[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-13 Thread BJ
This is now fixed.

There is a new ''tidsub" filter -
example:


[plugintidsub[TiddlerName]fields[]]

all the best

BJ



On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:04:46 PM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> If I replace "fields[]" with "tags[]" in your example, I get the 
> override's tags. Is "fields[]" the only possible filter following 
> "plugin[]title[]"?
>
> Not complaining nor requesting anything, just want to know what's 
> possible, and it's not apparent to me from the source code. Thanks!
>
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:38:30 AM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> I've put it here:
>>
>> http://bjhacks.tiddlyspot.com/
>>
>> enjoy!
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:51:33 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> So, you have an operator "plugin", that replaces the overriding tiddler 
>>> with the original shadow tiddler, for the scope of the filter run??? This 
>>> belongs in the core! Please do share. Thanks. :)
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 4:36:48 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:

 I dont think there is a way to do that.

 I have an extension that I use for this it has the syntax:

 <$set name="plugintiddler" value="$:/plugins/bj/struc">
 <$list filter = 
 "[plugintitle[$:/plugins/bj/struc/license]fields[]]">

 <$view tiddler=<> 
 subtiddler="$:/plugins/bj/struc/license" field=<> 
 format="text"/> 
 
 



 I could share it if you like...



 On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:49:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I'm doing. That's how I can display any field if I 
> know it's name. I can transclude it using the subtiddler option and the 
> field option. I'm looking for the next step - to display all the fields, 
> without knowing their names. With a standard tiddler, I would use a 
> fields[] filter operator for that. But there is no way to do it for a 
> subtiddler.
>
> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:00:29 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget
>>
>> BJ
>>
>> On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> Not see for myself, but *display*.
>>>
>>> I already got to the point where I can display each field of the 
>>> original by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is a filter to list 
>>> all 
>>> fields of the tiddler that is inside `[shadowsource[]]`. 
>>>
>>> -R.
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 4:51:12 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote:

 On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the 
> original shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's 
> fields?
>

 Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  
 back and forth. 

 -m

>>>
>>>
>
>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/456ea18d-d09d-4045-afe4-49eb5eb0a079%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-07 Thread wimm
did you have a look at?
<$view tiddler="title" subtiddler="tiddlertitle" field="tags"/>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2c882e92-0afa-4d45-a05c-f4b236e8236b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-06 Thread TonyM
My 2cents

You want to override the override of a shadow tiddler to access its fields?

What about cloning the shadow tiddler with a new name (remove and tags that 
make it active) and use that copy to identify the list of fields in it, 
which will match those in the original shadow tiddler. You can then use 
this information to reference the actual fields in the shadow tiddler?

Just a different approach, and a variation on Marios "Just rename the "new" 
tiddler and the shadow will come back.  back and forth. "

Regards
Tony

On Saturday, 2 September 2017 09:09:48 UTC+10, Rustem wrote:
>
>
> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the original 
> shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's fields?
>
> --R.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cffe86e2-ccc9-43f8-8a4b-961065c988db%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-06 Thread BJ
unfortunately it does not work! The filter is pulling the unshadow tiddler 
out or the store.

On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:04:46 PM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> If I replace "fields[]" with "tags[]" in your example, I get the 
> override's tags. Is "fields[]" the only possible filter following 
> "plugin[]title[]"?
>
> Not complaining nor requesting anything, just want to know what's 
> possible, and it's not apparent to me from the source code. Thanks!
>
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:38:30 AM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> I've put it here:
>>
>> http://bjhacks.tiddlyspot.com/
>>
>> enjoy!
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:51:33 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> So, you have an operator "plugin", that replaces the overriding tiddler 
>>> with the original shadow tiddler, for the scope of the filter run??? This 
>>> belongs in the core! Please do share. Thanks. :)
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 4:36:48 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:

 I dont think there is a way to do that.

 I have an extension that I use for this it has the syntax:

 <$set name="plugintiddler" value="$:/plugins/bj/struc">
 <$list filter = 
 "[plugintitle[$:/plugins/bj/struc/license]fields[]]">

 <$view tiddler=<> 
 subtiddler="$:/plugins/bj/struc/license" field=<> 
 format="text"/> 
 
 



 I could share it if you like...



