[time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
Hello All,

Does anyone know yet of any companies that are making GPS-III receiver
chip-sets/modules yet?

Some web-sites on GPS-III:

http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/
http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/civilsignals/
http://www.losangeles.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=18830

Regards,
John W.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:14:10 -0700
"John C. Westmoreland, P.E."  wrote:

> Does anyone know yet of any companies that are making GPS-III receiver
> chip-sets/modules yet?

Do you mean a L1 C/A / L2C receiver? I am not aware of any.
AFAIK all dual band receiver are multichip solutions (ie multiple
receiver chips, one for each band). Which makes those rather espensive
for the very cost sensitive consumer market.

Also, if i am not mistaken, only the Block IIM and Block IIF carry
the L2C already (ie 14 satellites). I.e. coverage of that signal
is not complete.

The launch date of the first Block III has been pushed back more than
once. It was meant to be somewhen this year, but i don't know what
the current launch date is projected to be.

Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Datum ts2100 gps error code 41: New clone ace III

2014-07-24 Thread Lizeth Norman
Hi all!
Have a Datum ts2100 that had a failed gps receiver. Found a replacement as
a new "clone". The ts2100 with the new receiver does not set the right
time, however, it does know where it is, reports the gps firmware version
and gives satellite information. Prior to this, the only message that I
could get regarding the gps receiver was "gps engine busy". The ts2100
never illuminates the "lock" or "tracking" led's on the front panel.
When checking the menu available from the front panel, in the timing
section, at the "gps health" prompt, the ts2100 reports the error "gps
doing fixes error code 41"
A google search reveals absolutely nothing.
Norm n3ykf
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Noise and non-linear behaviour of ferrite transformers

2014-07-24 Thread Ackermann, John R
Tom, I'd forgotten about those tests (time flies!).  I strongly suspect 
that the bulk of the tempco is from the BPF rather than the 
transformers.  I've been recommending against install the filter unless 
its really needed, for this very reason.


I'll try to do some tempco measurements of one of my TADD-1 without the 
filter.


John


On 7/19/2014 9:52 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Watch out for the tempco of transformers.
I ran into this with the TADD-1.
Removing the inductors/transformers improved the tempco by 15x.

http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/tadd-1/

/tvb


- Original Message -
From: "Attila Kinali" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 3:09 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Noise and non-linear behaviour of ferrite transformers



Hi,

I'm currently looking at some way of breaking the ground loop between
several systems. The obvious idea would be to use transformers. I would
like to have some kind of rule of thumb to guess how much noise such
a transformer would add. But unfortunately i cannot find any theory
or measurements of this. Does anyone have some pointers to documents
on what kind of noise i could expect (type, and strength) and
what/how strong the non-linear behaviour of transformers would be?

Thanks in advance

Attila Kinali

PS: although this started as something with a real application in mind,
i'm now interested in this as an endavour of its own. So all and any data,
theory or rule of thumb would be appreciated




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Noise and non-linear behaviour of ferrite transformers

2014-07-24 Thread Ackermann, John R

On 7/20/2014 6:41 AM, John Miles wrote:


I often find that when I use coaxial baluns to cut down on ground loop
noise, I end up with more noise and interference than I started with.  Not
always, but often enough that I'm leery of them.

Due to skin effect, most signal propagation in a coaxial cable takes place
between the outer surface of the center conductor and the inner surface of
the braid.  Ideally, the outer surface of the braid just underneath the
jacket will act like an equipotential shield to keep external EMI away from
the signal path inside the cable.

But that's really only true when the cable connects two devices in
well-shielded enclosures that are themselves at a similar ground potential.
When you "lift the ground" with a coaxial balun such as an FTB-1-1+, you can
no longer pretend that the coax braid is at ground potential along its
length.  From an RF perspective the braid is floating at one end, which
makes it an antenna.


Just FWIW, the TADD-1 uses transformers to provide DC isolation, but the 
shield side of the coax goes to ground through a 0.1uF cap.  The hope is 
that this reduces the issue that John's referring to (and which I've 
seen plenty of times using baluns).


