[twdev] Re: Overview review

[Mat]

Jel wrote:

Is it possible, please, for a group to stand back and look at the public face 
> of TW? 
>

Are you referring to tiddlywiki.com or perhaps tw on github or some kind of 
total TW presence on the web?


...so if I'm looking for the grammar of how to use a slider, for example, I 
> can - at the moment I can't. I evenually found it in my own archive, as I 
> saw this coming.


The documentation on tiddlywiki.com is not clear enough? Not findable? 
(And, actually, the term "slider" is not really used in TW5. We used in in 
TWC but it became ambiguous as slider these days refer to sliding images. 
In TW5, it is probably the revealwidget one is after.)


ask Google to place a preferred autorised start point at the top of any 
> search:


Given the single-file nature of TW I'm not sure that is possible.

Further specific suggestions are welcome. Even if I should add that most 
questions about the website tiddlywiki.com and the github repository are 
solely up to Jeremy to decide about.


<:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/61e952ce-9f51-4853-9551-add5f888671a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[twdev] Re: Overview review

[@TiddlyTweeter]

Jel wrote:
>
> It's all very well advanced users knowing their way around, however coming 
> back to using it after a couple of years has given me a fresh outlook 
> which is less than impressed, it's rather chaotic...
>

I agree. Its chaotic & fragmentary (experientially). And it favours micro 
tech interests over completed applications. No ordinary user is gonna be 
interested in knowing that have to do 7 complex steps to get moving.

In mitigation I would say that the active developers are really passionate 
and not deaf to user needs. BUT they are few and dealing with ongoing tech 
issues, not so much auto-focused on ordinary usage.

It most likely TW needs a Marketing Branch, IMO, of people who are 
face-outwards to get it better  known & used.

Josiah





>
> Sorry about being a little contentious, I'm trying to raise a delicate 
> subject, 
> to allow you to see yourselves as others might see you.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/d470b8a4-bf59-432f-924f-4fb6834e45d7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.