Re: [time-nuts] Performance of 74LVC series ICs

2015-06-09 Thread David McGaw
One thing that is hidden in AC and later CMOS is very tightly controlled 
edge-rate to combat ground bounce.  The original AC components were so 
fast, the ground bounce could be measured in volts and they had to be 
quickly redesigned.


For the D-FF function, you might consider using one section of the dual 
74LVC74.  With the inputs of the unused section connected to ground or 
Vdd, it will draw no power.


David N1HAC


On 6/8/15 8:30 PM, Dan Watson wrote:

I have something of a follow up question. How good is the isolation inside
these devices (74LVC, SOT-23 package) between gates?

Let's say I have a 20MHz TCXO. I want to square up the output signal and
divide by two. Easy, just a buffer or inverter and a flip flop. But looking
at the pinout of the 74LVC1G175 (D flip flop) it doesn't have a Q not
output. So now I need a second inverter to make it toggle. The 74LVC2G14
includes two schmitt inverters in the package, but will isolation inside
the device be good enough to use it for two separate functions at 20 and 10
MHz?

Just from a layout perspective using three devices instead of two would be
easier. However the thing will be battery powered, so I'd like to save the
power if possible.


Thanks

Dan

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andy ai.egrps...@gmail.com wrote:


The gates on that page

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electronic/trangate.html

use bipolar transistors.  The 74LVC parts are CMOS.  There are various
effects caused by that difference.

And those examples have vastly inferior control over input switching
levels, compared to just about any well made digital IC from the last half
century.  (Funny to think that it has been half of a century!)

2N type transistors might have switching delays upwards of 100 ns
(depending on load), whereas the LVC parts switch in the 1-5 ns range.

On the other hand: A well designed discrete circuit can beat a general
 purpose integrated circuit in almost all performance measures.

Some performance metrics would be hard to beat with even a well designed
discrete circuit.  On-die capacitance and inductance tends to be much
smaller than any discrete circuit can achieve.

Andy
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Performance of 74LVC series ICs

2015-06-09 Thread Hal Murray

watsondani...@gmail.com said:
 Let's say I have a 20MHz TCXO. I want to square up the output signal and
 divide by two. Easy, just a buffer or inverter and a flip flop. But looking
 at the pinout of the 74LVC1G175 (D flip flop) it doesn't have a Q not
 output. So now I need a second inverter to make it toggle. The 74LVC2G14
 includes two schmitt inverters in the package, but will isolation inside the
 device be good enough to use it for two separate functions at 20 and 10 MHz?

The simple answer is to use the 74LVC1G74 which has the inverted output.

The complicated answer is more complicated.  What are you using the inverter 
for?  Clock or data?  If both halves are used for data and there is plenty of 
setup/hold time, then the timing through the chip doesn't matter.  If you are 
using it for a clock, then things get interesting.  Is there a fixed phase 
between the 2 signals?  If they never change at the same time, it probably 
doesn't matter.  (How close counts as same might get interesting.)  If they 
do, how nutty are you feeling?  If it mattered, I'd probably do something 
else.  The simplest something-else is to use 2 packages.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Power Supply Suggestions

2015-06-09 Thread Hal Murray

csteinm...@yandex.com said:
 Power One HTAA-16W-A is one popular linear supply for use with the  TBolt. 

I just poked around a bit.  I think the current version is the HTAA-16W-AG.
I assume the extra G is for green.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt power connector crimper

2015-06-09 Thread Chris Albertson
If you only have a handful of pins to crimp, I would not buy the crimper
tool.  It is possible but time consuming to use other hand tools or
solder.  I've done a few that way, and so it takes 5  minutes to make one
connection, if you are only ever going to do four.   I do own watch type
crimpers for the kinds of terminals I use frequently

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Mike Feher mfe...@eozinc.com wrote:

 I forget the size of the pins on the Thunderbolt, but, I bought a crimper
 tool for Molex pins a while ago for a rather good price and really like it.
 This will crimp multiple gauge Molex pins and as I mentioned is very
 reasonably priced.. Shipping to Oz is another matter :).. 73 - Mike

 http://www.powerwerx.com/search.asp?q=ct-oem

 Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc.
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960 office
 908-902-3831 cell

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Matt
 Robert
 Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:29 AM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt power connector crimper

 Hi Guys,

 I am currently in the process of completing my Thunderbolt project and I
 need to find a suitable crimper to attach wires to the pins that go inside
 the power connector.

