[time-nuts] Arduino GPIB

2015-01-11 Thread Joseph Gray
I thought everyone here would find this of interest. I stumbled across it a
few days ago on the 'net. It is a Prologix GPIB-USB compatible made with an
Arduino Uno.

http://egirland.blogspot.com/2014/03/arduino-uno-as-usb-to-gpib-controller.html

Like on his web site, I just took a cheap GPIB cable, cut off about 12
inches and shoved the wires into the socket holes on an Uno. I uploaded his
program and did some minor testing so far. BTW, it didn't work the first
time due to poor contact. I shoved some pin headers in, after the wires and
now it works fine.

John's Prologix config program works just fine with this cobbled together
GPIB adapter. I attached it to my HP 3457A and then ran the demo program
that comes with Ulrich's EZGPIB. It is logging data as I type this. I will
do more testing with other instruments, as I have time.

As mentioned on the web page linked above, a few commands are not yet
implemented, although they appear to be little used commands (except
perhaps the ++savecfg command). I think I have a way to implement the ++rst
command using the watchdog timer. For ++savecfg, it shouldn't be too
difficult to store things in the Arduino EEPROM.

I have some cheap Arduino Nano's and PCB-mount GPIB connectors on order. I
will be making a couple of these Proligix-compatible adapters with those
parts, so that they aren't just wires shoved into a board. I'll have to
find a small box to house things. I have also ordered some buffer chips to
add to the design. Total cost should be under $20 for each adapter.

The firmware uses a serial baud rate of 115200, which I assume is the same
as a real Prologix. I'm going to try some higher baud rates to see how fast
the Arduino can push bits without losing them. I understand that with the
default 16 MHz clock, non-standard baud rates that are evenly divisible
into the clock rate should work even better I'll report back.

One question about the baud rate - are there any reasons not to change from
115200? Since we are simply moving bits through a USB/Serial adapter, does
any software really care what the baud rate is, as long as we don't drop
any bits?

Joe Gray
W5JG
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
Martin,

1) Check out www.masterclock.com - they regularly exhibit at PTTI with a wide 
variety of metrology-grade clock displays. The prices were reasonable, although 
you could make one yourself for half the price if you spend a couple of weeks 
of your own time.

2) Scroll through 
http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=IRIG+LED+display+IRIG+timecode

3) On eBay you can sometimes find wonderful 2 or 3 or 4 foot long time displays 
by Austron or Datum; nixie or plasma or LED. Unless you need one next week or 
next month, something will turn up on eBay eventually. It will both be 
functional and have that classic retro NASA look.

3) For a DIY solution consider some of the networkable matrix LED display 
modules:
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/760
https://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?t=7257

And there are many more examples all over the web. See if some of these 
appeal to you:
http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=large+LED+matrix+clock+display

Lastly, this "12ft GPS Wall Clock" wins the prize...
https://www.sparkfun.com/tutorials/47

4) The television monitor ideas are an easy solution. Use a PC or Raspberry Pi. 
One example here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBQ3uqMep58

/tvb

- Original Message - 
From: "Martin A Flynn" 
To: "Bill Hawkins" ; "'Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurement'" 
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock


> Bill,
> Not adverse to using a flat panel and PC hardware.
> 
> Been looking for surplus.  Pretty slim pickings available.
> 
> Hold is required,  Clock will not provide control to external devices
> 
> Martin Flynn

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Wayne Holder
I think that display was built using modules like this:

  http://www.decadecounter.com/vta/articleview.php?item=511

I see them on e-bay from time to time under "in-line readout", but they're
rather expensive and you'd need quite a few,  If you can settle for 7
segment, a modern display you could use is:

  https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8530

Or, perhaps these:


http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/7-Segment-Display-3-Inches-Green-p-1224.html

But, 7 segment just doesn't quite capture that retro feel, IMO.

Wayne

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Martin A Flynn 
wrote:

> I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
> characteristics:
>
>  * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
>  * Second display for GMT.
>  * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
>version for wall mounting
>
> There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this
> photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have
> NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.
>
> Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?
>
> Cheers
> Martin Flynn
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Chris Albertson
I worked at a place where we actually did launch rockets, big ones.
We did have a few LED displays that were driven by IRIG but really the
"clocks" were mostly computer displays with time in the corner some
place. The display is ether on a monotor of it is projected on a
screen.  Projectors have gotten cheap.  Most of those special purpose
displays were stored in closets under boxes IBM punch cards or the
like.

