HI
It certainly sounds like the TDC 7200 is the way to go. Thanks for sharing !!
Bob
> On May 28, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Li Ang <379...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>I got 5 samples of TDC7200 from TI a few months ago. I have made a board
> to test it with TDC-GP22 from ACAM. Actually it's a new board of my frequency
> counter. The CPU system is changed from MCU to a OrangePi board. The digital
> part is still a Cyclone 4 FPGA.
>
>
> Verilog: http://www.qsl.net/bi7lnq/Projects/freqcnt4.2/100ns_noise_test.v
> Picuture: http://www.qsl.net/bi7lnq/Projects/freqcnt4.2/5.2.jpg
> Result: http://www.qsl.net/bi7lnq/Projects/freqcnt4.2/100ns_stdev.xls
>
>
> The DC-DC part works at 4MHz (MP2560), it generates a lot of noise. (stdev
> of 1000 measures is around 300ps). It's a mistake to put that on board.
> However, if the 5v is supplied by a HP E3630A, the performance is much more
> stable.
> The 100ns start-and-stop signal is generated by FPGA. I do not know if it's
> a stable way to do that. The 10MHz ref clock is from one FE180 OCXO and
> shaped by NC7SZU04.
> The STDEV of 1000 measurements by TDC_GP22 is 70ps. (45ps double resolution
> mode, STDEV is not given by the datasheet)
> The STDEV of 1000 measurements by TDC7200 is 20ps. (datasheet: 55ps
> resolution, 35ps STDEV RMS )
>
>
>So I think the TDC7200 is a better choice for my homebrew frequency
> counter. It's much more friendly to solder(TSSOP vs QFN). It's much more esay
> to config(2 Hours of coding vs 2 weeks of debugging). It's a little more
> expensive than TDC-GP22(9$ vs 4$).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> de BI7LNQ
> 73
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