 The only reference I can find is on this page here (
 http://www.prc68.com/I/ThunderBolt.shtml) that talks about the official
 Molex tool which is scarily expensive, and the page also mentioned a
 Radioshack tool that I can't find any further details on.

 Can someone please point me in the right direction of a suitable crimper
 for the Molex 538-16-02-0103 pins.

 Cheers,
 Matt
 VK2LK
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] TymServe 2100 and the 1995 GPS issue

2015-06-09 Thread Esa Heikkinen

Gerhard Wittreich kirjoitti:


Once locked I did notice
something interesting but maybe not important.  The control voltage to the
oscillator (timing  util  tfp 0) went from a very consistent 0xba6f to a
0xbb02.  That's about 0.2% of scale.  I'll watch it over the next few days
to see where it settles in.


Sounds like oscillator aging to me, sometimes they do larger jumps, stay 
there for a while and then again... Also it would not be suprising that 
this would happen just after the power was off and oven was cooled down 
for a moment.


Also, brand new oscillators seem to age more rapidly at start and then 
settles down when older but the effects of aging will never stop 
completely. But they seem to get better and better when aging.


I'm also waiting my MTI OCXO to arrive...

--
73s!
Esa
OH4KJU
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble 65256 OCXO info?

2015-06-09 Thread Frister
Bob,
I've used one for a simple 10 Mhz ref.
They are 12 V, and indeed the VFC is +2.5V
If you hold the OCXO upside down, the 2 pins at the top are GND and +12V
Bottom 3 Pins - 10 Mhz, unknown and VFC

Frits W1FVB

On 09/06/2015, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 Does anyone have any information about the Trimble 65256 OCXO?  I bought one
 recently and hooked it up to 12V per the vendor.  (Yeah, I know.)  Although
 it worked, it set off such a stench: the usual electronics burning up, give
 you a sore throat smell.  So, I got a replacement and same thing.  For fun,
 I hooked it up to +5V.  It seems to work, it drives the counter, but I
 haven't measured the output waveform yet.  So, does anyone know whether
 these are +12V devices, +5V, or something else?  The VRef output was
 somewhere around +2.5V, IIRC.

 Bob - AE6RV

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
vbradio.wordpress.com
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Performance of 74LVC series ICs

2015-06-09 Thread Dan Kemppainen

Hi Dan,

74LVC1G80. See: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74lvc1g80.pdf

Might be worth looking at.

Dan

On 6/9/2015 4:24 AM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:


Let's say I have a 20MHz TCXO. I want to square up the output signal and
divide by two. Easy, just a buffer or inverter and a flip flop. But looking
at the pinout of the 74LVC1G175 (D flip flop) it doesn't have a Q not
output. So now I need a second inverter to make it toggle. The 74LVC2G14
includes two schmitt inverters in the package, but will isolation inside
the device be good enough to use it for two separate functions at 20 and 10
MHz?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical

2015-06-09 Thread Bert, VE2ZAZ
Hi Tom,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and for having been an inspiration for this 
project.

