[time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn Down Time

2012-03-26 Thread GandalfG8
To anybody else attempting to use Loran-C from Anthorn in the UK for timing 
 or frequency calibration purposes, I have just found out the hard way  
that it's scheduled to be off air every day from today until 6th April  
inclusive between the hours of 0700 and 1900 UTC :-(
 
Other stations in the Lessay chain should still be available during this  
period.
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn

2010-07-12 Thread jimlux

EB4APL wrote:
A word of caution here:  Don't trust Google maps coordinates for any 
technical / serious work, they can have errors in the 100´s meter 
class.   And also don't use the copyright date of the maps and images as 
a time reference, they normally are older than that. If you live in an 
area under urban development you can check what I mean.
Take in account that this is a beautiful thing for locating a restaurant 
or a route, and can be classified as a geomarketing tool, not a 
measuring one.



For that matter, what ellipsoid is google maps using?  GPS is WGS84, but 
many (if not all) topographic maps in the US are still NAD27 (the 
corrections are in the bottom left corner). The difference in horizontal 
position around where I live is some 30-40 meters.


Google has to reconcile their imagery, their map data, and their 
topography somehow, and I imagine they take it all to some common 
ellipsoid, but it's possible they don't.  (That is, nobody is using 
Google earth to fly a plane across oceans)


Especially if you are using digital elevation models (DEMs) (e.g. to do 
propagation path analysis), you can be off by 50-100 meters comparing 
the topography in the DEM to the feature on the ground.  A "3 second" 
DEM has horizontal control comparable to a 1:250,000 map.


If you see that phrase at the bottom of a USGS map "Meets national map 
accuracy standards" it helps to know that the standard is basically 
"positions are accurate to the diameter of a pencil point or about 
1/50th of an inch: 0.5 mm)"  0.5mm on a 1:250,000 map is 125 meters.



Google is my friend, and I turned up the following with respect to 
Google Earth (which is NOT the same as Google Maps, apparently)


"We represent the earth as a sphere (special case of an ellipsoid). The
surface of our sphere corresponds to 0 meters sea level. As far as the
KML coordinate system, we consider 0 meters altitude to be sea level,
and we draw KML and terrain in a way that's consistent with that.
Specifically, the EGM96 geoid is our sea level, a potato-like shape
that's smoothly varying but not perfectly smooth, and represents mean
sea level around the globe. The geoid (and therefore sea level) is
offset from the ideal WGS84 reference ellipsoid by as much as 200
meters or so in some places. "

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn

2010-07-12 Thread EB4APL
A word of caution here:  Don't trust Google maps coordinates for any 
technical / serious work, they can have errors in the 100´s meter 
class.   And also don't use the copyright date of the maps and images as 
a time reference, they normally are older than that. If you live in an 
area under urban development you can check what I mean.
Take in account that this is a beautiful thing for locating a restaurant 
or a route, and can be classified as a geomarketing tool, not a 
measuring one.
You can verify this yourself easily comparing your GPS antenna location 
with the coordinates given by the program and also looking for roads, 
etc. mismatches in the image seams.


I had to explain this a lot of times to guys trying to do shortcuts for 
technical projects.


Regards,
Ignacio, EB4APL


Peter Vince wrote:

Hello Antonio,

 Looking at the aerial photographs on Google Maps, the transmitter
building can be seen at 54.91224°N, 3.27831°W - nearer Cardurnock than
Anthorn!  Which are the actual aerial masts though, I don't know.
Might I suggest you contact Peter Whibberley at the National Physical
Laboratory (peter.whibberley (at) npl . co . uk) - if he can't tell
you, he will certainly know who can!

 Regards,

  Peter Vince



On 12 July 2010 00:40,   wrote:
  

Greetings to the group.

I would like to have the exact (and trustworthy...) WGS84 coordinates
of the Anthorn Loran-C antenna. Searching the net I got at least three
different sets of LAT/LONG. It seems to me that exactitude is not a cult
anymore, except for us the nutties...

I would also appreciate to have the exact Coding Delay for that transmitter.
(Not the Emission Delay, which is known to be 27,300.00 uS).

Thanks in advance.

Antonio
CT1TE


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
__




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn

2010-07-12 Thread mike cook
note that at 54,9 degrees, one least significant decimal digit in the 
latitude/longditude is approx  11cm/6cm .  That might well explain why 
there are multiple references.


Le 12/07/2010 11:46, Peter Vince a écrit :

Hello Antonio,

  Looking at the aerial photographs on Google Maps, the transmitter
building can be seen at 54.91224°N, 3.27831°W - nearer Cardurnock than
Anthorn!  Which are the actual aerial masts though, I don't know.
Might I suggest you contact Peter Whibberley at the National Physical
Laboratory (peter.whibberley (at) npl . co . uk) - if he can't tell
you, he will certainly know who can!

  Regards,

   Peter Vince



On 12 July 2010 00:40,  wrote:
   

Greetings to the group.

I would like to have the exact (and trustworthy...) WGS84 coordinates
of the Anthorn Loran-C antenna. Searching the net I got at least three
different sets of LAT/LONG. It seems to me that exactitude is not a cult
anymore, except for us the nutties...

I would also appreciate to have the exact Coding Delay for that transmitter.
(Not the Emission Delay, which is known to be 27,300.00 uS).

Thanks in advance.

Antonio
CT1TE


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
__

 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



   





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn

2010-07-12 Thread Peter Vince
Hello Antonio,

 Looking at the aerial photographs on Google Maps, the transmitter
building can be seen at 54.91224°N, 3.27831°W - nearer Cardurnock than
Anthorn!  Which are the actual aerial masts though, I don't know.
Might I suggest you contact Peter Whibberley at the National Physical
Laboratory (peter.whibberley (at) npl . co . uk) - if he can't tell
you, he will certainly know who can!

 Regards,

  Peter Vince



On 12 July 2010 00:40,   wrote:
> Greetings to the group.
>
> I would like to have the exact (and trustworthy...) WGS84 coordinates
> of the Anthorn Loran-C antenna. Searching the net I got at least three
> different sets of LAT/LONG. It seems to me that exactitude is not a cult
> anymore, except for us the nutties...
>
> I would also appreciate to have the exact Coding Delay for that transmitter.
> (Not the Emission Delay, which is known to be 27,300.00 uS).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Antonio
> CT1TE
>
>
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com
>__
>

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Loran-C Anthorn

2010-07-11 Thread asmagal

Greetings to the group.

I would like to have the exact (and trustworthy...) WGS84 coordinates
of the Anthorn Loran-C antenna. Searching the net I got at least three
different sets of LAT/LONG. It seems to me that exactitude is not a  
cult anymore, except for us the nutties...


I would also appreciate to have the exact Coding Delay for that transmitter.
(Not the Emission Delay, which is known to be 27,300.00 uS).

Thanks in advance.

Antonio
CT1TE


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.