For a display time-nut level accuracy is not really even needed
because the refresh rate on the display is on the order of 1/100
second soi.  NTP over Ethernet is more than enough for a visual
display.   The screen refresh is the weak link,  (well really the
human eye/brain is.)

Now for real time keeping (vs. the display) you probably want
something that runs off GPS.

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Bill Hawkins  wrote:
> Martin,
>
> It seems like the only cost-effective way to get that display is to
> find a surplus source. If that's not possible, how about mounting a
> flat panel computer monitor on the wall and driving it with some
> custom software in a commercial computer with a standard operating
> system. There are standard ways to handle NTP, IRIG-B, and 1 PPS.
>
> Do you need to hold the countdown the way NASA does? Does the clock
> provide the electrical signal to launch or deploy?
>
> Bill Hawkins
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin A Flynn
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:31 AM
>
> I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
> characteristics:
>
>   * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
>   * Second display for GMT.
>   * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
> version for wall mounting
>
> There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this
> photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have
> NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.
>
> Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?
>
> Cheers
> Martin Flynn
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread John Allen
Hi All - this fan is also available at Digikey and Newark and others - 
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/MB40201V2-000U-A99/259-1554-ND/2757779
$5.82 US.

Regards, John K1AE
 
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Götz Romahn
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 10:41 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

Loïc,
I bought this one
http://www.kessler-electronic.de/Luefter/Sunon_DC-Luefter/40x40x20mm/MB40201V2-A99_i1828_40187_0.htm
(in Germany of course), the quietest I could find. Götz

Am 11.01.2015 um 06:59 schrieb Loïc Moreau:
> Hi,
> My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
> ear plugs fast.
>
> If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will 
> be interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.
>
> Regards
> Loïc
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread stan, W1LE

Hello The Net:

Mike, thanks for the 53132A fan info.

I also have a noisy fan. I have considered adding a proportional fan 
controller since more colling is needed
if aditional options are added, like a more stable internal reference or 
a prescalar to 3 GHz or 12 GHz.
Less cooling is needed if no internal options are included. Less cooling 
can mean a slower fan speed and lower acoustic noise.


Anyone have any thoughts on exactly where to put a temperature sensor 
for a proportional fan controller?

The W1GHZ.ORG website had a fan controller.

Anyone have any thoughts on how to increase the intensity of the dim 
display ?   Is it a power supply issue ?


I use my 53132A with TimeLab to measure the performance of different 
oscillators.


Stan, W1LECape Cod   FN41sr



On 11-Jan-15 8:29 AM, Mike George wrote:

I replaced one last year.
I used a Delta EFB4012HD from Digi-Key but it isn't in stock currently.

I just looked up the specs on the fan I removed and matched it to
the fans available.   There were multiple suitable substitutes.

On 1/11/2015 00:59, Loïc Moreau wrote:

Hi,
My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it 
or find ear plugs fast.


If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common 
I will be interested if there is replacement part easily available 
for that purpose.


Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Martin Burnicki

Tom Van Baak wrote:

I haven't looked at the raw data, but using the windows apps:
a Trimble Resolution SMT is showing the leap pending a Motorola UT+ is not.
lady heather is not


Interesting.  I don't see any leap-pending from a Z3801A.  (or a KS-24361)


Hi Hal,

It's not that simple. There are many different levels of leap second 
notification.

1) IERS updates their ftp site (for bots) and sends email (for humans) 
indicating when the next leap second will occur. Days or weeks (and sometimes 
months) later,

2) GPS ground control uploads almanac information to the satellites with 
updated UTC parameters. Four values in page 18 of subframe 4 give the current 
UTC leap second delta and also an optional future UTC delta, with a GPS week 
(LS_f) and day number (DN) when that future delta will be current. By 
definition the leap second will occur at the end of a UTC (not GPS) day.

In this way GPS can provide up to 256 weeks (~4.9 years) of advanced
leap second information and support positive or negative leap
seconds.


Yes, and since the GPS UTC parameters just provide the difference to GPS 
time (in seconds) before and after the leap event time, they could even 
announce a leap event where more than 1 second is inserted or deleted at 
once. ;-)


I'm not aware of any other timing system that could handle this, though.