John
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Chris Albertson
"GPS-III" is the wrong term.   You mean "block three spacecraft".
The Air Force is buying 8 new satellites they are calling "block III"
and they don't launch until at least 2016.  If the current satellites
are in good health they could delay the launch.   If the past is a
guide to the future the AirForce will eventually buy more advanced
block III called "IIIa" or something.As a GPS users you'd never
really know.  Those numbers are contracting terms, not signal terms.
The signals in question are already being transmitted by a few of the
latter block II satellites.

I think you can buy multi-frequency receivers.  Remember GPS is not
longer the only system.  There are stelites from the US, Europe,
Russia, China and Japan.Adding more more frequencies allows the
receiver to detect multi path and makes it harder to jam but the
timing is not greatly improved over say the M12.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:14 AM, John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
 wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Does anyone know yet of any companies that are making GPS-III receiver
> chip-sets/modules yet?
>
> Some web-sites on GPS-III:
>
> http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/
> http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/civilsignals/
> http://www.losangeles.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=18830
>
> Regards,
> John W.
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] IMD in Broadband Transformers and be careful with that enamel insulation!

2014-07-24 Thread Tim Shoppa
The data and tests presented in this source:

http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/imd_in_broadband_transformers.htm

is a great resource on measured large-signal performance of
binocular/toroidal transformers. One factor found that can really degrade
IMD performance it turns out, is not the magnetic material itself, but  but
physical damage to enamel insulation in winding around corners of
unfinished cores.

My large signal usage of BN73-202's aka 287300202's, is that not only do
they make great 160M transformers, I've also been putting them to use in
multi-watt DC-to-DC step up converters! Similar to the Clifton labs test,
in HV step-up usage I usually find the enamel insulation limits and/or
winding-around-corner damage to be a much more prominent limitation on
performance than the magnetics.

Tim N3QE

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Attila Kinali  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm currently looking at some way of breaking the ground loop between
> several systems. The obvious idea would be to use transformers. I would
> like to have some kind of rule of thumb to guess how much noise such
> a transformer would add. But unfortunately i cannot find any theory
> or measurements of this. Does anyone have some pointers to documents
> on what kind of noise i could expect (type, and strength) and
> what/how strong the non-linear behaviour of transformers would be?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Attila Kinali
>
> PS: although this started as something with a real application in mind,
> i'm now interested in this as an endavour of its own. So all and any data,
> theory or rule of thumb would be appreciated
>
> --
> I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
> the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
> even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
> superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
> -- Sophie Scholl
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Michael Perrett
Chris,
I disagree only with your statement "as a  GPS user you'd never know".

As stated in one of John's references:

The government is in the process of fielding three new signals designed for
civilian use: L2C, L5, and L1C. The legacy civil signal, called L1 C/A or
C/A at L1, will continue broadcasting in the future, for a total of four
civil GPS signals. Users must upgrade their equipment to benefit from the
new signals.


These new signals (will) provide many advantages as seen by the civilian
user, one of the most obvious is the ability to make real time IONO
corrections on civilian receivers (currently restricted to P Code
receivers). Also the new signal structures are more tolerant of both
intended and unintended interference.

Michael
Raytheon Senior Fellow (retired)
Navigation Systems





On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Chris Albertson 
wrote:

> "GPS-III" is the wrong term.   You mean "block three spacecraft".
> The Air Force is buying 8 new satellites they are calling "block III"
> and they don't launch until at least 2016.  If the current satellites
> are in good health they could delay the launch.   If the past is a
> guide to the future the AirForce will eventually buy more advanced
> block III called "IIIa" or something.As a GPS users you'd never
> really know.  Those numbers are contracting terms, not signal terms.
> The signals in question are already being transmitted by a few of the
> latter block II satellites.
>
> I think you can buy multi-frequency receivers.  Remember GPS is not
> longer the only system.  There are stelites from the US, Europe,
> Russia, China and Japan.Adding more more frequencies allows the
> receiver to detect multi path and makes it harder to jam but the
> timing is not greatly improved over say the M12.
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:14 AM, John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
>  wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Does anyone know yet of any companies that are making GPS-III receiver
> > chip-sets/modules yet?
> >
> > Some web-sites on GPS-III:
> >
> > http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/
> > http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/modernization/civilsignals/
> > http://www.losangeles.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=18830
> >
> > Regards,
> > John W.
> > ___
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Hal Murray

> I think you can buy multi-frequency receivers.  Remember GPS is not longer
> the only system.  There are stelites from the US, Europe, Russia, China and
> Japan.Adding more more frequencies allows the receiver to detect multi
> path and makes it harder to jam but the timing is not greatly improved over
> say the M12. 

