[time-nuts] TNS-BUF
Hi All, Is there any TNS-BUF Isolation Amplifier boards available out there? Regards, VS ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PN on internal/external references and Cross correlation
Thanks for clarifying this issue! I may use references with close-in PN (1Hz-1kHz) 10 dB noisier than the DUT, however as you said it may require an overnight run for 1 Hz offset, which isn't the nice part... I assume then that speeding up the measurement process can only be obtained using references sources at least quieter than the DUT. Em 2017-09-28 23:29, John Miles escreveu: In a PN measurement system with a dual channel cross correlation is there a simple rule of thumb for how low should be the PN of the (external) references compared to the DUT? (even with a 20 dB noise floor improvement with 1 cross correlations) If you have two references, then it's OK for them to be somewhat noisier than the DUT. Their contribution will average out of the cross spectrum over time just like the rest of the instrument noise. There is no penalty in accuracy, only in measurement time. Given a choice, you're better off using references with good close-in noise performance rather than good broadband performance, since it takes longer for those FFT segments to converge. You can achieve 20 dB of noise floor improvement at offsets >10 kHz within a few minutes, but a 20-dB improvement at 1 Hz might require running overnight or even longer. In the case of the references have an equal noise contribution compared to the DUT will the results suffer from loss of accuracy? With two references it's not a problem. If you have only one reference source -- or if your measurement setup doesn't do cross correlation at all -- then the reference needs to be at least 10 dB quieter than the expected DUT performance to keep its contribution below 0.5 dB. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] PN on internal/external references and Cross correlation
Hi All, In a PN measurement system with a dual channel cross correlation is there a simple rule of thumb for how low should be the PN of the (external) references compared to the DUT? (even with a 20 dB noise floor improvement with 1 cross correlations). In the case of the references have an equal noise contribution compared to the DUT will the results suffer from loss of accuracy? Thanks! Regards, VS ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 rubidium lamp module failure
I agree with Arthur. It's not possible that such temperature had happened. My unit had a severe board and components electrochemical corrosion probably caused by a mix of factors as flux residues action and the pcb coating that simple dissapear. I think that all together under hot conditions in a small enclosure is the most probably reason to that failure. Also, in picture it can be seen clearly many spots with electrochemical corrosion. - Original Message - From: "Arthur Dent"To: Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:06 AM Subject: [time-nuts] PRS10 rubidium lamp module failure ..."apparently got hot enough to create a localized thermal runaway in its lead wire." I don't think that explanation is correct. There are no signs of discoloration caused by overheating anywhere else in the photo and yet the lead wire has apparently melted as you say. That would probably require at least a 2000 degree temp which would cause lots of damage. Are there any signs of chemical contamination that could have caused this? Not the same but In older equipment that had leaky Hg batteries I've seen similar damage. -Arthur ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 rubidium lamp module failure
Hi, I had the same problem a few years ago. What kind of advice are your searching for to that "usual" failure? Regards, VS - Original Message - From: "Stewart Cobb"To: Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:47 PM Subject: [time-nuts] PRS10 rubidium lamp module failure R901, on the far right, is shown on the schematic as "air heater". It apparently got hot enough to create a localized thermal runaway in its lead wire. There was ample evidence of arcing. A half-melted bit of wire fell away before I could take the picture. Without that heater working, the lamp is apparently too cold to start. Cheers! --Stu ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Recommendations on a reliable Rb Osc