With a temperature-stabilized setup, it is now concievable to run the system at 
a constant impulse duration. This would not have been possible without 
temperature control, as the pendulum arm length varied too much to maintain an 
oscillation using a constant impulse width. I tried this overnight at a couple 
of occasions with an aluminium arm, only to find the pendulum dead in the 
morning...  :-o

So in order to achieve this, I will add a serial command to keep the last 
impulse duration. That command would be sent once the system is fully 
stabilized.
Thanks,
Bert, VE2ZAZ

Message: 8

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:46:50 -0700
From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
    time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical
    Pendulum
Message-ID: ED4D31631FC440A19A71631386F46143@pc52
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=utf-8

Hi Bert,

Thanks for posting that project. What a wonderful combination of electronic and 
mechanical timing, of design and measurement, of hardware and software, of PICs 
and Python.

One side experiment that would be interesting is to collect a couple of days of 
data using a fixed drive and then compare that with the same number of days 
using your adaptive FLL drive. The resulting phase or rate or ADEV plots would 
be amazing.

/tvb

- Original Message - 
From: Bert, VE2ZAZ ve2...@yahoo.ca
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 10:11 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical Pendulum


 Greetings,
 
 
 I just want to let those who are curious about disciplining a mechanical 
 pendulum that I have pretty much wrapped up playing with a 1m-long pendulum, 
 which I control with PIC micro firmware and try to mainain at a constant 
 temperature. Accuracy for 20-second averaging is typically better than 1 ppm. 
 I have documented my work here:
 
 On my website ( http://ve2zaz.net/Pendulum_Ctl/Pendulum_Ctl.htm ),
 On Youtube ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NdGX4A8W88 )
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bert, VE2ZAZ



   
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Using CPLD/FPGA or similar for frequency

2015-06-09 Thread Alan Ambrose
Hi,



This thread really makes me want to do an FPGA timing project. I have a

Papilio One on hand, which uses the Spartan 3E.



But what to do with it? It has to be something much more interesting than

what a PicDiv or simple logic can do to make it worth my time. Hmm...


How about a 1pS resolution TIC? :)

Or a 12 digit frequency counter? :) :)

It's not a proper time-nut project unless there's a nutty element...

Alan
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] TymServe 2100 and the 1995 GPS issue

2015-06-09 Thread Gerhard Wittreich
Very good point...It is a new oscillator that has been sitting in a box for
10-15 years.  I'll give it a few weeks to settle in.  The other very
interesting thing I noticed was the variability in the oscillator control
voltage before and after installing the new Heol Design GPS.  The moving
average of the standard deviation of the oscillator control voltage before
and after installing the Heol Design gps was striking.  The variability of
the control voltage for the Heal Design is nearly 1/3 of that for the
original Trimble gps.  That suggests that the pps signal from the new gps
module has 1/3 the variability vs the original gps module.  I did consider
that this could be due to the new oscillator aging but when I do a linear
regression on the standard error of the control voltage before replacing
the gps module the p-value for the slope of the line is about 0.5
suggesting that the null hypothesis, that the slope is actually zero,
cannot be rejected.  Therefore, one would need to conclude that there is no
change if control voltage variability vs time prior to the installation of
the new gps module and, consequently, there was no change in the stability
of the new oscillator (since everything else remained unchanged).

Unfortunately, I do not have sufficient run time on the new gps module to
reach any meaningful conclusion of variability vs time.  If anything it
still appears to be dropping at this point.  I can further update once I
get additional run time.

I also noted a very marked improvement in the satellite signal strength
reported by the TS-2100.  While I don't have any statistically sound data
my observation is that the signal strengths are significantly higher and
there are always more viable satellites in view.  In the past I would never
see more that 6-8 with 4-6 having sufficient signal strength.  Now I
routinely see 10 with 6 - 8 having sufficient signals strength.

[image: Inline image 1]
Note: The straight lines represent the mean value and are not linear
regression although the linear regression and the mean line are very nearly
the same for the original GPS data.  I suspect the same will happen once I
get some run time with the new GPS.  Both imply that there is little time
dependence, in the short term, on control voltage variability.