The main source of error for GPS systems is the delay through the ionosphere. 
 That delay is frequency dependent, so you can do a (much?) better job of 
correcting for that delay if you can get data from a satellite on 2 (or more) 
frequencies.

I think GLONASS and Galileo use frequencies very close to GPS.  The hardware 
in low cost GPS systems will work with no or minimal changes.  It's mostly 
software to take advantage of  the other satellites.  But adding them to your 
bag of tricks won't help the ionospheric corrections.

The extra satellites might help if you are in a place where you can't see 
many GPS satellites.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Synergy-GPS SSR-6tru Problem Resolved

2014-07-24 Thread Bob Stewart
Hi Tom,

I think that an offline conversation with Dusty Morris may have pointed out the 
root cause.  The SSR-6tru board uses 3V logic, but the Motorola Oncore boards 
use 5V.  So the Synergy M12 adapter has to do the level shifting to protect the 
receiver.  It does this for input signals by using a voltage divider composed 
of a 4.7K resistor on top  (for the 5V input) and a 6.8K resistor on the bottom 
to ground.  The center tap of these two resistors goes to the receiver.  
Normally we would expect an open TTL pin to be a logic high.  But, in this 
case, an open pin to the 4.7K resistor on top leaves the 6.8K resistor to act 
as a pull-down on the receiver's input pin.  At least that's my speculation.  
I'm no EE.

Bob




 From: Tom Van Baak 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement  
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Synergy-GPS SSR-6tru Problem Resolved
 

Hi Bob,

That's very good news. Thanks for following through on this issue.

Newcomers to the list should know that unlike many of the large corporations in 
the T&F business, Synergy has been hobbyist and time-nuts friendly since the 
beginning. I know a couple of us bought our first GPS receivers from Synergy in 
the mid-1990's. This was in the early days of GPS where we used Tom Clark's TAC 
h/w and SHOWTIME.EXE s/w, in the same way we use Trimble's Thunderbolt h/w and 
Mark/John's HEATHER.EXE s/w today.

/tvb

- Original Message - 
From: "Bob Stewart" 
To: "Bob Stewart" ; "Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurement" 
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Synergy-GPS SSR-6tru Problem Resolved


As a reminder, I received an SSR-6tru receiver from Synergy, along with their 
M12 adapter, which allows you to plug it into a slot for an Oncore GT+, UT+, or 
VP. I was unable to get the receiver to respond to any commands from the u-blox 
u-center software.

After a lot of troubleshooting, I discovered that pin-5, the "DGPS IN" pin, 
must be brought to a logic level high in order for this assembly to work. If 
it's low, apparently anything going into the board on the Rx line is simply 
sent back out on the Tx line and not passed to the receiver. I've never owned a 
GT+ or a VP, so I wasn't aware that a logic high was needed on this pin. The 
UT+ works just fine with this pin not connected.

Bob


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Al Wolfe
   On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15 and $1 for shipping 
from Taiwan. Supposedly, it does GPS and Glonass. There is a link to a data 
sheet there as well. Might be interesting to play with one and compare the 
results. Stick it in a Tupperware box and nail it to a fence post.


Al, k9si 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:30:07 -0700
Michael Perrett  wrote:

> The government is in the process of fielding three new signals designed for
> civilian use: L2C, L5, and L1C. The legacy civil signal, called L1 C/A or
> C/A at L1, will continue broadcasting in the future, for a total of four
> civil GPS signals. Users must upgrade their equipment to benefit from the
> new signals.

Side note: L1C and L5 will only be available with Block III satellites.
(ie. not before 201x, and even then only one or two satellites)
L2C is available with Block IIM and IIF (13 satellites)

 
> These new signals (will) provide many advantages as seen by the civilian
> user, one of the most obvious is the ability to make real time IONO
> corrections on civilian receivers (currently restricted to P Code
> receivers). 