Hi All, I'm interested on a 10 MHz Rb Oscillator. Does anyone have good advice's on a particular model and brand? I prefer a new one with a good price but second hand is also welcome;) Regards, Vasco ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] 10MHz Square to Sine Wave Conversion
Hi, What distortion level would you like to achieve? Regards, Vasco Soares Em 2015-07-16 18:49, skipp Isaham via time-nuts escreveu: re: 10MHz Square to Sine Wave Conversion The GPSDO I recently acquired outputs a 10 MHz square wave. I'd like to convert it to a sine wave and I am looking for suggestions and info re any reasonable pre-made circuits and/or boards. No sense reinventing the wheel if I can avoid it. Otherwise I will start from scratch and make a new wheel Thank you in advance for your replies. Regards, skipp skipp025 at yahoo dot com ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Signal/Phase noise analyzer
Thank you all for your reply's! It is for personal use, not a business. The budget it is very tight. I guess I can't find anything less that 2000-3000 euros even a second hand or a refurbished model. The main problem is that I'm starting from scratch... I found http://www.anapico.com/index.php/products/phase-noise-test-systems and the cheapest model (apph6000-is400) fits my needs (-160 dBc @ 100 Hz it is low enough) but it is too expensive (an outrageous of 18000 euros!). Their advantage, as in others, is to be a self contained analyzer with internal references. I don't know the price range of the Holzworth analyzer's but surely they are affordable compared with the one above. The model HA7402B needs two tunable LO, which I don't have, so a lot of investment has to be done. I can consider any setup as long as the above requirements are fulfilled and it is an affordable solution otherwise I've to wait for gather enough funds for this kind of investment. Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:36 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Signal/Phase noise analyzer Hi Is this for a business or for a basement? Basement Are you looking for new self contained gear or combinations of used gear? Is a cross comparison device ok or do you need a stand alone device? How low do you need to go how fast? Is -190 dbc/ Hz low enough? Is a 24 hour run to long? Lots of variables…. Bob On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Vasco Soares vesoa...@deea.isel.ipl.pt wrote: Hi All, I'm searching for the less expensive signal analyzer to perform phase noise measurements on OCXO's. There is no need to go above 400 MHz - 1 GHz. I'm particularly interested on low frequency offset and good close in phase noise specs. Any recommendations? Best regards, Vasco Soares ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Signal/Phase noise analyzer
Hi All, I'm searching for the less expensive signal analyzer to perform phase noise measurements on OCXO's. There is no need to go above 400 MHz - 1 GHz. I'm particularly interested on low frequency offset and good close in phase noise specs. Any recommendations? Best regards, Vasco Soares ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Are these PRS10's worth it ?
Hi I had two PRS10 units that failed after one year of use. It was not just the lamp, also the RF section that excites the lamp had problems. I think it is too expensive... Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: Tim t...@skybase.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 2:22 AM Subject: [time-nuts] Are these PRS10's worth it ? Hi all, Been on the lookout for a PRS10 to build a GPSDO+RB arrangement and I see these... http://www.ebay.com/itm/Stanford-Research-Systems-SRS-PRS10-Rubidium-Freq-Standard-12344101-08-no-lock-/231435472155 Is this just a reheat-the-bulb fix or do you suspect something more ? Not knowing much about the PRS10, I'm just wondering if its worth the ri$k :) thanks Tim -- VK2XAX :: QF56if23 :: BMARC :: WIA :: AMSATVK ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Linear voltage regulator hints...