Note there is no "leap second warning" *bit* in the GPS
spec, per se.

3) Starting up to 12.5 minutes later, GPS receivers will see page 18 of 
subframe 4 from some or all SV and thus know not only the current UTC offset, 
bit when/if a different UTC offset will be valid in the distant future. Prior 
to this (e.g., cold start) there is no certainty of either the UTC offset or 
leap second state.

4a) Since UTC and leap seconds are not needed for navigation, some GPS 
receivers do not bother to tell the user about leap seconds at all.

4b) Some GPS receivers only give the user a leap second warning and so they 
must wait until the month in which the leap second is to be applied before they 
issue the warning. That means they may sit on the internal leap second 
information for many months.

4c) Other GPS receivers give the future date of the next leap second (if any). 
This is not a warning bit, but just the date/time of the next leap second.

4d) Especially dangerous are any GPS receivers that report only a leap second 
warning bit, but don't tell you which month it will occur.

5) Host software (e.g., GPSDO firmware, operating system, drivers, or apps) 
take this information and must only operate on it at the end of the appropriate 
UTC month. Hardcoded rules for June and December are frowned upon.

It would be nice if we pooled together our resources and made a list of which 
GPS/GNSS receivers are 4a, 4b, 4c, or 4d.


It also depends on *how* the leap second warning is made available. If 
an application can read the GPS UTC parameter set then it can compute it 
as soon as the sats start to broadcast it.


There are formats of time string output by GPS receivers which only 
include the leap second warning 1 hour or 1 day before the event.


NMEA sentences don't include it at all, AFAIK. Binary messages may, 
depending on the manufacturer.


IRIG time code signals also don't provide a leap second *warning* flag, 
except the IEEE codes 1344 and C37.118, which only output this 10 
seconds or 1 minute (don't remember exactly without looking) before the 
event.


Martin

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Martin Burnicki

Tom Van Baak wrote:

Keep in mind that this system drives you to having pretty bad time for the
better part of a whole day, on purpose... I realize that when the


Hi Didier,

The google article never claims the smear spans an entire day. I
think you may be confusing references to the leap smear with a DIY
digital clock someone on the list wanted to build (and they proposed
using a slow 86400 second slew).

The google code is "lie(t) = (1.0 - cos(pi * t / w)) / 2.0" and they
are wise not to publish the actual window value, w. If it were me I'd
make it somewhere between a couple of seconds or couple of minutes
but I too would not make it a published or hardcoded constant.


Hm, the article says, "It also made sure the updates were sufficiently 
small so that any software running on the servers that were doing 
synchronization actions or had Chubby locks wouldn't lose those locks or 
abandon any operations."


So I think they smeared it over more than just a few minutes. I'd expect 
some hours, so standard NTP clients would just notify this as clock 
drift (oscillator frequency offset) which they'd have to compensate. 
Since ntpd's control loop is pretty slow it wouldn't respond quickly to 
smears over a few seconds our hours.



Here's the link again:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/09/time-technology-and-leaping-seconds.html

Again, I don't know what value they use, or even if they use the same
value from one leap second to the next. If any of you have inside
contacts with google and can find out let me know, off-list.

>

Regardless, it should be possible to experimentally determine the
smear duration by repeatedly using some google service that returns
time-stamps during the day, hours, minutes, or seconds before and
after June 30. It would make a nice posting for a time nut, or a
research paper for a high school student or undergrad: Experimental
Confirmation of Google's Leap Smear Algorithm.


Yes, interesting idea!

Martin

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Götz Romahn

Loïc,
I bought this one
http://www.kessler-electronic.de/Luefter/Sunon_DC-Luefter/40x40x20mm/MB40201V2-A99_i1828_40187_0.htm
(in Germany of course), the quietest I could find. Götz

Am 11.01.2015 um 06:59 schrieb Loïc Moreau:

Hi,
My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
ear plugs fast.

If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will be 
interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.

Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread paul swed
Low cost is on a PC with a large font.
It in no way will resemble the 1962 clock in your picture. This used
Plexiglas digits with actual lamps like a 327 as an example. I had a
display like that many years ago.