L1/L2 receivers already exist for civilan use and have been for
some time. The P(Y) code does not need to be decoded for tracking
the signal. This is known as "codless tracking".

Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Edesio Costa e Silva
Try http://navspark.mybigcommerce.com/. A bit more expensive ($25) but comes
with a processor embedded. There is also a GPS+Beidou flavor.

Edésio

(sorry if duplicated)

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:10:35PM -0500, Al Wolfe wrote:
>On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15 and $1 for
> shipping from Taiwan. Supposedly, it does GPS and Glonass. There is
> a link to a data sheet there as well. Might be interesting to play
> with one and compare the results. Stick it in a Tupperware box and
> nail it to a fence post.
> 
> Al, k9si
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Edesio Costa e Silva
Hi!

Try http://navspark.mybigcommerce.com/. A bit more expensive ($25) but comes
with a processor embedded. There is also a GPS+Beidou flavor.

Edésio

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:10:35PM -0500, Al Wolfe wrote:
>On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15 and $1 for
> shipping from Taiwan. Supposedly, it does GPS and Glonass. There is
> a link to a data sheet there as well. Might be interesting to play
> with one and compare the results. Stick it in a Tupperware box and
> nail it to a fence post.
> 
> Al, k9si
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Mark Sims
I have purchased about a dozen of these receivers (mostly the RS-232 version 
for $1 more).   Reyax ships very fast.  I get them in about 1 week.
They work well,  and are based upon the Ublox MAX-7C.  They output independent 
GPS and Glonass NMEA messages and don't appear to merge the two systems in 
their navigation solutions.  I have not done any testing of the 1PPS signal 
(which is brought out to the connector).
--
 On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15  
  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] RE : Re: GPS-III

2014-07-24 Thread Jean-Louis Oneto
Hello, 
While not really monolithic, I have found L1/L2 receivers (mostly for 
navigation, but also in timing flavor) rather well integrated, especially from 
Novatel and Javad. Sadly, their websites don't mention prices. 
Regards, 


Jean-Louis Oneto

Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung 

 Message d'origine 
De : Attila Kinali  
Date :25/07/2014  00:31  (GMT+01:00) 
A : Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement  
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] GPS-III 

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:30:07 -0700
Michael Perrett  wrote:

> The government is in the process of fielding three new signals designed for
> civilian use: L2C, L5, and L1C. The legacy civil signal, called L1 C/A or
> C/A at L1, will continue broadcasting in the future, for a total of four
> civil GPS signals. Users must upgrade their equipment to benefit from the
> new signals.

Side note: L1C and L5 will only be available with Block III satellites.
(ie. not before 201x, and even then only one or two satellites)
L2C is available with Block IIM and IIF (13 satellites)


> These new signals (will) provide many advantages as seen by the civilian
> user, one of the most obvious is the ability to make real time IONO
> corrections on civilian receivers (currently restricted to P Code
> receivers). 

L1/L2 receivers already exist for civilan use and have been for
some time. The P(Y) code does not need to be decoded for tracking
the signal. This is known as "codless tracking".

Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] RE : GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Jean-Louis Oneto
The uBlox Max-7Q seems to be able to merge GPS and GLONASS for navigation, but 
the manual says explicitly that it must be avoided for timing, the delay of the 
PPS from GLONASS being not calibrated (plus various problems related to 
timescales).
Regards, 


Jean-Louis Oneto

Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung 

 Message d'origine 
De : Mark Sims  
Date :25/07/2014  01:15  (GMT+01:00) 
A : time-nuts@febo.com 
Objet : [time-nuts] GPS III 

I have purchased about a dozen of these receivers (mostly the RS-232 version 
for $1 more).   Reyax ships very fast.  I get them in about 1 week.
They work well,  and are based upon the Ublox MAX-7C.  They output independent 
GPS and Glonass NMEA messages and don't appear to merge the two systems in 
their navigation solutions.  I have not done any testing of the 1PPS signal 
(which is brought out to the connector).
--
On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15      
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] IMD in Broadband Transformers and be careful with that enamel insulation!