 On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:49:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I'm doing. That's how I can display any field if I 
> know it's name. I can transclude it using the subtiddler option and the 
> field option. I'm looking for the next step - to display all the fields, 
> without knowing their names. With a standard tiddler, I would use a 
> fields[] filter operator for that. But there is no way to do it for a 
> subtiddler.
>
> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:00:29 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget
>>
>> BJ
>>
>> On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> Not see for myself, but *display*.
>>>
>>> I already got to the point where I can display each field of the 
>>> original by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is a filter to list 
>>> all 
>>> fields of the tiddler that is inside `[shadowsource[]]`. 
>>>
>>> -R.
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 4:51:12 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote:

 On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the 
> original shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's 
> fields?
>

 Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  
 back and forth. 

 -m

>>>
>>>
>
>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d1785a7c-b426-4266-8416-897eb38efae7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-05 Thread BJ
I've put it here:

http://bjhacks.tiddlyspot.com/

enjoy!

On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:51:33 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> So, you have an operator "plugin", that replaces the overriding tiddler 
> with the original shadow tiddler, for the scope of the filter run??? This 
> belongs in the core! Please do share. Thanks. :)
>
> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 4:36:48 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> I dont think there is a way to do that.
>>
>> I have an extension that I use for this it has the syntax:
>>
>> <$set name="plugintiddler" value="$:/plugins/bj/struc">
>> <$list filter = 
>> "[plugintitle[$:/plugins/bj/struc/license]fields[]]">
>>
>> <$view tiddler=<> subtiddler="$:/plugins/bj/struc/license" 
>> field=<> format="text"/> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> I could share it if you like...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:49:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that's what I'm doing. That's how I can display any field if I know 
>>> it's name. I can transclude it using the subtiddler option and the field 
>>> option. I'm looking for the next step - to display all the fields, without 
>>> knowing their names. With a standard tiddler, I would use a fields[] filter 
>>> operator for that. But there is no way to do it for a subtiddler.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:00:29 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:

 you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget

 BJ

 On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> Not see for myself, but *display*.
>
> I already got to the point where I can display each field of the 
> original by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is a filter to list 
> all 
> fields of the tiddler that is inside `[shadowsource[]]`. 
>
> -R.
>
> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 4:51:12 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the 
>>> original shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's 
>>> fields?
>>>
>>
>> Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  
>> back and forth. 
>>
>> -m
>>
>
>
>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/aa2b188f-42be-4b50-ad99-5b0034432030%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-04 Thread BJ
I dont think there is a way to do that.

I have an extension that I use for this it has the syntax:

<$set name="plugintiddler" value="$:/plugins/bj/struc">
<$list filter = 
"[plugintitle[$:/plugins/bj/struc/license]fields[]]">

<$view tiddler=<> subtiddler="$:/plugins/bj/struc/license" 
field=<> format="text"/> 





I could share it if you like...



On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 6:49:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I'm doing. That's how I can display any field if I know 
> it's name. I can transclude it using the subtiddler option and the field 
> option. I'm looking for the next step - to display all the fields, without 
> knowing their names. With a standard tiddler, I would use a fields[] filter 
> operator for that. But there is no way to do it for a subtiddler.
>
> On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:00:29 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>>
>> you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget
>>
>> BJ
>>
>> On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> Not see for myself, but *display*.
>>>
>>> I already got to the point where I can display each field of the 
>>> original by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is a filter to list all 
>>> fields of the tiddler that is inside `[shadowsource[]]`. 
>>>
>>> -R.
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 4:51:12 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote:

 On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the 
> original shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's fields?
>

 Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  back 
 and forth. 

 -m

>>>
>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/33366ca5-bbfc-42d8-8c09-1c793bac6357%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-03 Thread BJ
you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget

BJ

On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> Not see for myself, but *display*.
>
> I already got to the point where I can display each field of the original 
> by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is a filter to list all fields of 
> the tiddler that is inside `[shadowsource[]]`. 
>
> -R.
>
> On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 4:51:12 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>>>
>>> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the 
>>> original shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's fields?
>>>
>>
>> Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  back 
>> and forth. 
>>
>> -m
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e5ef1c80-eb88-40ab-a14c-c341918db400%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-01 Thread PMario
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote:
>
> When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the original 
> shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's fields?
>

Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back.  back and 
forth. 

-m

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0e3d0d8d-6c14-45b9-91d4-657fae382c8b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.