Hi All, Take a look on the low noise 1.5A LDO regulator LT1963 and 500 mA LT1763. Voltage regulation depend on how good is the circuit behaviour with respect to Noise, PSRR, Line regulation and Load regulation. For instance some LT regulators like LT1117, 1085 and 1086 have 1% of Line and Load regulation but have worst noise specs than LT1963, LT1763, MCP1825, MCP1826. Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: Dan Kemppainen d...@irtelemetrics.com To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 4:57 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Linear voltage regulator hints... Hi All, Thanks for the responses. I had a feeling the answer wouldn't be good, but was hoping someone would have a suggestion. There are currently a bunch of regulators in the 'system'. If there were some really good regulator out there, the shotgun approach would apply... Of course it is difficult to provide a good reference and pass transistor on the same die, but it was worth asking. Bert, The thought of temp control of the regulators crossed my mind. Not planning on going there unless I need to. But it was a thought, maybe if all else fails... Bob, There are more modern parts with lower close in noise. Linear Technology has a number of them. Your filter caps take out the broadband stuff, close in is all that really matters. Got any hints on which ones? Maybe a nice quiet regulator can be 'disciplined' with a better reference. Thanks, Dan ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Clock level conversion 5V - 3.3V
Hi, More than a matter of personal taste avoiding a resistive divider using a active circuit you could benefit from its low output impedance. With a resistive divider there could be some issues in terms of impedance matching when a load it is present but as been said it all depends on how good that level translation should be. Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Cc: hmur...@megapathdsl.net Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:10 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Clock level conversion 5V - 3.3V vesoa...@deea.isel.ipl.pt said: I would suggest some 3.3V logic (inverter) gate with 5V tolerant inputs from Little Logic TI portfolio. There are buffered and unbuffered gate available. What's the advantage of a chip over a pair of resistors? hau...@keteu.org said: I have seen a resistive divider used in a similar application, but wondered if I could save the couple dozen mA they were spending. Power might be one. If it's a long enough run that you need a termination, then the power doesn't cost anything extra. If it's only a few inches, you can use higher values of resistance to save the power. For a given value of resistance and a specific chip, there should be some crossover frequency where the power of the chip matches the power of the resistors. It might be fun to play with the numbers. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Clock level conversion 5V - 3.3V
I would suggest some 3.3V logic (inverter) gate with 5V tolerant inputs from Little Logic TI portfolio. There are buffered and unbuffered gate available. Em 2014-09-30 22:46, Mark Haun escreveu: Is there a best way to do this without adding phase noise? For example, a 5V OCXO into an ADF4002, or a 3.3V or even 1.8V logic input. Is a resistive divider the way to go? Mark ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp Module Needed
Hi Bruce, Thanks for your reply. I'm aware that the tantalum capacitor is on of the weak points of the RF amplifer that excites the lamp. After testing the unit and using the monitoring software available I found that the problem relies on that specific part of the circuit. In fact the RF unit was burned like the tantalum capacitor you are refering. Last year I rebuild that circuit section interely with high quality components with good temperature reliability replacing the RF transistor, porcelain capacitors and metal film resistors. The lamp was heated up as well. The unit worked for about 6 months. Now I found again that the signal strenght received by the photocell has droped below the acceptable value so there is no more I could do except to send it back to SRS for lamp replacement... Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: brucekar...@aol.com To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 3:21 PM Subject: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp Module Needed Vasco, As Brooke said it is unlikely there are spare PRS10 lamp modules found outside the manufacturer. The probable reason is that when the PRS10 units are assembled certain adjustments to the firmware are necessary such as the starting level and final bias of the FET oscillator transistor. As far as I know, SRS has not revealed how to access to these factory settings. It might be possible to repair your lamp assembly. One point of failure is the Tantalum capacitor found in the lamp assembly. Another possibility is that the heater resistor may have changed value or opened. Although it looks daunting, it is possible to replace the FET power transistor; however, after replacing the transistor in one unit, I found the transistor's characteristics were a little different than the original and the operating parameters were not right. I considered adding some external resistors to shift the biasing, but finally decided to try another transistor with somewhat different characteristics. But in this second try I damaged the board. If the rubidium bulb assembly is suffering from old age, it might be possible to improve it with a heat gun as discussed on this listt several times in the past. The bulb is cemented in place, but it might be possible to remove and replace it. Bruce, KG6OJI ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp module needed