That said I don't know what you would have to drive the down count and then
upcount. Unless you just start the clock at some negative number and when
it hits zero it counts up.

Good luck on your project
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Martin A Flynn 
wrote:

> I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
> characteristics:
>
>  * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
>  * Second display for GMT.
>  * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
>version for wall mounting
>
> There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this
> photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have
> NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.
>
> Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?
>
> Cheers
> Martin Flynn
>
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Martin A Flynn

Bill,
Not adverse to using a flat panel and PC hardware.

Been looking for surplus.  Pretty slim pickings available.

Hold is required,  Clock will not provide control to external devices

Martin Flynn

On 1/11/2015 12:12 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote:

Martin,

It seems like the only cost-effective way to get that display is to
find a surplus source. If that's not possible, how about mounting a
flat panel computer monitor on the wall and driving it with some
custom software in a commercial computer with a standard operating
system. There are standard ways to handle NTP, IRIG-B, and 1 PPS.

Do you need to hold the countdown the way NASA does? Does the clock
provide the electrical signal to launch or deploy?

Bill Hawkins

-Original Message-
From: Martin A Flynn
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:31 AM

I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
characteristics:

   * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
   * Second display for GMT.
   * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
 version for wall mounting

There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this
photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have
NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.

Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?

Cheers
Martin Flynn


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Loïc Moreau
Following your comments, i have opened the enclosure, disconnected the power 
supply and measured  the fan current ( 40mA) when connected to AC line.

Ordered a 4020 model 12V with the proper current, seems very common

My 53132A will be back on stage very soon 

Thanks for your help. 

Regards 
Loïc
   

-Message d'origine-
De : time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] De la part de Bob Camp
Envoyé : dimanche 11 janvier 2015 15:22
À : Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

Hi

A very normal “spiral of death” on the 53132 is the fan going out and the power 
supply following it a month or two later. The supply apparently does need the 
fan cooling to keep it happy. Since the fan runs whenever the counter is 
plugged in, the fan logs a lot of hours. If you do loose the power supply, the 
one in the 53181 will swap over to the 132. It’s not a cheap fix, but better 
than scrapping a 132.

Bob

> On Jan 11, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Loïc Moreau  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
> ear plugs fast.
> 
> If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will 
> be interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.
> 
> Regards
> Loïc
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Chuck Harris

I don't know for sure which category the Ball/Efratom MGPS
(as found in the MFS-XXX Modular Frequency Standard frames) is
in yet But the MGPS has a screen labeled "Current Leap Second",
that according to the manual:

"The display indicates the date and time of the current leap second.
 Leap second data are hourly updated by GPS satellite transmission
 (automatically).

 A leap second can also be programed by the operator.  To program a
 leap second date and time, it is first necessary to select the
 Edit menu by pressing the pushbutton "E""

I had to remove the lithium cell from my unit when I was servicing
it, so it is now displaying some hard reset default value:

Date 17 05 27  Time 23:59:00

If the "Current Leap Second" is indeed updated hourly, and my
display persists in showing a nonsense value, I am wondering if it
might be that it thinks it is in a manually programmed leap second
mode?

Perhaps I should manually program it to: 00 00 00 00:00:00,
and, hope it will get the clue that it is supposed to automagically
update the Current Leap Second from the GPS packets?

I would hate for my MGPS to miss the leap second party because the
manual was unclear.

-Chuck Harris

Tom Van Baak wrote:

I haven't looked at the raw data, but using the windows apps: a Trimble
Resolution SMT is showing the leap pending a Motorola UT+ is not. lady heather
is not


Interesting.  I don't see any leap-pending from a Z3801A.  (or a KS-24361)


Hi Hal,

It's not that simple. There are many different levels of leap second
notification.

1) IERS updates their ftp site (for bots) and sends email (for humans) 
indicating
when the next leap second will occur. Days or weeks (and sometimes months) 
later,

2) GPS ground control uploads almanac information to the satellites with updated
UTC parameters. Four values in page 18 of subframe 4 give the current UTC leap
second delta and also an optional future UTC delta, with a GPS week (LS_f) and 
day
number (DN) when that future delta will be current. By definition the leap 
second
will occur at the end of a UTC (not GPS) day.

