Re: [time-nuts] 10811

2013-05-02 Thread ka3zyx
I should have given this URL: 
http://home.comcast.net/~rdirosario/site/?/photos/ 
which gives you the full resolution if you click on the photos. 

Robert 

- Original Message -
From: ka3...@comcast.net 
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"  
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 11:15:56 PM 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10811 

I just posted some photos at: 
http://home.comcast.net/~rdirosario/site/?/page/HP_5061-6168_photos/ 

- Original Message - 
From: "John Miles"  
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"  
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:53:49 PM 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10811 

> Close, but it's for the 105, not the 5061, and the boards are physically very 
> different. 

The 5061A upgrade used those 105-series boards. With the 5061B, they changed 
the part number of A1A3 (the OCXO interface board) from 00105-6044 to 
05061-6198, but I don't see any major differences in the schematic, looking at 
the Artek .PDF manual for the 5061B. 

> The part number on the connector for the board is the same as the connector 
> for the 10811. Does anyone know where to get boards that fit the connector? 
> Mouser carries the connector, but I can't find any boards. 

You don't really need a board -- I didn't use one (see 
http://www.ke5fx.com/tbolt.htm ). It uses a pretty common edge connector that 
can be pulled off of any number of random surplus HP PCBs, if you don't want to 
order one. 

> how often do people need to retune the 10811? I have a pair of the 10811- 
> 60109's, another 10811, and a 10544 and all are within 1 Hz of 10 MHz. That's 
> close 
> enough 

Some anecdata: my GPS-disciplined 10811-60109 has been running for about 5 
years without any retuning. The DAC voltage is currently about 0.52V, and I'm 
sure I would have started it out near 0.0, so about 10% of its EFC control 
range has been needed after 5 years. (Of course it could have wandered around 
arbitrarily in the meantime, but I doubt it.) 

At -0.324 Hz/volt, this would be about 0.03 Hz per year of positive drift on 
average, or 3E-9 per year. That's in line with what I've seen other 
well-settled 10811s achieve. 

> Is there any advantage in using the 723 voltage regulator? The 10811 and 
> 10544 manuals both show the use of the 723 for the regulator for the 
> oscillator supply, 
> but on the HP schematic for the 6198 board they use a pair of three terminal 
> regulators. 

HP's use of an LM317T-style regulator to drive the 18V oven supply, a 78L12 to 
drive the oscillator, and a Zener+emitter follower to drive the 7474 divider 
was a bit funky. Regulator noise on the oven supply isn't critical, but for 
driving the oscillator circuit itself, the difference between a 7812 and an 
LM317T can be seen in some cases. Not sure offhand how sensitive the 10811 is 
to supply noise, but you can certainly see the difference in regulators with a 
Wenzel ULN. 

In any event an LM317T would be fine for driving the +12 rail. 

-- john, KE5FX 
Miles Design LLC 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 10811

2013-05-01 Thread ka3zyx
I just posted some photos at: 
http://home.comcast.net/~rdirosario/site/?/page/HP_5061-6168_photos/ 

- Original Message -
From: "John Miles"  
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"  
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:53:49 PM 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10811 

> Close, but it's for the 105, not the 5061, and the boards are physically very 
> different. 

The 5061A upgrade used those 105-series boards. With the 5061B, they changed 
the part number of A1A3 (the OCXO interface board) from 00105-6044 to 
05061-6198, but I don't see any major differences in the schematic, looking at 
the Artek .PDF manual for the 5061B. 

> The part number on the connector for the board is the same as the connector 
> for the 10811. Does anyone know where to get boards that fit the connector? 
> Mouser carries the connector, but I can't find any boards. 

You don't really need a board -- I didn't use one (see 
http://www.ke5fx.com/tbolt.htm ). It uses a pretty common edge connector that 
can be pulled off of any number of random surplus HP PCBs, if you don't want to 
order one. 

> how often do people need to retune the 10811? I have a pair of the 10811- 
> 60109's, another 10811, and a 10544 and all are within 1 Hz of 10 MHz. That's 
> close 
> enough 

Some anecdata: my GPS-disciplined 10811-60109 has been running for about 5 
years without any retuning. The DAC voltage is currently about 0.52V, and I'm 
sure I would have started it out near 0.0, so about 10% of its EFC control 
range has been needed after 5 years. (Of course it could have wandered around 
arbitrarily in the meantime, but I doubt it.) 

At -0.324 Hz/volt, this would be about 0.03 Hz per year of positive drift on 
average, or 3E-9 per year. That's in line with what I've seen other 
well-settled 10811s achieve. 

> Is there any advantage in using the 723 voltage regulator? The 10811 and 
> 10544 manuals both show the use of the 723 for the regulator for the 
> oscillator supply, 
> but on the HP schematic for the 6198 board they use a pair of three terminal 
> regulators. 

HP's use of an LM317T-style regulator to drive the 18V oven supply, a 78L12 to 
drive the oscillator, and a Zener+emitter follower to drive the 7474 divider 
was a bit funky. Regulator noise on the oven supply isn't critical, but for 
driving the oscillator circuit itself, the difference between a 7812 and an 
LM317T can be seen in some cases. Not sure offhand how sensitive the 10811 is 
to supply noise, but you can certainly see the difference in regulators with a 
Wenzel ULN. 

In any event an LM317T would be fine for driving the +12 rail. 

-- john, KE5FX 
Miles Design LLC 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] 10811

2013-04-30 Thread ka3zyx


I'm looking for documentation on two HP boards that are part of a module. 

The frame is labeled 05061-6168 and has an 10811-60109 oscillator, a board 


labeled 05061-6199 61003F and a second board labeled 05061-6198 61103F. 


Both boards are labeled “Series 2552”. The first board (6199) and the 
oscillator 


plug into the second board (6198). 




With the 6199 board this looks like a drop-in replacement for the older 
oscillator. 


(I have a 00105-6013 Crystal oven assembly.) 




The only 5061 manuals I find on the web use the old oscillator module. 




On ke5fx 's page (http://www.ke5fx.com/norton.htm) I found “HP 0105-6100 


assembly schematic” http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/norton/ocxo_assy.pdf. 


Close, but it's for the 105, not the 5061, and the boards are physically very 
different. 




I'm building a GPSDO and want a 10 MHz output. I would like to find 
documentation 


on the 6198 board and replace the 6199 board with my own. 




The part number on the connector for the board is the same as the connector for 


the 10811. Does anyone know where to get boards that fit the connector? Mouser 


carries the connector, but I can't find any boards. 




If I use the mounting frame I have easy access to the mechanical tuning 
control, but 


how often do people need to retune the 10811? I have a pair of the 
10811-60109's, 


another 10811, and a 10544 and all are within 1 Hz of 10 MHz. That's close 
enough 


for the EFC in a GPSDO. 




Is there any advantage in using the 723 voltage regulator? The 10811 and 10544 


manuals both show the use of the 723 for the regulator for the oscillator 
supply, but 


on the HP schematic for the 6198 board they use a pair of three terminal 
regulators. 




Thanks 

Robert, ka3zyx
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.