Gerhard R Wittreich, P.E.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Esa Heikkinen tn1...@nic.fi wrote:

 Gerhard Wittreich kirjoitti:

  Once locked I did notice
 something interesting but maybe not important.  The control voltage to the
 oscillator (timing  util  tfp 0) went from a very consistent 0xba6f to a
 0xbb02.  That's about 0.2% of scale.  I'll watch it over the next few days
 to see where it settles in.


 Sounds like oscillator aging to me, sometimes they do larger jumps, stay
 there for a while and then again... Also it would not be suprising that
 this would happen just after the power was off and oven was cooled down for
 a moment.

 Also, brand new oscillators seem to age more rapidly at start and then
 settles down when older but the effects of aging will never stop
 completely. But they seem to get better and better when aging.

 I'm also waiting my MTI OCXO to arrive...

 --
 73s!
 Esa
 OH4KJU

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] More Wenzel Oscillators

2015-06-09 Thread Ivan Cousins
I have two more Wenzel 100MHz Oscillators for sale.
These do not have a voltage tuning port.
The tuning is by a mechanical variable capacitor.
They can also be tuned by varying the supply voltage.

The data sheet is available.

http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/100_MHz_Data_Sheets/wenzel_500-07078.pdf

The phase noise is lower than the previous 100MHz oscillators.

$50.00 for each oscillator.
$10 for each shipping package.
I am willing to ship both oscillators in one package.

Ivan Cousins
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] TymServe 2100 and the 1995 GPS issue

2015-06-09 Thread Tim Shoppa
That sort of control voltage shift is not unusual if you take an OCXO that
had been on for an extended period (for some of us... years or decades!),
let it cool, then start it up again.  Good google search terms are OCXO
retrace and OCXO hysteresis.

Tim N3QE

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Gerhard Wittreich gerh...@wittreich.org
wrote:

 I just received the Heol Design N024 Trimble ACE III clone to resolve the
 week rollover problem we have been experiencing in the TS-2100's with the
 original Trimble ACE III gps units.  Installation was very straight forward
 taking about 5 minutes.  On a cold restart I had Tracking within 40
 seconds with the correct date and time (Leap second issue also resolved)
 and Locked with my new OCXO in ~20 minutes.  Once locked I did notice
 something interesting but maybe not important.  The control voltage to the
 oscillator (timing  util  tfp 0) went from a very consistent 0xba6f to a
 0xbb02.  That's about 0.2% of scale.  I'll watch it over the next few days
 to see where it settles in.

 Gerhard R Wittreich, P.E.

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Sean Gallagher s...@wetstonetech.com
 wrote:

  Hey everyone,
 
  Just wanted to send this out.
 
  It is The documentation that Heol has sent me regarding the GPS
  replacement boards in the 2100. According to them so far they were able
 to
  correct the issues with some fancy firmware on their N024 board. He also
  told me they are going to support firmware updates up to 2035 in case
 more
  issues arise.
 
  He is sending me one of these new units and should arrive within the next
  2 weeks and I'll let you know if it works in my 2100's and my
  Datum/Symmetricom BC635pci cards.
 
  Respectfully,
 
  Sean Gallagher
  Malware Analyst
  571-340-3475
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP5370 Error 04

2015-06-09 Thread Matthias Jelen

Hello John,

thanks for that information. Unfortunately, my fan is 
working. Opening the lid and putting an extra blower to cool 
the VCO helps to extend the time until he error occurs...


Regards,

Matthias


Hello Matthias - I had this problem on my 5370B - it turned out that the fan 
wasn't running, which resulted in overheating.

I hope this helps.

Regards, John K1AE

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Matthias Jelen
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 9:28 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com; dk...@gmx.de
Subject: [time-nuts] HP5370 Error 04


Hello!
  
I´ve got a question to the 5370 experts on the list.
  
I just received my new (old...) HP5370a. It performed fine for abt. one hour, then it started to display error 04 which means PLL out of lock.
  