Someone could have a working lamp with a defective hardware but I know it is unlikely The PRS10 unit will be sent to ThinkSRS. Thanks Bob! - Original Message - From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp module needed Hi I doubt that a working lamp exists outside a working Rb. You may do better to simply get a new PRS10. Bob On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Vasco Soares vesoa...@deea.isel.ipl.pt wrote: Hi, I need a new rubidium lamp module for the PRS10 unit. Does anyone have a spare module? Regards, Vasco Soares ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp module needed
I've asked ThinkSRS a few months and they don't sell spare parts. I've no choice but send the PRS10 unit to them. Thanks Brooke! - Original Message - From: Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp module needed Hi Vasco: Have you asked http://www.thinksrs.com/ Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Vasco Soares wrote: Hi, I need a new rubidium lamp module for the PRS10 unit. Does anyone have a spare module? Regards, Vasco Soares ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] PRS10 Lamp module needed
Hi, I need a new rubidium lamp module for the PRS10 unit. Does anyone have a spare module? Regards, Vasco Soares ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Sine to square wave converter Phase Noise
Hi, What comparator did you use in your evaluation? An 74AC04, 74AC14 or other LT, AD, etc? Regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: br...@ko4bb.com To: time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:55 AM Subject: [time-nuts] Sine to square wave converter Phase Noise Recently I have been comparing the phase noise of the HOlzworth HX4210 and the LTC7957-4. I have found that the performance of these devices is comparable with a 10MHz sinewave input with a PN noise floor below -160dBc/Hz. For offsets below 100Hz the LTC6957-4 is quieter and for offsets below 50Hz or so is lower than that of my measurement setup. I merely mounted the LTC evaluation board in a diecast metal box to reduce the effect of air currents on the LTC7957-4 and used an ultra low noise 3.3V power supply (Abracon) to minimise the power supply contribution to the measured phase noise. Achieving a phase noise performance equal to that on the datasheet was relatively easy. In fact for low offsets the phase noise is lower than that shown on the datasheet. I've also measured the phase noise of a comparator based sine to CMOS converter and its PN floor is about 20dB higher than that of the LTC6957. On completion of measurements PN plots for the various sine to square conveters tested will be added to the web pages I maintain on Didiers site.. Bruce ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Sine or TTL signal transmission for low phase noise?
Hi! Taking a 10MHz signal from a rubidium clock to an external device it is better to use 0.5-1Vrms sine wave or TTL? A 75 ohm coaxial cable will be used with just 1 meter long. In any case the receiver will be made around a unbuffered gate with self biasing (it seems that the 74AC type has better phase noise performance, as stated on http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/LPRO-101.pdf. Circuit behaviour with other series like VHC, LV are unkown, at least for me!). Anyone have experience on EMI/RFI issues and phase noise performance under these circumstances? Regards, VS ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] 'CPLDs for clock dividers' Thread
Hi All, With respect to jitter does anyone compared the solutions using a PLL or DCM on FPGAs for clock dividing? For instance, from 10 MHz to 44.1 kHz which would be the best option? Does a CPLD supersedes those FPGA functionalities for that kind of operation? Best regards, Vasco Soares - Original Message - From: brent evers brent.ev...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 'CPLDs for clock dividers' Thread Precious little to add to this, just to confirm that back in another life at Watkins Johnson (early 90's), we used CPLD's for low phase noise dividers all the time. My work at the time was focused on everything but the divider. Brent On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote: Hi If you disable all the internal clocks (normally fairly easy) and your supply is clean and it’s a modern high speed part, you can get into the high 150’s to low 160’s on a 10 MHz output with a CPLD. If you have one of those wonderful old designs where the charge pump clocks (or what ever) stay on all the time, you will be in the 120’s to 130’s. Bob On Jan 5, 2014, at 9:11 PM, John C. Westmoreland, P.E. j...@westmorelandengineering.com wrote: Hello All, I was looking at the archives - what was the outcome of this: Thanks to everyone for their advice. I bought a CoolRunner II development board (only $39!) and will let you know how it goes. Matt On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Matt Ettus boyscout at gmail.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts wrote: * Does anyone have any experience using CPLDs for very low phase noise ** dividers? You can get an XC9536XL from Xilinx for around $1, and I ** thought it would make a good divide by 2 through 10 device. ** Matt* A lot of the discussion focused on the difficulties of downloading the tools for Altera or Xilinx - the Max II family from Altera was recommended - but there was no apparent outcome or resolution to this thread - seemingly. Does anyone have that CPLD recommendation? Thanks, John Westmoreland ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.