[time-nuts] Greetings from Australia

2015-06-29 Thread Brek Martin
Hi Guys :)
I thought I’d say thanks for the add to the group and introduce myself.

I’m only starting to get compulsive about time and frequency.
My findings so far are that only the timing of the next second matters because 
it’s too late
to worry about the current second by the time you have the information about it.
It’s +10 hours here so I have to add 10 to everything, and that could increment 
the date,
so then a whole calendar program is required to know what the next date will be,
just because you need to know what date it will be on the next seconds tick 
that occurs.

I have a question…
Is the reason most amateur radio people care about accurate frequency mostly 
about
operating at higher radio frequencies?
I imagine if a bunch of radio enthusiasts aligned their HF radios with atomic 
standards for use
on those bands that doppler shift would ruin everything the additional hardware 
put into it.
Cheers, Brek.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Reeeely long term HP 5065A drift rate (13 year!)

2015-06-29 Thread cdelect
I recently had a unit come in for repair that I had sold 13 years ago.

The owner never did ANY adjustments on the unit.

After the repair (which would not have affected the frequency) and before
aligning the unit I decided to check and see how far it had drifted in
the 13 years.

Did a run against an HP 5071A and the frequency offset is 2.1X10-11th
best case and 4.1X10-11th worst case.

This gives an average of  1.65X10-12th to 3.15X10-12 per year!

Pretty amazing!

Cheers,

Corby

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Splitters for the GPS antenna

2015-06-29 Thread Mark Spencer
The GPS splitter is spoken for.

Thanks
Mark Spencer

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 25, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Mark Spencer m...@alignedsolutions.com wrote:
 
 Sorry for the thread hi jack.   I also have a lightly used Symmetricom 58535A 
 dual port (one antenna, two receivers) gps splitter I would be happy to part 
 with.
 
 Please contact me off list of interested in this and perhaps we can come an 
 agreement.   It's fairly heavy so shipping may be pricey.
 
 Thanks
 Mark Spencer
 m...@alignedsolutions.com
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Jun 25, 2015, at 6:18 AM, Cash Olsen radio.kd5...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I initially tried using Dishtv splitters with qualified success. On closer
 examination the bandpass between dish 1 and dish2 is different and neither
 actually calmed to pass the GPS frequencies. And indeed I had significantly
 different path losses.
 
 I wanted a better solution. I did a brief search and found the following.
 The results are much better and the price was very reasonable. My path
 losses appear to be balanced and generally agree within 1dB, with at least
 10 SV reporting 39 - 49dB. The splitter I tried has a claimed bandwidth of
 40 to 2400 MHz and a all ports power pass.
 
 Of course you have to have the adaptors from type N to type F and type F to
 type SMA. I was able to find all of those on Amazon and don't forget some
 type F terminators, they are hard to find in local box stores.
 
 Hope this helps some of the new guys, like myself, to get their labs up a
 little quicker.
 
 
 Computer Network Accessories, Inc.
 5520 Burkhardt Road
 Dayton, Ohio 45431
 Web: www.CNAweb.com http://www.cnaweb.com/
 Email: sa...@cnaweb.com
 Phone: 937-258-2708 - Fax: 937-258-2743
 
 
 Product NamePart No.QuantityItem PriceTotal Price4 Way 2GHz Splitter w/ DC
 Pass72-2443$4.10$12.30
 Subtotal:$12.30Shipping  Handling:$7.35Tax:$0.00
 --
 Order Total:$19.65
 
 -- 
 S. Cash Olsen KD5SSJ
 ARRL Technical Specialist
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Casio Watches 13 Year Drift in Seattle

2015-06-29 Thread Bryan _
But wouldn't normal watch wear just balance itself over time, one wears their 
watch for say 12 hours and the rest it sits on a counter at a much colder 
temperature. So wonder if Casio would actually go to such lengths to 
compensate. Maybe, interesting though.

-=Bryan=-

 From: kb...@n1k.org
 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 20:41:15 -0400
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Casio Watches 13 Year Drift in Seattle
 
 Hi
 
 Just to clarify:
 
 In the “art” the watches all ran fast rather than slow. They *would* have run 
 slow if the
 room temperature / skin temperature delta was an issue. Since they did not, 
 one assumes 
 that Casio digitally compensates this model (and probably all their watches). 
  The typical 
 watch tuning fork will shift more than the observed delta when run in a cold 
 court house if 
 un-compensated.
 
 By far the best explanation is the “set to deliberately run fast” one.
 
 Bob
 
  On Jun 27, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  My Casio g shock keeps extraordinary time. I did open it up and tune it,
  but still I'd expect it to drift.
  
  After 6 months untouched I still can't separate by eye the second from UTC.
  
  Also, with regard to the video's query about all the clocks running slow -
  they have been tuned to run at the temperature of a person's wrist.
  
