While Wagn is a nice addition to the WikiWorld, TW still has a major
advantage; it's dependencies are found on many machines and multiple
OS's, making TW much more portable than Wagn. I carry my TW's on a
USB drive, allowing me to access them from almost any machine.
On Jun 12, 7:35 am, Måns wrote:
> Sorry - I forgot to post the address:http://wagn.org
>
> On 12 Jun., 13:34, Måns wrote:
>
> > Hi TwWizards..
>
> > I just discovered Wagn - a new wikiengine - wiki on wheels. (Ruby on
> > rails)
> > It looks and behaves very much like TiddlyWiki, and I wonder if you
> > couldn't just replace their "cards" with tiddlers in some sense?
>
> > It looks very promising - and I think it deserves a close look, when
> > thinking of setting up a multiuser TiddlyWiki-like engine... As I
> > understand it's opensource - and uses Ruby as framework for the
> > servercomponents... "needs: ruby (1.8.4 or 1.8.6) and either Postgres
> > or Mysql"
>
> > regards Måns Mårtensson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---