...
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Jim Lux

On 1/11/15 7:30 AM, Martin A Flynn wrote:

I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
characteristics:

  * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
  * Second display for GMT.
  * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
version for wall mounting

There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this
photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have
NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.

Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?


What does "cost effective" mean in this context?  Do you have a max 
cost? Is your time cheap and cash dear, so you're willing to build 
stuff, or do you just want to buy something off the shelf so you can get 
it going.


How big does it have to be?  that's probably going to be the big design 
driver:  these days, large flat panel TV/monitor driven by a small 
computer is probably the easiest way.


If you want to go more "traditional", then there are those "flipping 
disk" or flipping page displays, there have been some enormous 7-segment 
displays (not counting the one with 4x8 foot sheets of plywood and a 
team of artists).  There's also "rotating drums" for the digits.







Cheers
Martin Flynn



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Bill Hawkins
Martin,

It seems like the only cost-effective way to get that display is to
find a surplus source. If that's not possible, how about mounting a
flat panel computer monitor on the wall and driving it with some
custom software in a commercial computer with a standard operating
system. There are standard ways to handle NTP, IRIG-B, and 1 PPS.

Do you need to hold the countdown the way NASA does? Does the clock
provide the electrical signal to launch or deploy?

Bill Hawkins

-Original Message-
From: Martin A Flynn
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:31 AM

I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following
characteristics:

  * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
  * Second display for GMT.
  * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
version for wall mounting

There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this 
photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have 
NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.

Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?

Cheers
Martin Flynn


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Sources for Mission Time Clock

2015-01-11 Thread Martin A Flynn
I am looking for a GMT/GET mission time clock  that has the following 
characteristics:


 * Reads T minus prior to launch or deployment,  T plus after.
 * Second display for GMT.
 * Simulating it on a PC display would be OK, would prefer an LED/LCD
   version for wall mounting

There is a example of what I am looking for in the background of this 
photo: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16_116_13_15.jpg   .   We have 
NTP, IRIG-B, and a 1 PPS source to work with.


Any suggestions on a cost-effective way to accomplish this?

Cheers
Martin Flynn



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If section 4 is going to turn in to a list of suspects to investigate and 
tabulate, I would add:

4 e) CDMA runs on GPS (not UTC) time. A “pure CDMA” GPSDO may be coded to 
ignore leap second data altogether. The ones I’m thinking about are the GPSTM 
boxes that put out very CDMA specific timing (pulse very other second not pps 
and all the rest). 

4 f) GPS gizmos that report the leap second correctly and then handle it 
incorrectly (in a variety of ways..) when it occurs. Each time we have a leap 
second the net explodes with reports of these bugs. 

Yes, the second one opens a whole other can of worms. It’s pretty well 
documented already that different firmware rev’s have different issues. Since 
the Motorola Oncore modules have been around the longest, they seem to have the 
most information about these bugs. There is an old Motorola notification on the 
VP, UT, GT and M12 issues (notification_oncore.pdf). It’s no longer on the 
Motorola site, but its hopefully out on the net somewhere.