2014-07-24 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist



On 7/24/2014 9:37 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

The data and tests presented in this source:

http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/imd_in_broadband_transformers.htm

is a great resource on measured large-signal performance of
binocular/toroidal transformers. One factor found that can really degrade
IMD performance it turns out, is not the magnetic material itself, but  but
physical damage to enamel insulation in winding around corners of
unfinished cores.

My large signal usage of BN73-202's aka 287300202's, is that not only do
they make great 160M transformers, I've also been putting them to use in
multi-watt DC-to-DC step up converters! Similar to the Clifton labs test,
in HV step-up usage I usually find the enamel insulation limits and/or
winding-around-corner damage to be a much more prominent limitation on
performance than the magnetics.

Tim N3QE


At HP, we once had a bad run of Mini Circuits transformers that would
fail if used in a high impedance circuit that had different DC
voltages on the windings.  Turns out MCL left off the "Parylene"
coating on the cores that protected the magnet wire insulation.

Rick Karlquist N6RK
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you go looking for them on the auction sites, the RYN25DI from Reyax is the 
search item for the RS-232 version. The RYN25AI is the search item for the not 
RS-232 version. 

Bob

On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Mark Sims  wrote:

> I have purchased about a dozen of these receivers (mostly the RS-232 version 
> for $1 more).   Reyax ships very fast.  I get them in about 1 week.
> They work well,  and are based upon the Ublox MAX-7C.  They output 
> independent GPS and Glonass NMEA messages and don't appear to merge the two 
> systems in their navigation solutions.  I have not done any testing of the 
> 1PPS signal (which is brought out to the connector).
> --
> On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15 
>   
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Chris Albertson
How good is the built-in antenna?  Do they work well in doors away from windows?

The $15 price, low power and 2.5 meter CEP are attractive.   They are
1/2 the price of something else I was looking at.  I'd be using them
for navigation, not timing.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Bob Camp  wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you go looking for them on the auction sites, the RYN25DI from Reyax is 
> the search item for the RS-232 version. The RYN25AI is the search item for 
> the not RS-232 version.
>
> Bob
>
> On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Mark Sims  wrote:
>
>> I have purchased about a dozen of these receivers (mostly the RS-232 version 
>> for $1 more).   Reyax ships very fast.  I get them in about 1 week.
>> They work well,  and are based upon the Ublox MAX-7C.  They output 
>> independent GPS and Glonass NMEA messages and don't appear to merge the two 
>> systems in their navigation solutions.  I have not done any testing of the 
>> 1PPS signal (which is brought out to the connector).
>> --
>> On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15
>> ___
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Alexander Pummer
I received a little package with a GPS receiver + antenna from Gentleman 
[H6m] and I would like to tel him thank you very much

73
KJ6UHN
Alex


On 7/24/2014 5:57 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

If you go looking for them on the auction sites, the RYN25DI from Reyax is the 
search item for the RS-232 version. The RYN25AI is the search item for the not 
RS-232 version.

Bob

On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Mark Sims  wrote:


I have purchased about a dozen of these receivers (mostly the RS-232 version 
for $1 more).   Reyax ships very fast.  I get them in about 1 week.
They work well,  and are based upon the Ublox MAX-7C.  They output independent 
GPS and Glonass NMEA messages and don't appear to merge the two systems in 
their navigation solutions.  I have not done any testing of the 1PPS signal 
(which is brought out to the connector).
--
On eBay the RNY25A1 receiver module sells for $15   

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] GPS III

2014-07-24 Thread Mark Sims
They seem to do pretty well.  I have mine in devices sitting on my kitchen 
floor.  It is downstairs in a stucco over wire mesh house.  Nearest window/door 
is 20 feet away... and it is shaded by a stainless steel covered bridge to the 
guest house.  Also lots of stainless in the kitchen...  they are sandwiched in 
an isle between a pair large SubZero fridge/freezers one one side og the isle 
and a center island clad in stainless.I can take them a few minutes to acquire 
down there and they occasionally lose lock (mainly late at night when the 
geometry/coverage is bad).  I think the NEO-6M receivers may be a tiny bit 
better about acquiring signals.  
-
How good is the built-in antenna?  Do they work well in doors away from windows?

  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.