  On Sunday, 28 June 2015, John Stuart j.w.stu...@comcast.net wrote:
  
  I think there may be a new Time-Nut in the Seattle area, , ,
  
  Art, Engineering and Justice - how accurate is a Casio watch?
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwOMUhS8gV0
  
  
  
  John, KM6QX
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com javascript:;
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Greetings from Australia

2015-06-29 Thread Michael Perrett
Alex, Brek - the Doppler effect is primarily an effect of the ionosphere
moving. A 24 hour measurement of WWV on 20 Mhz shows as much as +/- 800 mHz
movement, all due to Doppler. Note that if you run the measurement over
several days at the same time of year the measured frequency will strongly
correlate with time of day. This varies both with time of day and season
as the height of the ionosphere varies. To a much lesser effect most of us
nuts see a variation due to room temperature as this effects the frequency
reference of the measurement oscillator. This effect in my shack
(uncompensated) varies about +/- 1 mHz over a 20 degree (F) temperature
change.

73, Michael / K7HIL

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Alex Pummer a...@pcscons.com wrote:

 Not exactly Brek, as long as the position of the two stations, which are
 in contact with each other, does not vary in the time, you don't have to
 worry about Doppler effect, also if you are trying to get in touch in SSB
 mode in the 13cm  band, you rather have a precise frequency reference and
 actually the other site should have too to find each other,
 and where the Doppler  would effect your communication a special
 combination of hardware-software could provide a compensation.
 73
 KJ6UHN
 Alex


 On 6/29/2015 9:33 AM, Brek Martin wrote:

 Hi Guys :)
 I thought I’d say thanks for the add to the group and introduce myself.

 I’m only starting to get compulsive about time and frequency.
 My findings so far are that only the timing of the next second matters
 because it’s too late
 to worry about the current second by the time you have the information
 about it.
 It’s +10 hours here so I have to add 10 to everything, and that could
 increment the date,
 so then a whole calendar program is required to know what the next date
 will be,
 just because you need to know what date it will be on the next seconds
 tick that occurs.

 I have a question…
 Is the reason most amateur radio people care about accurate frequency
 mostly about
 operating at higher radio frequencies?
 I imagine if a bunch of radio enthusiasts aligned their HF radios with
 atomic standards for use
 on those bands that doppler shift would ruin everything the additional
 hardware put into it.
 Cheers, Brek.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Casio Watches 13 Year Drift in Seattle

2015-06-29 Thread Chuck Harris

Back in the day when mechanical escapement pocket watches, and wrist
watches were state of the art, the jeweler would adjust the watch to
run at a normal rate, and give them a daily wind.  Everything looked
nice in the display case.

When a customer bought a watch, the jeweler would set the watch to
his shop clock, and instruct the customer to wear, and wind the watch
normally for two weeks, but do not set it.  At the end of the two
weeks, bring the watch back to the shop for a check up...

When the watch came back, the jeweler would calculate the number of days
the watch had been worn, note the difference from his shop clock, and
calculate the daily rate of the watch.  He would then set his timing
machine for the the inverse of that rate, and set the watch to match.

Now, when the customer wore his watch, the watch would seem to always
be right on because it was adjusted for a rate that compensated for
the customer's patterns of wearing the watch...his personal error.

This trick had an added advantage because the customer got to see
how so-so his brand new watch behaved during those two weeks, and
got to be dazzled by his jeweler's rare ability to make the new
watch perform so much better than the factory could!

If this was normal back at the turn of the 20th century, why wouldn't
Casio, and others at least do as well?  Especially now that all
electronic watches have a microprocessor built in... complete with
temperature sensing diodes, battery monitors, and other nifty gadgets.

-Chuck Harris



Bryan _ wrote:

But wouldn't normal watch wear just balance itself over time, one wears their
watch for say 12 hours and the rest it sits on a counter at a much colder
temperature. So wonder if Casio would actually go to such lengths to compensate.
Maybe, interesting though.

-=Bryan=-

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Greetings from Australia

2015-06-29 Thread Mark Spencer
Hi Brek.   In my experience the perceived frequency difference from Doppler 
shift is of little or no relevance for amateur HF communications.   For 
amateurs involved in activities such as the frequency measurement test I 
believe it could be at times relevant at HF.  There might be a mode where 
Doppler shift is relevant for HF communications but I have never run across it.

In my experience when communicating at VHF and beyond it is helpful to have an 
accurate frequency standard when using modes such as CW, SSB, JT65 etc.

I routinely check the calibration of my 1.2 GHz (23 cm) SSB / CW setup each 
time I turn on the radio.   I use a GPSDO as a frequency source for this.  
Knowing the radio is on frequency gives me one less thing to worry about when 
trying to make 100 mile plus contacts on this band.  Even through the radio has 
a tcxo I still need to check the frequency each time I turn it on.

From time to time I also check the calibration of my lower frequency equipment 
as well.   The gear with TCXO's is usually close enough in frequency that I 
can use it on SSB and CW without having to worry about the difference between 
the dial frequency and the actual frequency.   

Radios that just have a plain crystal oscillator usually require me to figure 
out the difference between the dial frequency and the actual frequency when 
operating using SSB and CW at 144 MHz and higher.  