Bob




> On Jan 11, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Tom Van Baak  wrote:
> 
>>> I haven't looked at the raw data, but using the windows apps: 
>>> a Trimble Resolution SMT is showing the leap pending a Motorola UT+ is not.
>>> lady heather is not 
>> 
>> Interesting.  I don't see any leap-pending from a Z3801A.  (or a KS-24361)
> 
> Hi Hal,
> 
> It's not that simple. There are many different levels of leap second 
> notification.
> 
> 1) IERS updates their ftp site (for bots) and sends email (for humans) 
> indicating when the next leap second will occur. Days or weeks (and sometimes 
> months) later,
> 
> 2) GPS ground control uploads almanac information to the satellites with 
> updated UTC parameters. Four values in page 18 of subframe 4 give the current 
> UTC leap second delta and also an optional future UTC delta, with a GPS week 
> (LS_f) and day number (DN) when that future delta will be current. By 
> definition the leap second will occur at the end of a UTC (not GPS) day.
> 
> In this way GPS can provide up to 256 weeks (~4.9 years) of advanced leap 
> second information and support positive or negative leap seconds. Note there 
> is no "leap second warning" *bit* in the GPS spec, per se.
> 
> 3) Starting up to 12.5 minutes later, GPS receivers will see page 18 of 
> subframe 4 from some or all SV and thus know not only the current UTC offset, 
> bit when/if a different UTC offset will be valid in the distant future. Prior 
> to this (e.g., cold start) there is no certainty of either the UTC offset or 
> leap second state.
> 
> 4a) Since UTC and leap seconds are not needed for navigation, some GPS 
> receivers do not bother to tell the user about leap seconds at all.
> 
> 4b) Some GPS receivers only give the user a leap second warning and so they 
> must wait until the month in which the leap second is to be applied before 
> they issue the warning. That means they may sit on the internal leap second 
> information for many months.
> 
> 4c) Other GPS receivers give the future date of the next leap second (if 
> any). This is not a warning bit, but just the date/time of the next leap 
> second.
> 
> 4d) Especially dangerous are any GPS receivers that report only a leap second 
> warning bit, but don't tell you which month it will occur.
> 
> 5) Host software (e.g., GPSDO firmware, operating system, drivers, or apps) 
> take this information and must only operate on it at the end of the 
> appropriate UTC month. Hardcoded rules for June and December are frowned upon.
> 
> It would be nice if we pooled together our resources and made a list of which 
> GPS/GNSS receivers are 4a, 4b, 4c, or 4d.
> 
> /tvb
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
> Keep in mind that this system drives you to having pretty bad time for the
> better part of a whole day, on purpose... I realize that when the

Hi Didier,

The google article never claims the smear spans an entire day. I think you may 
be confusing references to the leap smear with a DIY digital clock someone on 
the list wanted to build (and they proposed using a slow 86400 second slew).

The google code is "lie(t) = (1.0 - cos(pi * t / w)) / 2.0" and they are wise 
not to publish the actual window value, w. If it were me I'd make it somewhere 
between a couple of seconds or couple of minutes but I too would not make it a 
published or hardcoded constant.

Here's the link again:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/09/time-technology-and-leaping-seconds.html

Again, I don't know what value they use, or even if they use the same value 
from one leap second to the next. If any of you have inside contacts with 
google and can find out let me know, off-list.

Regardless, it should be possible to experimentally determine the smear 
duration by repeatedly using some google service that returns time-stamps 
during the day, hours, minutes, or seconds before and after June 30. It would 
make a nice posting for a time nut, or a research paper for a high school 
student or undergrad: Experimental Confirmation of Google's Leap Smear 
Algorithm.

/tvb

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

A very normal “spiral of death” on the 53132 is the fan going out and the power 
supply following it a month or two later. The supply apparently does need the 
fan cooling to keep it happy. Since the fan runs whenever the counter is 
plugged in, the fan logs a lot of hours. If you do loose the power supply, the 
one in the 53181 will swap over to the 132. It’s not a cheap fix, but better 
than scrapping a 132.

Bob

> On Jan 11, 2015, at 12:59 AM, Loïc Moreau  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
> ear plugs fast.
> 
> If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will 
> be interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.
> 
> Regards
> Loïc
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Mike George

I replaced one last year.
I used a Delta EFB4012HD from Digi-Key but it isn't in stock currently.

I just looked up the specs on the fan I removed and matched it to
the fans available.   There were multiple suitable substitutes.

On 1/11/2015 00:59, Loïc Moreau wrote:

Hi,
My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
ear plugs fast.

If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will be 
interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.

Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
>> I haven't looked at the raw data, but using the windows apps: 
>> a Trimble Resolution SMT is showing the leap pending a Motorola UT+ is not.
>> lady heather is not 
> 
> Interesting.  I don't see any leap-pending from a Z3801A.  (or a KS-24361)

Hi Hal,

It's not that simple. There are many different levels of leap second 
notification.

1) IERS updates their ftp site (for bots) and sends email (for humans) 
indicating when the next leap second will occur. Days or weeks (and sometimes 
months) later,

2) GPS ground control uploads almanac information to the satellites with 
updated UTC parameters. Four values in page 18 of subframe 4 give the current 
UTC leap second delta and also an optional future UTC delta, with a GPS week 
(LS_f) and day number (DN) when that future delta will be current. By 
definition the leap second will occur at the end of a UTC (not GPS) day.

In this way GPS can provide up to 256 weeks (~4.9 years) of advanced leap 
second information and support positive or negative leap seconds. Note there is 
no "leap second warning" *bit* in the GPS spec, per se.