A look in the service manual revealed that there are several reasons for this. I checked the VCO voltage on both interpolator cards, and indeed, one of them is out of the specified -6V..-3V, it runs to the rail (-12V). Even if the error is not there, the voltage is at abt. -7 V, so I guess it´s just on the edge. The other card is fine.
  
Normally, I´d try the alignment procedure, but I´m missing the exotic HP pulse generator used for the alignment and I have no clue how I could easily substitute this one.
  
Did anyone encounter this problem before? Is there a cure for this problem known to the experts? Any hints are highly appreciated...
  
Thanks a lot,
  
Matthias, DK4YJ

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical Pendulum

2015-06-09 Thread Ian Stirling
On 06/08/2015 01:11 PM, Bert, VE2ZAZ wrote:

 I just want to let those who are curious about disciplining a mechanical 
 pendulum

Hello Bert,

  It is good seeing this in motion.

  I have had this project in mind since I read the article in Scientific 
American,
A Venerable Clock Is Made Highly Accurate By Equipping It with Quarts-Crystal 
Works.,
September 1974. Wall clock of Seth Thomas manufacture, modified by Laurance M. 
Leeds.

 Recently I bought a working pendulum clock with the notion of doing the same, 
but
with modern electronics and a closed loop feedback method, LEDs and sensors,
rather than open loop as in the article.

  It is such a beautiful clock though, and it ticks so nicely, I wonder if I 
should
mess with it even if all my electronics is invisible.

  The SA article really is titled with Quarts.

  .. my first post here, a test as well.

Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR
--



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Performance of 74LVC series ICs

2015-06-09 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The isolation in the package is likely better than the (practical) layout you 
will
do to mate up with them. In fact, the single gate stuff probably does a better 
job
of isolation than the multi gate stuff, simply because you can spread it out on 
the board.

In the case of dividing by two, there are single gate flip-flops that are Q bar 
output 
rather than Q. That eliminates the second single gate package in this design. 
Yes, there
are far to many different numbering systems. Finding this or that can be a 
massive
pain. 

==

If power is an issue, the real trick is to find a family that is happy running 
on a low(er)
supply voltage. Some of this stuff will toggle at 20 MHz with very low supply. 
Often 
the inputs are “high voltage tolerant” even with those low supplies.

Bob

 On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Dan Watson watsondani...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I have something of a follow up question. How good is the isolation inside
 these devices (74LVC, SOT-23 package) between gates?
 
 Let's say I have a 20MHz TCXO. I want to square up the output signal and
 divide by two. Easy, just a buffer or inverter and a flip flop. But looking
 at the pinout of the 74LVC1G175 (D flip flop) it doesn't have a Q not
 output. So now I need a second inverter to make it toggle. The 74LVC2G14
 includes two schmitt inverters in the package, but will isolation inside
 the device be good enough to use it for two separate functions at 20 and 10
 MHz?
 
 Just from a layout perspective using three devices instead of two would be
 easier. However the thing will be battery powered, so I'd like to save the
 power if possible.
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Dan
 
 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andy ai.egrps...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 The gates on that page
 
   http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electronic/trangate.html
 
 use bipolar transistors.  The 74LVC parts are CMOS.  There are various
 effects caused by that difference.
 
 And those examples have vastly inferior control over input switching
 levels, compared to just about any well made digital IC from the last half
 century.  (Funny to think that it has been half of a century!)
 
 2N type transistors might have switching delays upwards of 100 ns
 (depending on load), whereas the LVC parts switch in the 1-5 ns range.
 
   On the other hand: A well designed discrete circuit can beat a general
purpose integrated circuit in almost all performance measures.
 
 Some performance metrics would be hard to beat with even a well designed
 discrete circuit.  On-die capacitance and inductance tends to be much
 smaller than any discrete circuit can achieve.
 