When using wider band modes such as FM on 144 and 440 MHz and narrow band modes 
below 30 MHz I usually trust that the dial frequency on the radio will be close 
enough.

I hope this was of some interest.

Best regards
Mark S
VE7AFZ

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jun 29, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Brek Martin bmar8...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
 
 Hi Guys :)
 I thought I’d say thanks for the add to the group and introduce myself.
 
 I’m only starting to get compulsive about time and frequency.
 My findings so far are that only the timing of the next second matters 
 because it’s too late
 to worry about the current second by the time you have the information about 
 it.
 It’s +10 hours here so I have to add 10 to everything, and that could 
 increment the date,
 so then a whole calendar program is required to know what the next date will 
 be,
 just because you need to know what date it will be on the next seconds tick 
 that occurs.
 
 I have a question…
 Is the reason most amateur radio people care about accurate frequency mostly 
 about
 operating at higher radio frequencies?
 I imagine if a bunch of radio enthusiasts aligned their HF radios with atomic 
 standards for use
 on those bands that doppler shift would ruin everything the additional 
 hardware put into it.
 Cheers, Brek.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Greetings from Australia

2015-06-29 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

 On Jun 29, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Brek Martin bmar8...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
 
 Hi Guys :)
 I thought I’d say thanks for the add to the group and introduce myself.
 
 I’m only starting to get compulsive about time and frequency.
 My findings so far are that only the timing of the next second matters 
 because it’s too late
 to worry about the current second by the time you have the information about 
 it.
 It’s +10 hours here so I have to add 10 to everything, and that could 
 increment the date,
 so then a whole calendar program is required to know what the next date will 
 be,
 just because you need to know what date it will be on the next seconds tick 
 that occurs.
 
 I have a question…
 Is the reason most amateur radio people care about accurate frequency mostly 
 about
 operating at higher radio frequencies?
 I imagine if a bunch of radio enthusiasts aligned their HF radios with atomic 
 standards for use
 on those bands that doppler shift would ruin everything the additional 
 hardware put into it.

Yes and no.

If the ionosphere is getting involved (or other forms of propagation) then yes 
you will get time
varying path length. The result will be a time varying phase modulation. Your 
frequency 
will always be correct. The signal “as received” will appear to be off 
frequency due to the 
phase shift caused by the path length continuously changing. 

Bob

 Cheers, Brek.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Greetings from Australia

2015-06-29 Thread Alex Pummer
Not exactly Brek, as long as the position of the two stations, which are 
in contact with each other, does not vary in the time, you don't have to 
worry about Doppler effect, also if you are trying to get in touch in 
SSB mode in the 13cm  band, you rather have a precise frequency 
reference and actually the other site should have too to find each other,
and where the Doppler  would effect your communication a special 
combination of hardware-software could provide a compensation.

73
KJ6UHN
Alex


On 6/29/2015 9:33 AM, Brek Martin wrote:

Hi Guys :)
I thought I’d say thanks for the add to the group and introduce myself.

I’m only starting to get compulsive about time and frequency.
My findings so far are that only the timing of the next second matters because 
it’s too late
to worry about the current second by the time you have the information about it.
It’s +10 hours here so I have to add 10 to everything, and that could increment 
the date,
so then a whole calendar program is required to know what the next date will be,
just because you need to know what date it will be on the next seconds tick 
that occurs.

I have a question…
Is the reason most amateur radio people care about accurate frequency mostly 
about
operating at higher radio frequencies?
I imagine if a bunch of radio enthusiasts aligned their HF radios with atomic 
standards for use
on those bands that doppler shift would ruin everything the additional hardware 
put into it.
Cheers, Brek.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Large clock display from NMEA input? (Should understand leap second).

2015-06-29 Thread Dave Martindale
Tomorrow evening, I'm going to a leap second barbecue.  The barbecue itself
was the idea of a friend, but I'm bringing the equipment to show the leap
second.

My main setup is a Thunderbolt, Lady Heather running on a PC laptop, and a
serial to USB converter.  It's all working sitting here on a desk this
evening, so the only thing I can't test in advance is the leap second
itself.  I haven't had the Thunderbolt running during a leap second before,
but there is a YouTube video showing the June 2012 leap second as handled
by a Thunderbolt and Lady Heather, so I'm assuming all will work as
expected.

Never one to trust a single piece of hardware completely, I want to bring a
backup.  I have an old Garmin GPS-25 board mounted in a box with power
supply and RS-232 level converters, so I want to bring it too. I have
watched a leap second previously on the GPS-25, so I know it handles the
event properly.  But the GPS-25 is NMEA output so it won't work with Lady
Heather.  I need something else to display a digital clock that everyone
can see, from a NMEA data stream.

VisualGPS displays a bunch of interesting stuff, but not time.  U-center
from u-blox displays UTC as both analog and digital clock, and the analog
clock can be made as large as you have screen space for.  Does anyone know
what it does with a leap second?

Are there other programs I should look at?

- Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.