Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-18 Thread Greg Troxel

Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:

 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:51:45 -0500
 In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times
 very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this
 before - usually it's a few s slow.

Thanks for all the comments.  Following up from a real keyboard:

  The tracfrone was on the ATT network, per the code on the SIM.  So I
  think this was just ATT.

  The timing error was resolved sometime later on Saturday.

  I realize the phone display time and GSM time are not well connected.
  Emerald Time (iPhone program) does NTP and shows the difference
  between the time on the unix computer in the phone and NTP peers.
  Typically I see values from -0.5s to about 4.5s.  Right now it shows
  +4.348s (phone computer is 4.348s slow).  The phone display switched
  to 1849 at about 184907, which I attribute to 4s slow and a slow
  update rate of the display.

  Based on observing Emerald Time's offset over long periods, I believe
  that there is some loose synchronization of the phone cpu to the cell
  network, and that the phone free runs until it gets too far off and
  then it is stepped to be closer.

  On Saturday, Emerald Time was reporting +60.580.  The time on my phone
  was 1 minute slow and updated around minute boundaries, just one
  minute behind.

  A tracphone (LG featurephone) showed exactly the same one-minute slow
  behavior.  So I suspect that something was off in the GSM time
  reference.  I am not sure if more than one cell site was affected.


pgpVJVKfnar1U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-16 Thread Graham / KE9H

On 12/15/2012 9:38 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

GSM cell sites in the US have GPS because it is required to support E911
positioning.  I'm not sure if it is used for anything other than this, but
it doesn't have to be.

So it's cheaper to install and maintain GPS rather than make one measurement
and tell the setup where it is?




No.

In addition to knowing where the GSM cell site is, you time stamp the 
time of arrival of a
specific feature in the cellphone signalling system.  If the cellphone 
is heard by three
(or more) cell sites, then you can calculate the location of the 
cellphone within the

cell site using the time-of-arrival and speed-of-light calculations.

The CDMA systems inherently depend on knowing time to sub microseconds 
in order
to function.  You can extract similar information from the signalling 
systems in CDMA.


Newer cellphones have a GPS receiver front end inside the phone, which 
allows greater
accuracy than the time of arrival systems.  Many times, cellular signals 
bounce off
of things between the handset and the base station, introducing a path 
length change and
therefore a time-of-flight delay in the signal which causes errors in 
the time of arrival

calculations.

--- Graham / KE9H

==

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-16 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 12/16/2012 05:40 PM, Graham / KE9H wrote:

In addition to knowing where the GSM cell site is, you time stamp the
time of arrival of a
specific feature in the cellphone signalling system. If the cellphone is
heard by three
(or more) cell sites, then you can calculate the location of the
cellphone within the
cell site using the time-of-arrival and speed-of-light calculations.


Since GSM is a TDM system, the arrival time of the TDM slot is the 
typical feature to measure. The active base station already does this, 
and send trimming values to steer the hand-set to stay within it's 
time-slot. This way you have a range measure, but it isn't enough for 
triangulation, so you would need to have another station measuring it 
too, but GSM will not usually do that, so you need to have a secondary 
receiver, tuned to the neighbour frequency in that direction.



The CDMA systems inherently depend on knowing time to sub microseconds
in order
to function. You can extract similar information from the signalling
systems in CDMA.


You inherently have the same knowledge in GSM, it's just that you don't 
care about absolute time, but relative timing between the hand-set and 
the base station is being measured and steered.


GSM stations being phase-aligned have better hand-over properties, and 
thus releases the channel in the cell the phone is leaving quicker, and 
thus increases the capacity... and allows new customers in and thus more 
money. So, well-timed base-stations is good for GSM too.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Graham / KE9H

Greg:

You should switch to Verizon.
They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.

--- Graham / KE9H

==

On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times 
very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this 
before - usually it's a few s slow.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Scott McGrath
In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for its 
source

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com wrote:

 Greg:
 
 You should switch to Verizon.
 They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
 Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.
 
 --- Graham / KE9H
 
 ==
 
 On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
 In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times very 
 close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this before - 
 usually it's a few s slow.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Jim Lux

On 12/15/12 2:16 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:

In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for its 
source

On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com wrote:


You should switch to Verizon.
They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.


On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:

In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times very 
close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this before - usually 
it's a few s slow.




The time *displayed* on the phone might not reflect the time from the 
network.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Joseph Orsak
ATT uses UMTS in most areas which is a self-synchronizing modulation 
scheme. Supposedly one of the selling points is no dependence on GPS. All 
the extra sync channels and sync messaging is a capacity hog, not a very 
spectrally efficient standard in my opinion.


About 85 maximum simultaneous voice calls in a 5Mhz UL / 5 Mhz DL 
sector/carrier before it starts to fall apart. A big step backwards from 
good old CDMA2000 (also just my opinion).


But hey, you can surf the web while you talk on the same device.



-Joe W4WN


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error



On 12/15/12 2:16 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for 
its source


On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com 
wrote:



You should switch to Verizon.
They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.


On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times 
very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this 
before - usually it's a few s slow.





The time *displayed* on the phone might not reflect the time from the 
network.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

There are a *lot* of layers between the base station and the phone it's self 
when it comes to the time that's displayed. There also are a *lot* of 
opportunities  for error as each layer is linked together. Often when you see 
Verizon you are actually connected to Bob's Cell Phone Tower.  Bob may or 
(may not) be very careful about linking all the layers together. 

