[tw5] Re: [TW5] smallest possible tiddlywiki?

[leoperbo]

Just for the people landindg here searching for a "tiny" TiddlyWiki", there 
is *FeatherWiki*, described by Robbie Antenesse 
 (creator) "to be just like TiddlyWiki 
, but with the smallest file size possible". It is 
50 times smaller than an empty TiddlyWiki, and it's compatible with 
Tiddlyhost.

I made use of FeatherWiki to create an "eCard" named "TiddlyCard", that 
made distributed verification possible between Mastodon and a wiki 
published in Tiddlyhost.

https://feather.wiki/
https://github.com/simonbaird/tiddlyhost/wiki/FAQ#what-is-feather-wiki
https://leoperbo.tiddlyhost.com/
https://mstdn.mx/@leoperbo/109356422428292257
El martes, 13 de mayo de 2014 a las 4:01:15 UTC-5, PMario escribió:

> On Monday, May 12, 2014 6:42:36 AM UTC+2, RunningUtes wrote:
>>
>> Just wondering if anyone had tried to strip out anything to make a TW5 as 
>> small as possible say for read only display of information.
>
>
> Are you talking about a downloaded empty.html or  a downloaded version of 
> tiddlywiki.com?
>
> TW.com contains all translated interface languages. So your users may need 
> only one or 2 of them. 
>
> As mentioned already, you can create 
>
> * as single file, that contains a static version of all tiddlers. No 
> javascript ... should work with all browsers.
> * many static files, that contain single tiddlers. No javascript ... 
> should work with all browsers.
>
> or 
>
> * if you want TW functionality (eg: search), you could compress the 
> javascript source code, to get a smaller file size. 
>
> IMO at the moment it doesn't make sense to compress the core js code. ... 
> I doubt it ever will. 
>
> reasons:
>
> * A well designed server will send a compressed version over the wire, to 
> the browser. So web traffic will be less, than the actual file size.
>* 621kByte sent 2100kByte file size  ... tiddlywiki.com.html
>* 187kByte sent 892kByte file size ... empty.html
>
> * In my opinion, the advantage to have readable source code, outweights 
> the win of less disk space.
> * Many users include images into there TWs. So if you include one image 
> with about 300kbyte, the "compressed javascript" file size advantage is 
> gone. 
> * Harddisk space is cheap.
> * Maintaining a compressed TW is not cheap. 
>
> just my 2 cents
> -mario
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ab846931-9af1-4022-a8a6-0820a1121d46n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] An example: sharing specific content via custom view

[Charlie Veniot]

So sharing a specific tiddler so that it looks a little bit like a static 
representation of the tiddler, yet is fully dynamic.

Because it is the full TiddlyWiki, just readjusted to show the TiddlyWiki 
in a very adjusted view.

Click on this link 
,
 
which is
```
https://basicanywheremachine.neocities.org/BAM_IDE.html?target=Test%20Numeral%20Representation%20and%20Conversion#View%20Program
```

Notice the little "RUN" button in the title of the detail element (next to 
that drop-down button).  Click that button to run the program in a separate 
window.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0a15dadc-13d1-4f7c-94e5-694fea26fde9n%40googlegroups.com.