want to use the same wiki at work, where I don't have those rights, and cannot have support install them. While I'm not entirely concerned with touching my workstation disk, I don't want to accidentally forget to re-encrypt and upload the new file. On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:56 PM, PMario wrote: > I'd use a system like described here. > Makes it possible to use any type of encrypted files with Linux, Mac > an Win systems. > > http://www.webupd8.org/2011/06/encrypt-your-private-dropbox-data-with.html > > On Mar 4, 7:45 pm, bluespire wrote: > >... This, if you ask me, should be even easier that > > individual tiddlers. > Yes it is. > > > ... but I'm not even interested at this > > point in THAT much security. > I'm pretty sure, you need to take care of the browsers cach. Otherwise > I don't see any reason, to encrypt the stuff at all. If you just don't > want to send plain text to Dropbox I'd have a look at the link above. > > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
