Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Saturday Hangout (#81) on 21st February at midday GMT/UTC

2015-02-22 Thread Neil Griffin
Andreas,

I agree with some of what you say, but I think you are addressing a 
completely different question.  The discussion in the hangout was about 
understanding the users with a view to targeting the documentation, not 
about what TW is good/bad at.


You are arguing that there aren't use cases, but I assume you have your own 
ones or you wouldn't be hanging around this forum, and the same applies to 
everyone here (I currently have about four use cases).  I do agree however 
that it can be difficult to see the use cases until you have already 
explored tiddlywiki a bit.  Tiddlywiki.com could do with more of a use-case 
gallery to inspire potential users with the possiblities.

I think the Excel analogy is a good one.  The first time I ever encountered 
a spreadsheet, it seemed like it would be of little use for anything beyond 
adding up columns of numbers.  Now I use spredsheets for all sorts of 
complicated things, and all sorts of really basic things too.  Similarly, I 
originally viewed TW as just a note-taking platform with limited 
functionality (but the benefit of being non-proprietary).  But as with 
spreadsheet, the built-in complexity meant that the answer to the question 
of 'what is it for?' turned out to be 'just about anything'.  That in 
itself is a benefit - you can learn one tool to be able to do a whole range 
of things that you would otherwise have to learn half a dozen tools for.  
Each alternative tool might do one job better than TW, but an individual 
can achieve more by concentrating on just one tool to do many tasks.

By the way, I very much disagree with your assertion that everyone can be a 
TW pro in a couple of days.  The large majority of real people will never 
have the skills to become a TW pro.  Even among the tiny self-selecting 
group of people who might try to learn TW, I think a couple of days is 
ambitious.  I am technically smart by anyone's standards, but I was baffled 
by the complexities of wikitext for quite a considerable time before I 
found a way in (I think the documentation may have progressed a bit since 
then, but still...).

Cheers,

Neil.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyWiki Saturday Hangout (#81) on 21st February at midday GMT/UTC

2015-02-22 Thread Andreas Hahn

Hey Neil.

I think it is exactly the right place to discuss the hangout. Also, I 
can relate to what you say, putting people in silos might put them off 
of developing further and you are
right that people should always be aware of the possibilities they have 
and how they get there (you will never use excel to plot diagrams and 
approx. function, when all you are told about excel is that you can use 
it for static tables of numbers) (similiarly: I did not advance in vim, 
because they told me that I can write text with it)


(Note: here comes what I think about the discussion)
However, I also think that the discussion missed parts of the problem. I 
don't think TW has the problem that users find it hard or overwhelming 
to get into TW, because people aren't stupid, they are smart, and 
everyone can be a total pro at TW in a couple of days (and by that i 
also mean filters/widgets and all the nice stuff), if they know what 
their goal is.


I think the problem is that TiddlyWiki has no use cases. People simply 
don't know what to use TW for, because it isn't good at anything else 
other than itself.
And part of the reason might be: It is to complex to be used for simple 
note-taking (and therefore not optimized), yet it is too restricted to 
be used for more (like Evernote).


Let me expand on that. For me, I feel like TiddlyWiki is a bubble. It is 
essentially isolated from the rest of the world and the people who enter 
the bubble see how nice and powerful TW is and imagine all the wonderful 
ways it can be used. But it is hard to actually use TW in practice.

To give an example of what I mean:

- TW is used for presenting structured information to others, but 
wordpress and other cms software/apps are much more successful at that.
- TW is used for documenting things, however, you have to put in a lot 
of work to get a system that works good. (Thats why sysadmins use it)
- TW is used to archive information, but only good at doing so with 
textual information.
- Traditional wikis are used to collaboratively work on information, yet 
TW isn't good at that.


So it seems its not "TiddlyWiki - use me for wiki stuff" but rather 
"TiddlyWiki - Find out what to use it for, then find out how to make it 
do that".


Here is a little experiment I did: Search for "Why is Evernote great?" 
on Google and read through the lifehacker articles and whatnot, but 
replace the word 'Evernote' with 'TiddlyWiki' in your head. You will 
notice that not one of them talks about TiddlyWiki and that not because 
they originally talk about Evernote, but its because not one of them 
says: "I like Evernote because it is good at note-taking, 
linking/tagging information and writing/editing".

They all say: "I like Evernote because it is well connected with the world".

/Andreas

P.S.: In fact there are quite a few articles with sentences like: "I 
prefer a simpler, more streamlined note taking app over Evernote."


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.