3) Starting up to 12.5 minutes later, GPS receivers will see page 18 of 
subframe 4 from some or all SV and thus know not only the current UTC offset, 
bit when/if a different UTC offset will be valid in the distant future. Prior 
to this (e.g., cold start) there is no certainty of either the UTC offset or 
leap second state.

4a) Since UTC and leap seconds are not needed for navigation, some GPS 
receivers do not bother to tell the user about leap seconds at all.

4b) Some GPS receivers only give the user a leap second warning and so they 
must wait until the month in which the leap second is to be applied before they 
issue the warning. That means they may sit on the internal leap second 
information for many months.

4c) Other GPS receivers give the future date of the next leap second (if any). 
This is not a warning bit, but just the date/time of the next leap second.

4d) Especially dangerous are any GPS receivers that report only a leap second 
warning bit, but don't tell you which month it will occur.

5) Host software (e.g., GPSDO firmware, operating system, drivers, or apps) 
take this information and must only operate on it at the end of the appropriate 
UTC month. Hardcoded rules for June and December are frowned upon.

It would be nice if we pooled together our resources and made a list of which 
GPS/GNSS receivers are 4a, 4b, 4c, or 4d.

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Didier Juges
There are many systems for which the Google fix would not work in the
current state of technology unless implemented by EVERYBODY synchronously.
At least everybody who depends on precise time like banking and financial
systems, let alone the physicists and many others...

Keep in mind that this system drives you to having pretty bad time for the
better part of a whole day, on purpose... I realize that when the
alternative is a system crash, it may sound tempting, but it really is not
a fix, a bandage at most. We have a term for that in French: "emplâtre sur
une jambe de bois", cast on a wooden leg.

Didier KO4BB


On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Henry Hallam  wrote:

> Such slewing solutions are OK for Google.  They wouldn't work well for
> one of the systems I work with, which uses system time to calculate
> the position of a LEO satellite for purpose of pointing a 7.6 meter
> X-band dish.  Half a second of error corresponds to a pointing error
> of 0.5 degrees, well outside the main lobe of the antenna beam.
>
> Anecdotally yours,
> Henry
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Hal Murray 
> wrote:
> >
> > t...@patoka.org said:
> >> 1s/24h = 1/86400 which is approximately 12ppm. That means that Aging
> Offset
> >> could slow down my clock for 1 second if I'll apply the maximum  value
> one
> >> day ahead (roughly). I need to do some experiments first. ;-)  Its
> looks too
> >> unreliable for me.
> >
> > If you do it that way, your clock will be off by a whole second just
> before
> > midnight when the leap-second brings it back into sync.  If you tweak
> your
> > clock from noon-noon, it will only be off by 1/2 second at midnight when
> the
> > sign-bit of the error flips.
> >
> > --
> > These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] June 30 2015 leap second

2015-01-11 Thread Hal Murray

michael.c...@sfr.fr said:
> I haven’t looked at the raw data, but using the windows apps: 
> a Trimble Resolution SMT is showing the leap pending a Motorola UT+ is not.
> lady heather is not 

Interesting.  I don't see any leap-pending from a Z3801A.  (or a KS-24361)

There is another interesting worm in this can...  Various software in the 
chain from Paris to your PC may filter the leap-pending info.

There was at least one bug in ntpd where it told the kernel to leap-tonight 
several months early.

The way it's supposed to work is that ntpd tells the kernel leap-tonight, and 
the kernel will add/delete a leap second at midnight.  That gives the ntp 
servers a whole day to propagate the leap-pending info to lower stratum 
servers and another day to turn it off by the next midnight.

The T2 string from HP GPSDOs includes a slot which is +, -, or 0 for insert, 
delete, or none.  You can ask it when the leap is scheduled, but the code 
didn't do that.  It just assumed the leap was scheduled for the end of the 
current month.  The fix was to add a filter to only pay attention to that 
flag in June and December.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] 53132A Cooling fan

2015-01-11 Thread Loïc Moreau
Hi,
My 53132A cooling fan is becoming extremely noisy so I have to fix it or find 
ear plugs fast.

If anybody as encountered the same problem witch I suppose is common I will be 
interested if there is replacement part easily available for that purpose.

Regards
Loïc

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.