 Andy
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Power Supply Suggestions

2015-06-09 Thread billriches
Meanwell is good - have used several and have had no problems with them.

73,

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of skipp
Isaham via time-nuts
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 6:30 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Power Supply Suggestions

Hello fellow Time Nuts... 

I've obtained a Trimble Thunderbolt (from Ebay) and I'm in the process of
searching out a practical power supply option. I've got the proper plug and
pins already on order from Mouser. 

I've identified the Meanwell T-30B as a decent power supply. I like Meanwell
power supply products quite a bit. 

Anyone have pro or con comments or alternative supply suggestions, else I go
with the t-30b unless something else crosses my radar screen. 

Thank you in advance for your replies 

regards, 

skipp 

skipp025 at ya who period com
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Performance of 74LVC series ICs

2015-06-09 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The question is always “good isolation compared to what?”. 

If you are expecting 180 db of isolation on a SOT-23 package at 10’s of MHz, 
it’s
not going to happen. It’s also not going to happen with a practical pc board 
layout
even without the SOT-23 involved. 

If something around 120 db is “good isolation”, then yes you can do that with a 
pair of the SC-70 parts and a good layout. In this case the test was at 10 MHz.

Bob

 On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:26 AM, Andy ai.egrps...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 I have something of a follow up question. How good is the isolation inside
 these devices (74LVC, SOT-23 package) between gates?
 
 
 Maybe it's just me ... but I wouldn't trust the isolation to be good.
 Apart from on-die coupling, they share the same power/ground leads, however
 short they are.  So just getting power and ground from the board onto the
 die, they would be corrupted by what happens in the other gate and its load
 (L*di/dt).
 
 Andy
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical

2015-06-09 Thread Alexander Pummer

Hi Bert
at the Neu Tecknicumbuchs, /Buchs/, Switzerland somebody made a diplom 
work a quite-few years ego very similar clock, the pendulum was 
synchronized to the 75kHz accurate time transmitter, you may could find 
out more about it at  the Neu Tecknicumbuchs, /Buchs/, Switzerland

73
KJ6UHN
Alex

On 6/9/2015 7:26 AM, Bert, VE2ZAZ wrote:

Hi Tom,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and for having been an inspiration for this 
project.

With a temperature-stabilized setup, it is now concievable to run the system at 
a constant impulse duration. This would not have been possible without 
temperature control, as the pendulum arm length varied too much to maintain an 
oscillation using a constant impulse width. I tried this overnight at a couple 
of occasions with an aluminium arm, only to find the pendulum dead in the 
morning...  :-o

So in order to achieve this, I will add a serial command to keep the last 
impulse duration. That command would be sent once the system is fully 
stabilized.
Thanks,
Bert, VE2ZAZ

Message: 8

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:46:50 -0700
From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical
 Pendulum
Message-ID: ED4D31631FC440A19A71631386F46143@pc52
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8

Hi Bert,

Thanks for posting that project. What a wonderful combination of electronic and 
mechanical timing, of design and measurement, of hardware and software, of PICs 
and Python.

One side experiment that would be interesting is to collect a couple of days of 
data using a fixed drive and then compare that with the same number of days 
using your adaptive FLL drive. The resulting phase or rate or ADEV plots would 
be amazing.

/tvb

- Original Message -
From: Bert, VE2ZAZ ve2...@yahoo.ca
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 10:11 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] Electronically Disciplined Mechanical Pendulum



Greetings,


I just want to let those who are curious about disciplining a mechanical 
pendulum that I have pretty much wrapped up playing with a 1m-long pendulum, 
which I control with PIC micro firmware and try to mainain at a constant 
temperature. Accuracy for 20-second averaging is typically better than 1 ppm. I 
have documented my work here:

On my website ( http://ve2zaz.net/Pendulum_Ctl/Pendulum_Ctl.htm ),
On Youtube ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NdGX4A8W88 )

Thanks,

Bert, VE2ZAZ




___

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.