Best bet, use something like an NTP client, that goes *around* all the network 
stuff.

Bob

On Dec 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:

 On 12/15/12 2:16 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
 In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for its 
 source
 
 On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com wrote:
 
 You should switch to Verizon.
 They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
 Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.
 
 
 On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
 In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times 
 very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this 
 before - usually it's a few s slow.
 
 
 
 The time *displayed* on the phone might not reflect the time from the network.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread lists
I can assure you the GSM shacks have GPS timing in them. I can dig up the 
photos if you want.

-Original Message-
From: Joseph Orsak jor...@nc.rr.com
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:24:20 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

ATT uses UMTS in most areas which is a self-synchronizing modulation 
scheme. Supposedly one of the selling points is no dependence on GPS. All 
the extra sync channels and sync messaging is a capacity hog, not a very 
spectrally efficient standard in my opinion.

About 85 maximum simultaneous voice calls in a 5Mhz UL / 5 Mhz DL 
sector/carrier before it starts to fall apart. A big step backwards from 
good old CDMA2000 (also just my opinion).

But hey, you can surf the web while you talk on the same device.



-Joe W4WN


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error


 On 12/15/12 2:16 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
 In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for 
 its source

 On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com 
 wrote:

 You should switch to Verizon.
 They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
 Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.


 On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
 In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times 
 very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this 
 before - usually it's a few s slow.



 The time *displayed* on the phone might not reflect the time from the 
 network.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 12/16/2012 12:59 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:

I can assure you the GSM shacks have GPS timing in them. I can dig up the 
photos if you want.


Depens on how the network was built. GSM does not need anything but +/- 
50 ppb timing. The PDH backhaul will provide that usually. The time that 
the mobile get's comes from the controler, which could be slaved using 
NTP... or not. It may not even transfer time, since this is an option 
which many but not all operators have enabled.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Dennis Ferguson
GSM cell sites in the US have GPS because it is required to
support E911 positioning.  I'm not sure if it is used for anything
other than this, but it doesn't have to be.

In some other parts of the world it has been considered bad taste
to let the operation of telecommunications infrastructure become
dependent on a facility owned by the US military, so the standards
that are popular there often try to avoid that.

Dennis Ferguson

On 15 Dec, 2012, at 18:59 , li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
 I can assure you the GSM shacks have GPS timing in them. I can dig up the 
 photos if you want.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joseph Orsak jor...@nc.rr.com
 Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:24:20 
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error
 
 ATT uses UMTS in most areas which is a self-synchronizing modulation 
 scheme. Supposedly one of the selling points is no dependence on GPS. All 
 the extra sync channels and sync messaging is a capacity hog, not a very 
 spectrally efficient standard in my opinion.
 
 About 85 maximum simultaneous voice calls in a 5Mhz UL / 5 Mhz DL 
 sector/carrier before it starts to fall apart. A big step backwards from 
 good old CDMA2000 (also just my opinion).
 
 But hey, you can surf the web while you talk on the same device.
 
 
 
 -Joe W4WN
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error
 
 
 On 12/15/12 2:16 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
 In a prior life we had a CDMA timing receiver for NTP which used VZ for 
 its source
 
 On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Graham / KE9H time...@austin.rr.com 
 wrote:
 
 You should switch to Verizon.
 They are inherently accurate to milliseconds.
 Sub micro-seconds inside the base stations.
 
 
 On 12/15/2012 12:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
 In central mass, ATT and tracfone (? carrier) are showing phone times 
 very close to 1 min slow.  Virgin/sprint is ok.   I've never seen this 
 before - usually it's a few s slow.
 
 
 
 The time *displayed* on the phone might not reflect the time from the 
 network.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread David
I thought the networks did that deliberately to frustrate automated
time shifting.

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:04:05 -0500, Joe Leikhim jleik...@leikhim.com
wrote:

I have to wonder how seriously these network designers are with respect 
to timing.

For example we have Brighthouse cable. The time on the cable box clock 
is correct to WWV, however the program material is consistently 30 
seconds or so late meaning the end of the program is cut off. Since my 
wife tends to record everything on the air, it is not practical to 
extend the recorder by a minute or a conflict occurs with other recordings.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Hal Murray

 GSM cell sites in the US have GPS because it is required to support E911
 positioning.  I'm not sure if it is used for anything other than this, but
 it doesn't have to be. 

So it's cheaper to install and maintain GPS rather than make one measurement 
and tell the setup where it is?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Cell timing error

2012-12-15 Thread Dennis Ferguson

On 15 Dec, 2012, at 22:38 , Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:

 
 GSM cell sites in the US have GPS because it is required to support E911
 positioning.  I'm not sure if it is used for anything other than this, but
 it doesn't have to be. 
 
 So it's cheaper to install and maintain GPS rather than make one measurement 
 and tell the setup where it is?

E911 requires the carrier to be able to figure out where the handsets
are.  I think GPS is used as a common timing reference so they can
triangulate to locate the phone using time-of-arrival measurements
of the handset's transmissions made at several cell towers.

GSM/UMTS carriers do it this way, at least.  CDMA2000 carriers instead
rely on the handsets to make the time-of-arrival measurements, both
of signals from cell towers and of GPS signals the handset can hear.

Dennis Ferguson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.